November 08, 2006
Elections 2006
Well, that sure sucked, didn't it?
Freedom really took a hit here. If you don't believe that, you're seriously delusional. Let's look at my predictions for the "First 100 days:"
1. Democrats will raise taxes. That's simply what they do. Sure, they've been pleased with the massive increases in government spending over the last two years, but they literally cannot have enough money to spend. They will absolutely vote to raise taxes. This is their #1 priority. Bush will give token resistence, but don't expect him to actually veto, well, anything. He will whine and complain, but he'll sign the laws and raise taxes.
2. Democrats will attempt to destroy the American citizen. They will vote to allow all criminal aliens to become full citizens. At best, they may require these new citizens to pay a $1 processing fee. They will also likely be exempt from paying taxes and I won't be surprised if they're given the right to vote. Bush will not only support these actions, he will likely lead the charge. He's been trying to legalize criminals for years, and now he's got allies in the Congress.
3. Democrats will do all they can to surrender in Iraq. They will have trouble, because even though they don't understand that they're not in charge of the military, they will still try and get out. They will reduce funding for the military to the point where the military simply cannot do their job. Then Bush will be forced to withdraw the troops.
But wait, all hope is not lost! Seriously, please keep reading if you've read this far.
I would like to extend an invitation. To all those in Mecklenburg County who voted for Jim Puckett; to all those in Virginia that voted for Allen in Virginia; to all those who voted for conservative candidates and lost; to all those who are displeased with the direction this country is headed; to all those who want freedom; I personally invite you to do what the founders intended. I invite you to advance freedom. I invite you to withdraw you support (and money) from the moochers who want to crush you and only want you for your money. I invite you to vote with your feet. Please take a look at The Free State Project.
Are you frustrated at the loss of freedom and responsibility in America, while the growth of government and taxes continues unabated? Do you want to live in strong communities where your rights are respected, and people exercise responsibility for themselves and in their dealings with each other?
If you answered "yes" to those questions, then the Free State Project has a solution for you.
Seriously, folks, this is the only hope for America today. If you honestly love freedom and you are willing to DO SOMETHING about it, I strongly encourage you to go join the Free State Project. This isn't just blogging and complaining, this is action. The people who move to New Hampshire WILL be putting their words into action. This CAN work, but only if you who love freedom are actually willing to DO SOMETHING.
There were over 1,000,000 people who voted for Allen in Virginia. Only 20,000 are needed in New Hampshire to really make a serious change. Come on, Allen supporters, withdraw your support from your Democrat Senator and go to New Hampshire. Over 900,000 voted for Kean in NJ. Head to New Hampshire and let those in New Jersey who dislike freedom fend for themselves without your help.
Don't worry about all the excuses. Go ahead and complain that you can't find a job, that you don't like the weather, that your family won't like it -- I'm sorry, but all that means is that you're not really serious about liberty and freedom. If you honestly want freedom; if you really believe in "Live Free or Die," your only choice now is to join with the Free State Project. Any other option is just surrender.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:05 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 668 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Ogre, I empathize with your disgust and disappointment, but unfortunately that's not a viable option for me or my family. Sometimes, you just have to live with what's on the plate before you and do the best you can with what you have.
I don't mean (at ALL!) to be flippant, but just Who do you think is in control, anyway? Don't we have His promise that all things will work together for good, to those who love Him and are the called according to His purpose?
God has permitted this, but He's still guiding history, and we know who's going to win: Him. So, let us each do the task set before us, as we understand it, and let God take care of the rest. If the Free State Project is where you belong, that's great.
[claws]But please, if I choose another option, DON'T tell ME it's "just surrender," OK? [/claws]
-- Kat
www.CatHouseChat.com
Posted by: Kat at November 08, 2006 03:45 PM (3eSmr)
2
You always have options. Always.
And I'm not questioning Who is in charge -- but what if this is His way of telling people to gather together in one place, where there might be freedom?
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 03:49 PM (oifEm)
3
I agree that I have options, Ogre. However, dear brother, my choices of options are NOT the same as yours, and the choice I make may not be the choice you make.
Sure, moving up to NH is a lovely idea, and the FSP may be a worthy program... But it is NOT an option on MY plate. The option I choose to take is to stand my ground, and do my best where God has placed me.
That. Is NOT. "Surrender."
-- Kat
Posted by: Kat at November 08, 2006 04:14 PM (3eSmr)
4
Okay, okay, it's not surrender. Then again, Don Qixote never surrendered, did he?

