March 31, 2006
NC Conservative Agenda: Point 4
Continuing the discussion regarding the
7-point NC Conservative Agenda. Today is Point 4:
Help Communities Build Schools
Once again, feel free to weigh in either for or against this idea for North Carolina (even if you're not from North Carolina).
The lottery is a fact. It was named “The Education Lottery” and sold that it would be new money to help improve education. Now Governor Easley has admitted that the largest portion of lottery proceeds for lower class sizes and “More at Four” will be used to replace the money budgeted for these categories.
Both lower class sizes and More at Four will require additional classrooms, but the lottery proceeds barely address the problem of providing new classrooms. Conservatives should amend the lottery law establishing the distribution of lottery funds and designate more money for school construction. More at Four and lower classroom sizes will not be affected because they are already funded in the budget while school construction is not.
Local school districts that are experiencing phenomenal growth should receive preference in the distribution of funds, instead of the present formula that gives extra lottery dollars to counties with declining school populations.
In case you've never read this site before, I'll let you know my position on so-called "public" schools: they stink. It's a government-run monopoly that is interested in promoting itself and expanding, with zero emphasis on education.
Now I do realize that these agenda items are items that people have a hope of getting through the General Assembly THIS YEAR, so they can't put up there "Removal of the public school system" -- even if they should. This agenda items suggests that conservatives modify the lottery law to distribute funds differently. I disagree.
If you want to modify the lottery law, just remove the damn thing. It's state-sponsored, monopolistic gambling. If you want gambling in North Carolina, just legalize gambling and be done with it. You would get much better establishments than just the "lottery" if you did -- and there'd be competition and much less blatant lying if you did that.
This item also doesn't mention much about these "smaller class sizes" and "more at four" programs. Those are governor Easley's pet projects that he loves -- because they give him more power, more control, and more money -- not because they actually DO anything, because they DON'T.
After years of reducing class sizes and years of Easley's trademark "more at four" programs, there is absolutely ZERO correlation between participating in those programs and educational process. In other words, reducing the class size from 30 to 18 has NO effect on education -- other than making it cost more because more teachers are required.
There's supposedly a teacher shortage in North Carolina -- yet no one seems to make the connection that it's because of smaller class sizes -- which, once again, has NO EFFECT on the actual education received. NONE. Same with the "more at four" programs -- they're supposed to give "more opportunity" to "disadvantaged" youths. While there may be evidence of very short-term benefits, over the long run (into middle- and high-school) there's NO effect when comparing those who participated and those who didn't.
Of course, this fits into Easley and the Democrat's plans -- they WANT education to cost more. They WANT more money and more power for education -- and they don't care in the least that their ideas and programs don't actually educate. In their mind, the education system exists so they can spend money and spread power around, and for no other reason.
So no, I don't support "rewriting" the lottery to build more schools. If we want to change school funding at the state level, how about completely eliminating any funding for "English as a Second Language?" Seriously! There's BILLIONS being spent on that, and we shouldn't be spending a dime. If you can't figure what amounts are being used there, it's even easier -- if a school district even HAS an "English as a Second Language" program, that district gets no state money. Can anyone give me a reason why not?
Will this pass? It's hard to say. The lottery is such a hot topic up there, I'm thinking the Democrats will be afraid to touch it at ALL.
Previously:
Introduction
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
Posted by: Ogre at
03:07 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 730 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I am glad that some "adults" realize that class size and learning don't connect. I wish that these people would at least ask the student's what should be done. NOT the teachers. All the teachers want is more money so they can afford wants not needs.
Also note that not all teachers are like that just a majority/young.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 31, 2006 04:22 PM (5+Jvh)
2
It sounds good. It's hard to deny it. When you say, "Gee, won't people learn more if they're in a class of 5 as opposed to an auditorium?" It's hard to say no. But reducing from 30 to 28, or even 30 to 18 really has ZERO measurable effect! None!
