February 21, 2007
Observer Opposes Freedom
For those who read the Charlotte Observer,
their socialist position should come as no surprise. For those who actually read that paper and expect unbiased news, you'll be in for a rude awakening.
This time, they're supporting socialist education. They honestly believe that everyone else should pay for ANYONE who wants to go to college. They think that college should be completely "free" -- which means working people will have to pay for it, instead of the people who will actually attend and benefit from it. But that's how socialism works -- a few people work to support those who do not.
They're complaining not that the cost of education has gone up -- including salaries to their pals in the education bureaucracy -- but that the tuition might go up. They think that their friends and allies that work in education should get a lot more money, but they don't think that students who will gain the education and degrees should pay for it. Instead, those who are working should pay.
They do not care that the costs of higher education are rising across the country -- they don't think students should pay. Oh, and if you're not from North Carolina, they support you getting a free education here, too. Socialists unite in North Carolina behind the Socialist Charlotte Observer. Productive working people? Get out while you still can.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:03 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 236 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Here's the solution. Don't move. Everybody in N.C. stop working and go to college, you can be a student, too.
Posted by: Steph at February 21, 2007 01:25 PM (AC9Dc)
2
It's worse. Want to know some of the latest plans? Some representatives want to create new scholarships. Any person who works for 18 months at a minimum-wage job will not only get a free ride for college (all tution, fees, room and board, etc), they will ALSO continue getting paid their minimum wage without actually working! And yes, the taxpayers will foot that bill. So yes, it may be time to give up and just start being a leech on society. It may soon pay better than working.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2007 02:02 PM (oifEm)
3
how else do you expect the government to raise the next generation of sheep?
Posted by: chris at February 21, 2007 04:45 PM (rBjHa)
4
But, but, if they all quit working to go to school, who's going to be left to pay the taxes except for the government officials that told them they get a free ride... how long do you think it would take for the state to go bankrupt? Who wouldn't work for the 18 months(even at minimum wage)if they can ride for free for at least 4 years?
Posted by: Steph at February 21, 2007 05:42 PM (AC9Dc)
5
I'm actually looking into it. If the rules are as simple as they describe, I'm taking a second job at minimum wage so I can get 4+ years of free room, board, tuition, AND still free minimum wage. After all, the state will never run out of money -- it's run by Democrats -- they just raise taxes more.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2007 07:22 PM (oifEm)
6
But who are they going to tax if everyone is in school? The disabled? The too old or physically unable to attend college? The mentally disabled?
Posted by: Steph at February 21, 2007 08:12 PM (AC9Dc)
7
Every last person who is NOT in school -- anyone who is productive.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2007 08:15 PM (oifEm)
8
But that's the point of everyone quitting work to go back to school... there won't be anyone who is productive.
Posted by: Steph at February 21, 2007 08:49 PM (AC9Dc)
9
Well, once you finish school, presumably, you can work and pay for everyone else to go.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2007 08:52 PM (oifEm)
10
Nah... they can move out of the state where their degrees might mean something.
Posted by: Steph at February 21, 2007 09:01 PM (AC9Dc)
11
Hey, I don't make up these things, you'd have to ask the Democrats. I KNOW they don't work in a world filled with reality. But the Democrats DON'T CARE.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2007 09:04 PM (oifEm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 01, 2007
More Forced Association
Absolutely incredible. You are an innocent, law-abiding citizen. You're minding your own business. You're not breaking any laws and you're not disturbing anyone. Then, some government bureaucrat decides to tell you to be somewhere at 10am on Tuesday. No, it's not even to investigate wrongdoing. It's not as a witness to a crime. In fact, no crime has been committed.
In addition, the bureaucrat is not from the executive branch, nor are they associated in any way with law enforcement. They have nothing to do with taxes (other than living off yours). They have absolutely no force of law behind their request at all.
You, being rather busy doing something like working to earn enough to pay that bureaucrat's bloated salary, decide that you cannot get the time off from work and so you choose not to follow the bureaucrat's "request" to meet them on their terms at the time of their demanding.
In a free country, that would be the end of the story. However, the United States is not a free country. Instead, in Texas, if you DARE to refuse a non law-enforcement bureaucrat, they want to make that a misdemeanor crime that will cost you $500 and possible jail time.
Now go ahead and read the story and claim "it's for the children." That's crap. It's damn wrong, no matter how you frame it. To give unelected bureaucrats the power over people's lives like that is completely and totally wrong. If you want to hold parents responsible for their children, kick the children out of the school.
Of course, that will NEVER happen because schools don't do that at ALL any more. Short of committing a murder on school property, no child is ever removed from a public school. Heck, Charlotte openly welcomes convicted sex offenders into the classroom so others can experience diversity.
Some days I really wonder if there is any hope for freedom left anywhere on this planet.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:02 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 330 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Why don't these democrate liberals just take all our childern an put them in a school/Camp
and give us visition rights once a year. They
come up with these ideas just so people like them think there great, its just another way to that money and your childern away.
Fine, money.
Posted by: Terri Garr at February 01, 2007 03:25 PM (tIyxL)
2
They'd like to do that -- well, except for the part where you get to visit them once a year. But yes, all they want is your money and the ability to force-feed your children the idea that they should also give them money.
Posted by: Ogre at February 01, 2007 03:56 PM (pHUVv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
22kb generated in CPU 0.0402, elapsed 0.1558 seconds.
87 queries taking 0.1308 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.