And that's not an insult, I assure you, my efforts could put Don to shame!
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 04:17 PM (oifEm)
5
My illustrious governor has already said he'll be raising taxes. . . lovely. Like my bankbook won't take enough of a hit with Dimmocrats in power.
But, this election has taught me something - you don't need any real ideas to win - just say "I'm running for change" and voila you win.
Ahh well. Time to start formulating my evil plan to run for office . . .
Posted by: oddybobo at November 08, 2006 05:45 PM (mZfwW)
6
Well, I look at this in a different light. Those whom God calls to follow in our pioneer forefather's footsteps like Moses and Abraham, will be lead there. People like me, who knew nothing about this project or the promise of this place, and only new of the stirring of their heart and the longing of their spirit for a place where those of us who need to escape the Sodom's of this world can find a spiritual home and support (NH).
Then there are those who will be lead by God to surrender to their discontent and frustration of their present government and will be moved through God's will to action in their own communities, as his army of truth and power, to create positive change where we live.
In both situations it's the same responsibility - work and change - all lead by God for the furthering of his perfect Kingdom.
Posted by: michele at November 08, 2006 05:48 PM (etwyR)
7
I cannot believe that Black is still not out of it here in NC. Apparently there are enough Dhimmicrats in his district who do not care about what he has done as well as alledged to do.
And you are right, the Dems in Congress will try and surrender.
I do not think that Bush will allow the taxes to be raised. I fully expect him to whip out the veto pen on almost all dem legislation.
Posted by: William Teach at November 08, 2006 06:22 PM (IRsCk)
8
Hey Oddy, you've got the secret formula. Oddy for Governor: Because she'll change stuff.
Good points, Michele. Everyone has their part -- we just have to figure out which part is our own.
Black will still be in office until the feds finally catch up with him. The the Dem governor will name his "replacement." Look for Dan Blue to "lead" the House.
But I will be surprised if Bush uses the veto. I think the Dems will raise taxes in a bill that gives money to the military or something -- "forcing" him to sign it.
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 07:28 PM (oifEm)
9
And when will Pel-Ho-Si' "first 100 hours" shooting spree begin.
Posted by: Jenn at November 08, 2006 08:02 PM (QD9ey)
10
I'm sure she's already drafted the speeches...
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 08:03 PM (oifEm)
11
Sorry, I have to disagree on the taxes, Ogre. I just don't think he will allow Dems to play that game.
Posted by: William Teach at November 08, 2006 08:58 PM (cuTsc)
12
So when are you moving, Orge?
Posted by: Ginger Bush at November 08, 2006 11:04 PM (Bacxq)
13
I certainly hope you're right Teach -- but I wouldn't bet any money.
Ginger -- by December, 2008.
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 11:16 PM (GPb4I)
14
If "HE" is the force behind the recent upset of power then "HE" must be telling us that this is the beginning of the Apocolyspe.
Posted by: Quality Weenie at November 09, 2006 07:10 PM (U8gb+)
15
That is most certainly a possibility!
Posted by: Ogre at November 09, 2006 07:58 PM (oifEm)
16
Linking to me in there - ouch!!! I think you specifically meant here:
http://www.echozoe.com/?p=1815
I shall have to begin persuading the wife. Perhaps I can also talk her into letting me buy into a flying club so that we can fly home frequently (a flying club is a group of pilots that collectively own airplanes, perhaps 30 people own 4 planes for instance.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at November 10, 2006 01:49 AM (8POA1)
17
See? There's all kinds of ideas. And from what I've been reading and seeing, the people of NH are VERY welcoming, and the Free State Project people are even MORE welcoming! At least you won't have to worry about adjusting to the cold if you move!
Posted by: Ogre at November 10, 2006 02:00 AM (GPb4I)
18
I think that New Hampshire is the Wrong Place as Somalia is sending Islamists Somalis there to take over small towns. Its only a matter of time before the state constitution is Sharia Law.
Posted by: Skyler the Weird at November 12, 2006 07:05 PM (KkQmZ)
19
I think California or Oregon will fall to Sharia before NH.
Posted by: Ogre at November 12, 2006 07:06 PM (GPb4I)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 06, 2006
Why Vote?
Why should I bother to vote? After all, in New York, the dead
are voting in record numbers. Chuck Norris says
to vote for conservatives. Well there's none on the ballot anywhere near me (including the judges). I'll let you know if I spot one.