Posted by: Ogre at March 31, 2006 04:25 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC CC Officials Clueless
I sure hope that the North Carolina Community College system doesn't teach economics. They just
demanded asked for more money because
Growth has created challenges. Those challenges can only be conquered with an infusion of financial support.
And yes, this guy IS "vice president for business and finance for the community college system."
So the complaint is that there has been an increase of 50,000 students in the system (since 1999), and they don't have enough money to teach them all. Anyone with a 6th-grade education that wasn't supplied by the government-run monopolistic school system can see the simple answer: charge more money.
But no, not anyone associated with government. Instead of actually asking the people who are getting something from the state, they want everyone ELSE to pay -- through more taxes. And they don't want a little, no, they want $141 million. Of that, only $31 million is to pay for students.
According to the NC state library, there are over 750,000 students enrolled. The average number of courses taken is 2, with the an average credit enrollment of 6. So, if the students paid a whopping extra $7 per credit hour, they'd pay for their own education. What a concept.
But that's not all they want. They want $33.5 million to give "faculty and staff" a seven percent raise. When is the last time YOU got a 7% raise? And being state employees, don't think for a minute that they're not already getting an annual cost-of-living raise -- that's built in for all state employees.
Once again, government fails to make any sense in a free and capitalist society. I think community colleges are a good system -- but the state is utterly incompetent in running that system.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
March 28, 2006
More GOOD NC Homeschooling News
The education system in North Carolina is really, really broken. Those who work inside it have zero interest in fixing it -- only in obtaining more power, money, and control. Keep that in mind when dealing with the government-run monopoly education system -- they are NOT interested in education, just money and power.
That's why I love reading about homeschooling, especially in North Carolina. I've mentioned before how much homeschooling is growing in North Carolina, mainly because of the poor "school environment" in North Carolina.
This news is regarding sports -- North Carolina Homeschooling just held the largest state championship for homeschoolers in the country for basketball -- there's over 42 teams in 11 cities. So much for the homeschoolers and their "lack of social interaction," eh?
There's other good news in the report, too, including music, debate, and other arts. Go read the good news!
Posted by: Ogre at
05:04 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 156 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for posting this! We're considering moving to North Carolina in the near future, and since we homeschool, I was wondering what the homeschooling climate is like there.
Posted by: writewingnut at March 28, 2006 07:52 PM (/xuNG)
2
It's not bad. Socially, its damn HUGE. In some counties, like Mecklenburg, the Homeschooling organizations are bigger than many other entire school DISTRICTS.
Legally, it's shaky. They require you to maintain attendance records and can inspect them at any time. They require your children take yearly standardized tests. Strangely enough, they don't require you to pass them, just take them, but still.
There's plenty of states worse, but there's many that are better, too.
Posted by: Ogre at March 28, 2006 08:01 PM (/k+l4)
3
I live in Texas which now officially has the worst schools in the nation. And homeschooling is really on the rise here. Had my son not been accepted into his schools gifted and talented program I'd have pulled him out of there and sent him to a private school. Since I'm a single (male) parent homeschooling isn't really an option unless I strike it rich.
Posted by: Dyre42 at March 29, 2006 04:47 AM (3cuHr)
4
Or -- some families have gotten together to do homeschooling together! Here in NC, that's only legal if you are secretive about it, but people can still do it sometimes.
Yes, the laws here actually state that you can only homeschool your OWN children, and not others. That's the government education establishment crushing any competition with the force of law.
Posted by: Ogre at March 29, 2006 12:35 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 16, 2006
Good School News!
...So you know it's got nothing to do with the hopeless cesspool that is government-run "public" education system.
Homeschooling is on the rise in North Carolina. It's up 36% in the last 5 years and continues to grow each year at a rate of about 8 to 10%. That's awesome. This shows that more and more people are acknowledging that the government is incompetent at teaching, well, anything.