Some people that claim to like freedom are voting Democrat to teach those nasty big-government Republicans a lesson -- presumably by attempting to replace them with bigger government Democrats. And heck, according to the media, the Democrats have already won. Maybe the dead are winning with large amounts of "early voting."
Around the world, leftists are winning. Why should the US be any different? Why shouldn't we give up on freedom? Where on this entire planet, is freedom expanding? Where is freedom successful in the 21st century? It works everywhere it's tried, but no one is trying it any more.
The only possible tiny glimmer of hope for freedom left on the planet lies with The Free State Project -- and they can't seem to find 20,000 people on the entire damn planet that are interested in freedom. And oh yes, I've signed up. And I've joined as part of the first 1,000. So where's everyone else who wants freedom?
Posted by: Ogre at
04:36 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Why vote? Because my country needs me.
Posted by: oddybobo at November 06, 2006 04:41 PM (mZfwW)
2
But Oddy, you're not on my ballot and in North Carolina, it's against the law to write-in people you really want to vote for.
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 04:50 PM (oifEm)
3
What, no write in ballots? [shakes her head in disbelief]
So,as one of the first 1,000 do you get a T-shirt?
Posted by: michele at November 06, 2006 05:45 PM (BN/Fu)
4
If we get 1,000, we'll get much more than t-shirts! We'll get freedom.
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 08:03 PM (oifEm)
5
I hope the first 1000 works! I've signed up as a "friend" of the FSP a while back. Busy making noise in OC, but depending on the state of the nation, NH is looking better and better. Maybe sooner than later. My kids are busy working for a scholarship in Water polo, and i just don't see NH being an advantage for them at this time. :-)
When they're in college and I retire, I go up there and raise some hell with you.
Posted by: Mark in OC at November 07, 2006 05:49 PM (VyO0o)
6
I've heard from those already on the ground there that it's a good time -- I'm ready to cram some freedom down some people's throats, whether they want it or not.
Posted by: Ogre at November 07, 2006 06:24 PM (oifEm)
7
If my wife wasn't tying me to the People's Republic of Minnesota, I'd sign up. (She is not a liberal, she just doesn't want to live so far from her family)
Posted by: Echo Zoe at November 08, 2006 12:16 AM (8POA1)
8
Oh, just get her to move the whole family! (As long as they're not all liberals, too)
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 12:29 AM (GPb4I)
9
Nope, her parents are small business owners, and could definitely afford to pay all of the moving expenses.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at November 08, 2006 02:16 AM (8POA1)
10
Well, come on! Bring them along! I'm being serious here! Vote with your feet and invite everyone along to join in with freedom.
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2006 12:29 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cheney's Sense of Humor
If nothing else,
this shows that Republicans, and Cheney in particular, certainly have a sense of humor. Dick Cheney is going hunting on election day. After all the tasteless jokes over and over again about the last time he went hunting, in which an associate of his was accidentally shot in the face, the timing on this absolutely has to be intentional.
Either it's for the humor value, or to get the lunatics over at the Democratic Underground something shiny to look at and talk about.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:01 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hunting Matters!
Karl Rove is in control again....
Posted by: Michael at November 06, 2006 04:01 PM (JWeV4)
2
I wonder if Rove ever goes hunting.
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 04:12 PM (oifEm)
Posted by: michele at November 06, 2006 04:44 PM (cV7Xy)
4
I haven't been with Cheney, if that's what you're asking.
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 04:51 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 04, 2006
Conservative Redefined
It seems that, like the Democrat Party, the Republican are simply changing their definition of words to fit their own purposes. Many who supported the Democrat Party when they were classic liberals have found the party has left them. Many have not yet realized their party has drastically morphed. Republicans are picking up on that morphing as well to their own party.
Yesterday I got an ad supporting a Republican for Congress in my district. He will win with about 75% of the vote because the district was clearly and obviously drawn to elect a Republican. His ad says: "Re-Elect Patrick McHenry for Congress. Effective. Conservative."
So, let's see what the "new" definition of "Conservative" is:
"Congressman Patrick McHenry voted against CAFTA because it would cost thousands of Western North Carolina jobs"
So now, supporting higher prices and reducing freedom for companies is somehow conservative?
He's fighting to get more money out of the education bureaucracy....
So increasing government spending is now also, apparently, "conservative."
I SO wish there was somewhere for people to go who actually wanted to be free, because this place sure isn't it.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:13 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"I promise to do dis, dat, und dee odda theeng!"
The Three Stooges
Posted by: Weapon of Mass Disturbance at November 04, 2006 04:36 PM (x4Fjq)
2
They'd get elected if they put a D or R behind their name.
Posted by: Ogre at November 04, 2006 06:07 PM (196ug)
3
He's fighting to get more money out of the education bureaucracy....
Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but I thought getting money
out of bureaucracy was a good thing. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to explain where he wants that money to go, to understand why this is not conservative.
Posted by: McGehee at November 04, 2006 08:41 PM (lAOTn)
4
He wants MORE spending by the government. And, of course, for government to get money, they have to take it from me fight. Conservatives from previous decades would want government to take less and spend less.
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 12:25 AM (GPb4I)
5
Fair enough. Though the ad makes it sound like the money's already in the bureaucracy, that could be just like Clinton referring to tax hikes as increases in "contributions."
Posted by: McGehee at November 06, 2006 01:15 AM (lAOTn)
6
Indeed, same idea. This position by many Republicans is, "Well gee, we already took the damn money from you, let's spend it on GOOD things instead of the bad things Democrats will spend it on."
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 01:57 AM (GPb4I)
7
I've come to the conclusion that McHenry has no idea what he is doing -- he just wants to be in Congress.
Posted by: JAT at November 06, 2006 12:27 PM (dH2ZC)
8
That's true, and you'd be more convinced if you talked to him in person. I met him at a town meeting last year. He agreed with everyone in the room that immigration was a problem -- but he openly said, "Gee, I don't know what the solution is. No matter what we try, some people wouldn't like it."
In other words, he's not going to do anything that might make people not like him -- or not re-elect him.
Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2006 12:35 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 03, 2006
Sue Myrick gets it
I heard a radio ad on the way into work today. Sue Myrick (R-NC9) gets it. I can't find the text of the ad, but it general goes something like this:
Radical muslim jihadists want to kill us. And they are coming across our southern border. I want to stop them. I want to add guards to the southern border and I voted for a border fence.
She gets it, she really does.
Keep in mind when you vote next week, this IS the Republican Congress. Sure, Bush has some serious problems with the border and immigration, but he's not up for election, the Congress is. Vote Republican if you support Sue's position. Vote Democrat if you oppose it.
Posted by: Ogre at
03:08 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
1
A nation is like a family. Those who are most likely to harm you already live here.
Again, a politician is pandering to the public's fear of screaming idiots from overseas.
Posted by: Weapon of Mass Disturbance at November 03, 2006 05:47 PM (x4Fjq)
2
It's not really pandering when those fears are realistic.
Posted by: Ogre at November 03, 2006 07:38 PM (oifEm)
3
Violent crime committed against individual Americans by other Americans does not seriously threaten the interests of wealthy, powerful people in spite of the fact that our national murder rate is between five and six 9/11's every year.
Acts of terrorism do threaten wealthy powerful people and serve as a vehicle to unify voters and focus their attention on a perceived, common threat. Foreign terrorists are not a minor problem, but your children are far more likely to be killed by a family member, neighbor, or classmate.
Guess which threat receives the most attention today.
Posted by: Weapon of Mass Disturbance at November 03, 2006 10:16 PM (x4Fjq)
4
Guess no one who died in NYC or the Pentagon were "wealthy, powerful people."
Posted by: Ogre at November 03, 2006 10:54 PM (196ug)
5
I'm sorry, but fear of people who are honestly working their entire life to kill me is a very rational fear.
Posted by: Ogre at November 10, 2006 10:54 AM (GPb4I)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2006
Democrats

Folks, this IS your Democrat party, whether you want to admit it or not. Seriously. The official position of the National Democrat Party is that the military is stupid and not needed. No matter what your local candidate says, if you vote to put Democrats in charge, you ARE voting for this position.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
I wonder if the concept of treason even exists any more.
Hat Tip to Darleen.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:09 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: oddybobo at November 02, 2006 04:03 PM (mZfwW)
Posted by: Ogre at November 02, 2006 04:08 PM (oifEm)
3
In 1984, my drill sargeant said it best, "You joined the army 'cause you had nowhere else to go."
I don't believe that John Kerry hates war veterans. He was simply stating that military service is one of the few options open to those who lack special skills and/or advanced education. But this being an election year, he foolishly chose to phrase an element of common knowledge as a put down of the opposing party.