And no, for those who know nothing about homeschooling other than what the liberal news media will tell you, it's not just religious nuts. The #1 reason that people are giving for homeschooling in North Carolina is "concern about the school environment."
Gee, you mean parents disagree with Mecklenburg County's School Board king Joe White, who says that children should experience the "diversity" of sitting next to convicted sex offenders in public school? Or maybe it's the arbitrary division of people by age, rather than by ability.
Homeschoolers ARE a success, by all measures. They are more educated, they are more well-rounded. They score higher on standardized academic tests and they are more socially adjusted (see here, and here) than those who have been sheltered in the walls of a school.
I used to say that homeschooling isn't for everyone -- I don't think that's quite right. You should get your children out of, and away from, the filth and waste that is the government school. If you can homeschool, that IS the best option -- I have yet to meet ANYONE who has tried homeschooling that did not like it.
Oh, and in North Carolina? You won't be alone -- at least 63,000 children are being homeschooled. If that were one school district, it would be the 4th largest in the state -- and that really is good news.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:05 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 304 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Home schooling is good, but the real difference between home schooling and government schooling to me is still the parents. I think this countries biggest problem is that parents don;t care about their children's education or are to busy working two or three jobs. Home schooled kids should do better since their parents support them.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 16, 2006 04:24 PM (5+Jvh)
2
And know why both parents work? To pay taxes. Seriously. I've looked at the numbers, and all married couples should, too. If add up all the taxes you pay in a year, including just property taxes and income taxes (federal and state), you will often find that number meets or exceeds the take-home pay of the lower salary -- and that's a real shame.
Posted by: Ogre at March 16, 2006 05:31 PM (/k+l4)
3
Awesome! I'm a homeschooling mom and we are moving (home) to the Raleigh area this summer when my husband retires from the Army - add me and my four kiddos to the statistic!
Posted by: Cate at March 18, 2006 12:47 AM (q/X8e)
4
Great to hear, Cate!
North Carolina is "fair" in it's homeschooling rules. They require you to register with the state, keep attendence records, and take end of grade test -- strangely enough it doesn't require anyone to PASS the tests, just take them...
Posted by: Ogre at March 18, 2006 09:24 PM (CyQ4M)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2006
Academic Freedom -- for Leftists only
Michelle Malkin points out
Newsbuster's report on
scumbag honored, esteemed, exalted, and celebrated member of the education establishment, Jay Bennish. In case you missed the case, he is a government employee who advocates treason against the United States.
He has been reinstated without any visible punishment and is permitted to continue teaching anything he wants in his "World Geography" class, including continuing to advocate that enemies of the United States should bomb this country. If there was any penalty, it may have been a minor "letter of reprimand" -- or it could have been a letter of commendation -- the school district will not say.
Either way, the taxpayers who pay his salary have been told that he can and will continue to preach for the destruction of the United States and the taxpayer will continue to pay for it, allegedly in the name of "academic freedom."
Of course, academic freedom ONLY applies to the left and Democrats. You see, a teacher in Miamidared to mention words from the Bible in school. "Students are upset." "It is distracting." The principle has "discussed his comments" with him and has not yet determined if he has violated any school policies.
So, if you mention the Bible in direct response to other students mocking it, that's insensitive, wrong, and may violate district policies. But if you openly advocate treason against the United States, you get rewarded and celebrated.
Now do you see why I continue to tell you the ONLY way to educate students in this country today is homeschooling? The government school system is a total cesspool of ultra-liberal thought. It has NOTHING to do with educating. If you have children, you are seriously doing them harm by permitting them to attend a government-run school.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:02 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 305 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This is why I WILL make sure my children are home schooled, or at the very least, sent to private school!
Posted by: Smoke Eater at March 14, 2006 05:11 PM (5LGKd)
2
The very fact that these school officials elected to allow his students to have continued exposure to the treasonous, whiney shite says they do not belong in positions where they can make decisions affecting the education of children of any age.
The more of this crap I see, Ogre, the more I am convinced that you're absolutely right about home schooling being the answer.