Posted by: Weapon of Mass Disturbance at November 03, 2006 05:41 PM (x4Fjq)
4
So maybe in your case, you had nowhere else to go. There are hundreds of thousands that had plenty of other places to go, but CHOSE to defend this country. Most of our all-volunteer military is that way.
I do believe that Kerry honestly hates the military, as does the entire Democrat Party leadership.
Posted by: Ogre at November 03, 2006 07:37 PM (oifEm)
5
I tend to believe that those who appear to hate the military are only being opportunistic. The war's going badly, so pander to the anti-war sentiment. If Iraq were relatively peaceful and democracy was flourishing there, Kerry et al would be equally quick to praise our glorious efforts to civilize the world through superior firepower.
Politicians are ready to believe whatever the voters want to hear.
Posted by: Weapon of Mass Disturbance at November 04, 2006 12:56 AM (x4Fjq)
6
That might be believable if they had changed their view. Kerry has hated the military his entire life. Heck, even when Clinton won the presidency, he cringed when he saw military jets fly over because he despised them so much. Instead, those who hate the military (Democrats) instead USE the military they hate so much in an opportunistic way.
Posted by: Ogre at November 04, 2006 04:15 PM (196ug)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 31, 2006
Richard Pombo: For Property Rights
The Radical left is pouring millions into his race in order to defeat him and replace him with a liberal politician who, according to his own statements, wants to raise taxes, repeal the federal death penalty, and give amnesty to illegal aliens. His call for an immediate withdrawl of our troops is a dangerous idea that could leave us vulnerable to domestic terrorist attacks here on American soil.
His name is Richard Pombo. He has probably never asked you for anything before, and he isnÂ’t now. We are.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
01:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 704 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I hate to break it to you, but Pombo does not need any help. He has raised over $3 million from oil/gas industries and other corporations. The RNCC dumped $1 million more on this race. You are just being fooled by Pombo's campaign staff. He has all the money he needs. Don't be fooled into giving away your hard-earned money.
Posted by: Wayne Johnson at October 31, 2006 04:20 PM (oMrHD)
2
Well if his opponent raises $10 million, what good is $3 million?
Posted by: Ogre at October 31, 2006 04:25 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 30, 2006
Democrats Select (not elect)
Just to help illustrate how utterly broken the political system is in North Carolina, just look at the latest "election." Dan Blue
has just been appointed to a 2-year, 2-month term in the General Assembly, where it is very likely he will seek, and may win, the speaker's seat. And he did it without one single vote from anyone in his district. Instead, he was appointed by "Democrat leaders."
So, just to make this crystal clear: the next speaker of the North Carolina House may have gotten to the seat of speaker without one single vote from a taxpayer in his district.
Explain to me again why I'm supposed to care about elections. Tell me again how my vote is supposed to matter. Tell me again how we're a representative republic where the people who pay the taxes get to elect people to represent them. Oh how I yearn for freedom!
Posted by: Ogre at
01:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
October 28, 2006
SCARY!
If you want your yearly Halloween scare,
click here.
(H/T to VW Bug).
Posted by: Ogre at
04:08 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Excellent!!!!
....and true, Hillary as President would be as bad a nightmare as having Freddy K. come to call.
Posted by: Seth at October 29, 2006 12:51 AM (r1vdM)
2
I just cannot even imagine the damage that would be done with Hillary and a Democrat Congress.
Posted by: Ogre at October 29, 2006 01:29 PM (196ug)
3
yea, I think you win for scariest greating card.
Posted by: Contagion at October 29, 2006 02:28 PM (AX/KF)
4
Just keep it away from the children.
Posted by: Ogre at October 29, 2006 08:29 PM (196ug)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 27, 2006
Stupid Poll Results
"
Democrats winning!" Or so say the "poll results." They claim that
Today Democrats have an 11-percentage point advantage in the Congressional election (49-38 percent), up from a 9-point edge over Republicans two weeks ago.
Almost all Democrats would vote for their partyÂ’s candidate (92 percent), and most Republicans would vote Republican (85 percent). Independents are more likely to back the Democrat in their district by 14 points (43 percent to 29 percent).
However, in this type of election, that number is absolutely meaningless. Let me explain why:
In my Congressional District, the Republican will win. The Republican will get about 75-80% of the vote, because this is a vast Republican district. However, if 100% of the Democrats vote Democrat, the Republican might only get 74% of the vote. If only 50% of the Republicans vote, he might get 72% of the vote. And the independents? The vast majority of them (at least in NC) are Democrats who don't want to admit they're Democrats.