Of course, these same leftists that fought the voucher program would undoubtedly do their best to fight home schooling, as forcing anti-American propaganda on America's young is a major part of their agenda. They need to keep the kids where they are captive audiences at all costs.
What they're doing, essentially, is integrating Komsomol into the "3 Rs".
Posted by: Seth at March 14, 2006 05:23 PM (asX5a)
3
Ogre, I have to disagree with you somewhat. I do not know the whole story since I have never been in contact with Mr. Bennish or listened to other discussions from him. I have personal experience with his teaching method. I had a teacher who would take what was and is mostly still considered controversial sides in matters that were in the news, abortion for one. I believe this is a good way to teach. It make people stand for what they believe and voice their opinions for us all to see why people believe in what they do. In the end we all learned something about ourselves and what others think and why.
I must admit that some of Mr. BennishÂ’s statements do seem too left sided and thus should not be stated. Most of the statements from the tape are biased both in what he says and in many writers cutting. I have yet to hear the whole discussion since it is hard for me to find a whole reproduction of it online. (I wonder if anyone can help me there.)
Smoke Eater, I know several kids who went to private schools. Most went to religious based schools. Please make sure you choose one that is not religious based. The difference between public schools and religious private schools is a poor education but with the ability to quote the bible. Not all are bad but I have yet to hear of one that is good. Just be careful of which school you send them too.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 14, 2006 05:36 PM (5+Jvh)
4
Not a big fan of homeschooling. You don't know what is being taught and there is potential for all sorts of socialization issues.
Posted by: Jack at March 14, 2006 06:03 PM (aFawc)
5
I have never been a fan of home schooling either, but if your local schools are not good then it should be an option. I am a fan of public schools in the sense that every child should have a school to go too. I agree with Ogre and many others that there is too much fat in most public schools. I would like to see the schools be more independent than they are now. I really think that school boards and superintendants be elected by the people. I also think that all established school districts be cut and earn money on their own. Besides what is the PTSA really for anyway?
The only reason I don't like Ogre's view on public schools is good (k-12 mind you) is that it will become a matter of money not your child's ability.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 14, 2006 06:13 PM (5+Jvh)
6
Arbitor - I do plan to stay away from parochial school, and the front-runner in my mind is Country Day in the Arlington/Fort Worth area (north Texas). I have never heard a bad word about this school in any area. They do have sports, and while their program is not as "important" as it is to most public schools, they do stress that being only athletic or only book smart is not good, but being active, athletic, smart (street and book), makes for a well rounded person.
Posted by: Smoke Eater at March 14, 2006 06:52 PM (5LGKd)
7
Sounds good to me. Shame I didn't live there. My school was somewhat like that though.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 14, 2006 07:20 PM (5+Jvh)
8
The moron on the government dole supported treason. He suggested that enemies of the US should "bomb North Carolilna." That's not instigating discussion, because he didn't invite discussion -- he actively suggested that others should bomb the US.
As for a tape, I know it's online, as I've heard it. I think Michelle Malkin has a link to it, I'll see if I can find it.
Jack -- the socialization issues about homeschooling are all dealt with -- they don't exist. It's an irrational fear that's spread by those who support government schools. By ALL measures in all tests, homeschool children are BETTER socialized than government school children.
As for the religious schools -- there are plenty that are absolutely top-notch because they DO teach academics instead of the pap that the government schools teach.
Posted by: Ogre at March 14, 2006 08:08 PM (/k+l4)
9
Oh, and don't forget, Arbitrator -- this was a GEOGRAPHY class! It doesn't require critical thinking to learn where the damn Amazon River is located!
Posted by: Ogre at March 14, 2006 08:19 PM (/k+l4)
10
I listened to the audio of TEACHER JAY BENNISH CAUGHT IN ANTI-AMERICAN RANT, with great interest. Also, with sadness.
My name is Michael Class. I live in the Seattle area with my wife and two children. I am a retired "dot-com" executive turned author, photographer, and publisher.
I was appalled at how some teachers presented American history to my children. My son and daughter learned that Thomas Jefferson had slaves—before they learned that he wrote the document articulating our rights and duties as free people. European settlers killed Native Americans with blankets infected with smallpox, they found out. That allegation upstaged the stories of courage, perseverance, and curiosity that defined the pioneers. My children knew that more than a hundred thousand people died when the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan, but they were not made to understand the moral context and the enormous scale of the conflict called World War II in which the atomic bomb story fit.
With a curriculum seemingly designed to instill guilt and shame, I wondered, how will my kids ever discover the lessons of history that inspire greatness and noble aspirations? Will they ever believe that they can make a difference? Will they have any heroes left at all? Then, I wondered: What would the heroes of AmericaÂ’s past say to the children of today?
I wrote, photographed, and published a book designed to set the record straight, to properly prepare our children for the future. My book is called Anthony and the Magic Picture Frame.ÂÂ
In the book, my real-life son, twelve-year-old Anthony, time-travels into the great events of the 20th century. Digital photographic “magic” places Anthony in the cockpit of the Spirit of St. Louis with Charles Lindbergh, on the moon with Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, in the laboratories of Thomas Edison and Jonas Salk, and on Normandy beach on D-Day. It looks as though Anthony really did meet Thomas Edison, Jonas Salk, FDR, Lou Gehrig, Charles Lindbergh, and Audie Murphy. And it’s all historically accurate: Even Anthony’s conversations with America’s heroes are based on things they really said. (See the photos: www.MagicPictureFrame.com)
While writing and photographing the book, I spoke with relatives of famous scientists and inventors, Holocaust survivors, award-winning biographers, and others who could help me ensure that the facts of the book were both accurate and vivid.ÂÂ
But the book goes beyond a simple recitation of historical facts: the book presents the moral lessons of American history. The chapter about Lindbergh’s flight is really about choosing one’s destiny. The story of Lou Gehrig is one of a virtuous life. The chapter about Thomas Edison is really about business. The story of Apollo 11 is about wonder, taking risks, and courage. The story of Dr. Jonas Salk and the cure for polio is really about dedicating one’s life to a higher purpose. When Anthony “meets” his immigrant great-grandfather at Ellis Island in 1907, it’s really a story about what it means to be an American. Anthony’s observation of D-Day and the liberation of the death camps during the Holocaust is a testament to the reality of evil and the need to fight it.
The book is meant to challenge the young reader. Many adults will find the book challenging, too. Anthony COMPARES the people and events of the past with the people and events of his own time. Anthony discusses the nature of good and evil, right and wrong, war and peace, what it means to be an American, honor and discipline, success and achievement, courage and destiny, marriage and family, God and purpose. AnthonyÂ’s observations prompt serious discussion of timeless moral questions. Anthony challenges the reader to think critically - to see the modern world in the light of the lessons of the past.ÂÂ
We can't afford to raise a generation of Americans who do not value their country, their heritage, and their place in the world. As Abraham Lincoln said: America is the "last best hope of earth."
Thank you.
Michael S. Class
Author / Photographer / Publisher
Anthony and the Magic Picture Frame: An American History Book for Right-Thinking Parents and Their Children
-----------------------
E-Mail: class@MagicPictureFrame.com
Web site: www.MagicPictureFrame.com
Posted by: michael class at March 14, 2006 10:24 PM (uQ06v)
11
Wow, that book looks great -- I think I shall have to order one! Thank you for stopping by, Michael.