The same can be said for the vast wastelands that are Democrat districts (Mel Watt, D-NC). 100% of the Republicans could vote Republican in that district, but when they're outnumbered 2:1, it really doesn't matter.
Due to MASSIVE gerrymandering around the country, there are literally only a few of the 435 seats that might change hands. The only poll that's worth anything is a poll that polls ONLY in those districts.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 2 kb.
October 26, 2006
Vote Democrat!
Posted by: Ogre at
07:07 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LMAO, But I think it's spelled "edumacashun"
Oh well it's like this:
Democrats win the majority.
Republicans might take notice and when the economy goes to hell, there wont be a Democrat within 20 miles of Washington D.C. after the next election.
Posted by: Robert at October 27, 2006 12:15 AM (L1ubU)
2
Yeah, but that would all be Bush's fault, not the policies of the Dems, ya know
Posted by: William Teach at October 27, 2006 12:43 AM (doAuV)
3
Indeed, Teach -- if the Dems get in power, even MORE things will be Bush's fault...somehow...
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2006 01:30 AM (196ug)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Support Jim Talent
This week Wictory Wednesday presents
Jim Talent for re-election to the United States Senate.
Control of the Senate will come down to three races, Missouri, Tennessee, and Virginia. Jim Talent is fighting the hard fight in Missouri and he's a solid conservative. It's one thing to lose a seat because the sitting Republican has no conservative credentials, defending a solid conservative however is a must.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
05:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 311 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Thanks for profiling this candidate and getting the word out by rallying across state lines.
If it were not for my job I'd profile him too.
Posted by: michele at October 27, 2006 05:53 PM (FJ2Bh)
2
I don't have a lot of hope for this country with the current leadership, but I can certainly try and slow the destruction.
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2006 06:53 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Democrat Candidate Lies
Rep. William Delahunt (D-MA). Do you know him? Do you know of him? According to
Kit Jarrell, he's
a liar. But I did already say he's an elected official, so you really already knew that, didn't you?
Oh, and he's using the fraudulent information to appear on the ballot as a veteran. Sure, Democrats respect our military veterans...as long as it will get them money and/or power.
A politician lies and says anything to get elected or to get money to spend. A stateman says the truth, no matter who will be "offended" or what the result will be. We need statesmen, NOT politicians.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:02 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Have heard anything about the Patty Wetterling Congressional race in Minnesota's 6th District? She has had one of the dirtiest races I've ever seen, including having one of her paid compaign staff volunteer for her opponant's campaign to gain inside knowledge.
Her son was abducted back in the late 80's, and would be about my age if he is still alive, so she has been well known in Minnesota for almost 20 years. She's done good for child advocacy, but is one of the dirtiest politician wanna-be's.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 28, 2006 01:04 AM (8POA1)
2
Wetterling? Not a word. If it's dirty tricks and they're being done by a Democrat, I don't expect to hear about it in any media.
Posted by: Ogre at October 28, 2006 12:18 PM (196ug)
3
Mr. Ogre - this is my congressman. I suppose after Gerry Studds, the gay congressman who raped the page, anybody looked prety good. He's held the seat since 1996 when Studds resigned.
My two favorite moments from his debate last Thursday:
He has two opponents, a Republican named Jeff Beatty and a Green named Peter White who chided Bill Delahunt about missing intelligence briefings. He called him 'misinformed'. Peter then leaned into the mike and said, 'It's on the front page of the Boston Globe!' Delahunt lost it a little, did a Bill Clinton, wagged his finger at the audience and snarled 'Don't believe everything you read in the BOSTON GLOBE!'. I began to clap, and half the audience joined in, until thye realized what they were applauding...
My SECOND favorite moment - when a really rattled Bill Delahunt was doing his grand wrap-up, he intoned, "I'd like to share a quote from that distinguished author Alexis deToqueville, from 1980..." The audience murmur alerted him to his error, and he said, "I meant 1880."
He then read a quote from 'Amercia and the Amercans, published in 1835.
Another pretender, looking up a quote without EVER cracking the cover on a book!
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 30, 2006 05:52 AM (Xjen8)
4
And I bet he still wins in a landslide, right?
Thanks for the updates!
Posted by: Ogre at October 30, 2006 09:51 AM (196ug)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2006
Vote Democrat!
Posted by: Ogre at
05:01 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For a minute there, you had me worried my friend...until I scrolled down! ROFL!