Posted by: Ogre at March 14, 2006 10:33 PM (CyQ4M)
12
I listened to his speech and I can see where he does keep pushing his words and not letting anyone speak. It also seems as though no one is willing to speak up until later on. He did say things that shouldn't have been said. I still think that if he involved the students more and didn't say that the US was "bleesed by God." Many of the things he said were true. The bombing of North Carolina did actually make sense if you think of it the way he stated. Later on he did a good job of explaining how people believe we are the "terrorist." The Irag Iran conflict was rather well do from a third party perspective. He also explained how we have supported and commited acts of terrorism but didn't state why. I feel he desensitized the 911 attack but explained why the world believes different things. He did try to teach the students from different views.
All in all I am like everyone else in thinking that this should not be taught in a World Geography class. It was brought up over the State of The Union speech relating to current events which involves the class alittle but went too far. If he was teaching a civics class or politics class it would be acceptable.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 14, 2006 10:39 PM (5+Jvh)
13
I will have to take a look at that book too.
As a big fan of history and a recent college grad I still remember history classes and high school kids and their reactions. I just want to let you know that most of the history taught today will be forgotten tommorrow. I hate to say that but it is true. As for the losing of heroes, my school only taught alittle bit about the grief from WWII and more about the war itself. Infact we had a German exchange student who said it was taught similar to how Germany taught their students. We were taught many good things about Washington, Franklin, and Lincoln. Unfortunetly, like I said most will be forgotten.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at March 14, 2006 10:47 PM (5+Jvh)
14
The whole "official" complaint was that he presented all this ideas as facts and presented nothing for the other side. Statements like "Others should bomb North Carolina" are just wrong to make.
And Geography. Wacko leftist. Period.
Posted by: Ogre at March 14, 2006 10:50 PM (CyQ4M)
15
F***in' hippies.
If I wasn't a Christian I'd probably drive over and set that treasonous mother****er on fire.
Homeschooling rules, regardless of the made-up crap about it.
I hope we have much more of it in the future...
Posted by: jimmyb at March 15, 2006 12:56 AM (e39Jv)
16
If you were Muslim, you'd be expected to set SOMETHING on fire.
Posted by: Ogre at March 15, 2006 02:30 AM (CyQ4M)
17
Jack -- the socialization issues about homeschooling are all dealt with -- they don't exist. It's an irrational fear that's spread by those who support government schools. By ALL measures in all tests, homeschool children are BETTER socialized than government school children.
Ogre,
Sorry pal, I can't buy that argument. It is not an irrational fear to suggest that children who are homeschooled may have socialization issues.
It is not a given that it will happen, but it is a distinct possibility. The question is what kind of interaction do they have with other children. Are they exposed to others? Do they play with other kids?
What kind of background do their parents have? I know a lot of kids who were homeschooled who are better educated and more well adjusted than others and then I know some whose education is just abysmal.
Anyway, I'd be curious to see where you are getting your information. Not saying that you are wrong, but I am not just accepting it either.
Posted by: Jack at March 15, 2006 11:48 PM (aFawc)
18
I'll have to look around because I read a couple studies a couple years back -- sure, homeschooled kids might not be socially adjusted -- but so might other kids. The studies showed that by every possible measure that children who were homeschooled were better able to adjust socially than government schooled children.
And if you think about what goes on in government schools, I sure don't want children exposed to the "social adjustment" that goes on there.
Homeschool children typically interact with a large range of aged people, not just drones of their exact physical age.
Posted by: Ogre at March 16, 2006 12:45 AM (CyQ4M)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 08, 2006
Illegal Education Expenses
So, what could you do with an "extra" $210 million PER YEAR? The state of North Carolina has decided that the people of NC don't need that money, so they're going to take it and give it to people who openly break and flaunt the law. That's the current estimated cost of
educating criminal aliens.
Those who support such massive expenditures are quite generous with other people's money, of course, as all government agencies are. They will even point to the NC Constitution which guarantees a free education for the state's citizens -- but seem to miss the point that these are NOT state citizens, but are criminals who are actively breaking the law.
At what point does it become too expensive? Supporters will claim that having the criminals more educated will help everyone -- but how much is too much? Wouldn't the entire world be better off if everyone in Africa had a Ph.D. in some science? Why don't we just raise taxes enough to pay for that?