The tide, she is a turnin'! My very RED state is 15-20% above usual early voting! I'll be voting tomorrow.
Posted by: DagneyT at October 25, 2006 10:03 PM (LbULG)
2
this is a great sign...
keep it up
Posted by: Michael at October 26, 2006 05:44 AM (uo+Pt)
3
I'm trying to think of really good slogans, so I'll try and keep this going until the election...
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2006 10:56 AM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
In NC, Unions support Socialism
In North Carolina, the Socialist Unions who absolutely despise freedom are throwing around a lot of money
to elect Democrats, at least according to the news report. However, that's not quite accurate. You see, Democrats have already gerrymandered the state to the point where it is absolutely impossible (barring a major event, like a civil war) for the Republicans to win. Everyone knows that, even the unions. So why would they be spending lots of money?
Because they're trying to buy votes. They know the Democrats will win in the state, so they are currently making a push to buy things like higher minimum wages and easier access to stupid workers.
If we had freedom, these unions wouldn't be able to lobby and give tons of cash to the state. Know where that money comes from? The state. The majority of union members in North Carolina WORK FOR THE STATE. So they're taking their money and using it to lobby the state for more government and more money. In a free republic, the government would be the absolute SMALLEST employer in the state, not the largest. Instead, we have a self-propagating system where they work for the state and take their money to bribe politicians to give them more money so they can give more money to the politicians.
Oh, how I yearn for freedom.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:01 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If you ever have the oppty to read the history of unions you will see that many were based on Communist Worker Models, where the state or gov't is the great protector, so of course they would do anything to perpetuate their blotted existence. The socialist version we have in the US is just that a slightly more palatable one, but the Communist Party a few years back made it their mission to infiltrate members as "union organizers" so they can spew their propaganda and hold corporations hostage with their demands.
For an example of this we need only look at the city of Detroit. They have had the largest number of home foreclosures every quarter for the past 2 years. People have been unemployed for longer than that, unemployment benefits continue to be extended for their citizens, yet no one AND I MEAN NO ONE, is willling to honestly look at the root causes or bite the bullet.
Nope they rather wait for the city to go to hell and then get Federal pork and subsidies from our respective pockets. Don't get me started!
Tarnation! & I was in such a good mood too!
Posted by: michele at October 25, 2006 09:22 PM (DPFIK)
2
I apologize, Ogre. I really do...for my brother that is! He's a government union leader in AFSME in Iowa...if I remember the acronym correctly.
Donks knew years back that they had to keep control of the government, which is why they instituted government unions. It's most of the reason we have so many "leaks" from State, Defense, Justice, et al! We will be years undoing their damage...if we can hold on to the House and Senate, which I believe we will do!
Needless to say, my brother and I have some interesting conversations...when we talk, which is not often.
Posted by: DagneyT at October 25, 2006 10:21 PM (LbULG)
3
Dagney, you should ask him if he's aware that his dues are being used for the legal fees of an elected official that's already been found guilty of violating the law and is still under various different federal investigations for further violations of the law...of course, since he's union, I'm sure that doesn't matter...
Sorry, Michele. I'm just amazed that so many people can support unions because they don't know their purpose. The primary purpose of a union is to stifle competition -- which causes prices to rise for everyone! And Detriot is still there? Geez, I thought they'd have closed down by now. Oh, right, the federal government will prop them up forever.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2006 10:58 AM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2006
Vote Democrat!
Where's
your sign?

H/T to
Pirate's Cove.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:02 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: William Teach at October 24, 2006 08:11 PM (IRsCk)
2
BTW, Akismet hates me again, too. Frags my own comments on my site. LOL.
Back to spam karma 2.
Posted by: William Teach at October 24, 2006 11:59 PM (doAuV)
3
I might have to make these every day until the election...
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2006 01:55 AM (196ug)
4
Go for it. I have.
Have a couple good ones, especially one about Harold Ford. Just waiting for Youtube to accept the video that goes with it.
Posted by: William Teach at October 25, 2006 04:06 PM (doAuV)
5
I don't have enough time to make the videos, I'll have to stick with pictures. I've actually considered having 500 or so road signs like these printed up so I can place them out with other political signs...
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2006 05:25 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Republican Judicial Candidates
In case you're in North Carolina and needed to know which judges are Republicans (and not bleeding heart liberals), here's the list for Mecklenburg County:
You need to have these names before going into the voting booth, as they will not have "Republican" by their names (because the Democrats realized that people were voting for Republican judges too much, so they took the party affiliation off the ballot).