If you're not a citizen, if you're breaking the law by entering this country illegally, you are owed NOTHING. If you want an education, learn the language first.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:08 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I read all this and think about all the little hitlers we have in the U. S.All the people who watched shindlers list and said 'I would have never taken part in that". It's the same thing here and now,then it was required blonde hair and blue eyes made you a human now it comes down to what side of a line you were born on! Don't speak for me what an awful way to respect your ancestors who migrated here either due to the need americans had for workers during the first world war,or becouse they were the few left after the Mexican War when Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna sold Mexico's northern most territories to the U.S How un educated you all are I can read your statements but where is your proof? Spoiled bratz and greedy fools! I can bet that there is not one of you that can trace there family tree all the way back to start in the U. S Yeah thats right and you use to think it was cool that you were of another decent. You seem to forget the core of the battle is on immigration, So if you want to take away the rights of people born in the United States if there family tree was not started here then YEAH I will go but you have much farther to travel then I to get home. All I have to do is go to Texas. Why don't you show some respect for the ancestors and pay a visit to Ellis Island Do you even know what it is ? Do you know how your family got here? Read all the things about how immigration has hurt the U.S they are not just talking about people from Mexico there not the only ones nor are they the first to come here by boat! YOU WERE! it disgust me to watch you cry about how your education and culture is being stolen when if you actually were educated and knew anything about your culture you would not be putting your foot in your mouth!
Posted by: gcardenas at May 02, 2006 04:50 AM (wZLWV)
2
You, gcardenas, are a moron.
It's NOT about race or appearance, it's about CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. There's ZERO comparison between the illegal, criminal invasion of immigrants today and those who came to America to WORK through Ellis Island. On Ellis Island, the people OBEYED THE DAMN LAW! The people came here to WORK and didn't DEMAND FREE education, health care, housing, and everything else from those who ARE working. Get a clue or shut up.
Posted by: Ogre at May 02, 2006 11:25 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 07, 2006
Dangerous Weapons OK in schools
I can't say
this is really surprising in a Canadian school. The Canadian Supreme Court has ruled that bringing dangerous weapons to school is perfect okay with them, in a unnanimous 8-0 decision.
In a ruling based on religion, children are now allowed to take large metal knives with them to class. If you have kids, you are welcome to have them join my religion. It's called Cali-burr. Everyone has to carry a gun to be a member -- everywhere. And anyone who stops you is supressing your religion.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:05 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's right -- they're so consistent -- they want to disarm adults and arm children. Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
Posted by: Ogre at March 08, 2006 12:36 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2006
Judge Succeeds in Bloodless Coup in NC
Oh, did you miss that one in the news reports, too? Well, it's been rather slow-developing, but steady. If you know or watch anything regarding the news and education in North Carolina, I'm sure you will recognize the Leandro case and
King Supreme Ruler Almighty Judge Manning. He has elevated himself even above the governor.
In 2002, he replaced the NC legislature, completely usurping the power granted to them in the NC Constitution to determine all state spending. He ordered additional spending on schools, and the state accepted his imperial edict and increased spending to the tune of $22 million. In 2004, the state supreme court supported his coup and removal of the Legislature from the legislative process. But he wasn't done yet.
Not satisfied with the idea that 22-million extra dollars had absolutely no effect on education or grades, the leader of the coup has now taken over for the school boards, removing them from power. The judge has determined that he, and he alone, will shut down schools next year and "not allow them to open" if they do not meet his personal standards.
Apparently there's no need to elect a school board, because they are not allowed to run the school systems any more. Someone want to explain to me how this isn't a coup? Well, at least there wasn't any bloodshed with this clear change in government. Maybe we could revolt and try a representative republic in his place. I've heard those work good, at least for a hundred years or so.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
59kb generated in CPU 0.0597, elapsed 0.1126 seconds.
91 queries taking 0.0998 seconds, 223 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.