The Republican Judicial candidates are:
* Rusty Duke
* Ann Marie Calabria
* Eric Levinson
* Mark Martin
* Kris Bailey
* Donna Stroud
* Richard Boner
* Lisa Bell
* Martha Curran (Clerk of Mecklenburg Superior Court)
Posted by: Ogre at
01:02 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is the most uninforming websites I've been to other than google... I think that you should really consider giving more USEFUL information
Posted by: Balla at October 31, 2006 12:41 AM (TopnD)
2
Why thank you very much!
And thanks for stopping along and taking time to leave a comment.
Posted by: Ogre at October 31, 2006 02:56 AM (196ug)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Greensboro News: Liberal is Conservative
The Greensboro Paper
weighs in on the Chief Justice election. As you might expect from the vast majority of North Carolina print newspapers, they endorse the Democrat. And in doing so, they expose their strong bias. The editorial actually says
This is a moderate-conservative court, and Parker fits comfortably into its centrist core
After saying a few paragraphs earlier that governor Easley appointed this person. Now I know that Easley actually claims to be conservative, but that's only because if he admitted his actual positions on the issues, he wouldn't win again. Then again, that's the strategy of the Democrat Party in North Carolina. If they actually admit what they stand for (higher and higher taxes, less education, medicine free to everyone except those who work, etc.), they would lose every election held. So they have to lie.
This editorial is more of the same. If you want someone who will actually enforce the laws that are on the books (even though they're written by socialists), then you should vote for Judge Rusty Duke for Chief Justice.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
October 23, 2006
Vote Judge Rusty Duke
Why Judge Duke?
Judge Rusty Duke is a conservative who as Chief Justice of our Supreme Court will uphold the Constitution of our state and protect the safety and property rights of our families.
Judge Rusty Duke has served as a trial judge for seventeen years, working with Clerks of Court, Sheriffs, and other law enforcement officers, lawyers and prosecutors.
Judge Rusty Duke opposes judicial activism that seeks to change social policy by judicial interpretation.
Judge Rusty Duke will work to keep the judiciary independent of the legislative and executive branches of government, as contemplated by the North Carolina State Constitution, and to make the courts more efficient.
Married for 33 years with three children, Judge Rusty Duke knows firsthand the stresses modern families face - and believes the traditional family is the foundation of our culture.
Learn more at www.rustyduke.com
This posting is neither paid for, supported by, nor coordinated with the Rusty Duke Campaign. It's just a semi-free citizen trying to exercise what's left of freedom of speech in North Carolina.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
September 27, 2006
Max Burns for Congress
This week Wictory Wednesday presents
Max Burns for the US Congress for the 12th District of Georgia. He is running a tight race against Democratic incumbent John Barrow.
The Israeli war in Lebanon has shown what will happen if we pull out of IraqÂ… the terrorists will claim victory and emerge even stronger and more emboldened. Max Burns understands this and supports the troops to complete their mission. We should live in a society that respects and supports those who risk their lives for our benefit. Sadly, we don't live in that society.
Max Burns understands that immigration doesn't require reform; it requires actually enforcing the laws on the books. Not enforcing the law has led to lawlessness and before any question of guest workers can be introduced, law and order needs to return to that segment of society.
The infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" has shown us that even a GOP lead Congress can still waste money. That is why earmark reform and a line item veto is all the more necessary. When pork can be put into budgets without debate (earmarks), the line item veto allows voters to put the heat on the President to bring sense back to Congressional spending. The GOP has gotten half of the equation right in lowering taxesÂ… now they need to cut spending. Max Burns supports this in the form of a balanced budget.
Families waste days and weeks each year trying to figure out their "fair share" of taxes. Not even the IRS can figure out the tax codeÂ… a book that is over 12 times larger than the Bible! Max Burns supports cleaning up the tax code so that families can clearly understand what the oweÂ… and the IRS can even figure it out too.
Please consider donating or volunteering to the Max Burns campaign. Help turn this blue seat red!
This has been a production of the Wictory Wednesday blogburst. If you would like to join Wictory Wednesday, please see this post or contact John Bambenek at jcb (dot) blog [at] gmail {dot} com. The following sites are members of the Wictory Wednesday team:
Posted by: Ogre at
04:01 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 361 words, total size 3 kb.
85kb generated in CPU 0.0928, elapsed 0.1558 seconds.
100 queries taking 0.1351 seconds, 282 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.