October 21, 2005
FBI Investigates Jim Black
The FBI is continuing to
investigate North Carolina House Speaker Jim Black. Why? They're not saying.
Keep in mind, Jim Black is the one who has a chief fundraiser on his staff, one Meredith Norris. Meredith Norris is employed by Scientific Games. Scientific Games WROTE the legislation for the state lottery that passed the legislature. And Scientific Games is the company that "won" the contract to run the North Carolina state lottery.
Oh, and Jim Black suddenly "dismissed" Meredith Norris from her job several weeks ago.
Let's see, primary fundraiser for a politician employed by a company that stands to gain hundreds of millions of dollars from the state. And Mr. Black received over $100,000 in donations from the gambling industry in the last election cycle. Oh, and the FBI recently got convictions of two illegal gaming operators and a former Transportation Secretary.
I hope the FBI can get through the corruption on this one.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:04 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
Democrats Happy
Of course the Democrats are happy -- the Congress cannot
agree to cut spending. While the Republicans argue about what to cut and where to cut, with disagreements about where exactly to cut spending, the Democrats are smiling and happy because there appear to be no cuts.
This will be very interesting to watch, at least for me, because it really shows one of the very few supposed differences between the two parties. The result of this "fight" will help determine the party's standings and positions.
Normally, Democrats only increase taxes and increase spending. They're overjoyed when they can spend more money on quite literally anything other than defense. Historically, the Republicans attempt to reduce taxes and reduce spending.
So far in this Congress, the Republicans managed to reduce some taxes, but they've increased spending in massive amounts. They're considering reducing spending, but it doesn't look like they will. If they don't, this will show people where the Republican party at the national level really stands.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sen. Steven's threat to resign if his 'Bridge to Nowhere' is touched is especially arrogant.
Alaska raked in a cool $3 billion is pork - so his departure would only BENEFIT the Lower 49. Even GOP's south of the border would benefit if only a PORTION of his ration flowed into their districts, while the rest went to Gulf Coast relief.
The impact of the loss of his single GOP vote in the Senate (and he would probably be replaced with another GOP) versus the fiscal impact of his departure should be subjected to a cost/benefit analysis by the other Senators. He should be careful what he wishes for!
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 22, 2005 02:45 PM (DHd7J)
2
Oh yes, yes indeed! I had always been under the impression that Stevens was at least somewhat conservative. Now I see that even he doesn't have a conservative bone in his body. Absolutely -- let him quit!
Posted by: Ogre at October 23, 2005 10:07 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Corporate Donations
"Everyone knows" that corporations cannot make political donations. That's the law, according to some. That is the law that Tom Delay's been accused of violating -- that some corporate money was used in a political campaign. That's why he's been indicted, and why he's been arrested.
I'm eagerly awaiting the arrest of Charlotte Mayor Patrick McCrory.
The Charlotte Observer, "a Knight-Ridder publication" recently used approximately $2,000 worth of newspaper space to print their political advertisement for Mayor McCrory. In political terms, since it wasn't cash, it is considered an "in-kind" donation. So where's the DA?
Oh wait, "Free speech?" you cry? I agree. Now what's the difference? What is the difference between a corporation that happens to publish newspapers spending cash supporting their candidate and a company that make laundry detergent or a company that sells hot dogs spending cash supporting their candidate?
There is no difference.
If one company can spend money to help get some people elected, why can't all companies? Spending money is one of the primary ways to express freedom of speech. It's wrong to tell companies that only some, special, selected companies have free speech while others do not.
More corporate cash in elections wouldn't be great with today's bloated government, but if government were only doing what they were supposed to be doing, this would not be a problem.
I support free speech for everyone -- which includes anyone giving money to anyone they want to. I know -- it's a radical concept. I wonder where the ACLU is -- have they offered to defend Tom Delay's freedom of speech?
Posted by: Ogre at
06:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So corporations can pay taxes but cannot donate to political campaigns? Isn't that "taxation without representation", and isn't it the reason the founders went to war with King George?
(I ask somewhat sarcastically, Corporations are nothing but an illusion, and the idea that corporations pay taxes is a myth. Taxes are paid by individuals, even if they go to the IRS with a corporate name on the tax return and check.)
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 21, 2005 09:51 AM (K+h36)
2
No freedom of speech for you. In fact, I think it's time we send some people from the Gestapo, I mean the IRS, to come visit you...
Posted by: Ogre at October 21, 2005 10:25 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2005
Now I'm Mad about Wilma
Normally when hurricanes wander around, I don't get too excited. I lived for a few years in South Florida, and I was there when Andrew absolutely ripped through Dade County -- I lived about 5 miles north of the path of total destruction. So I know what these storms do and how they work.
I do worry a little about people that are in their path like the whole pile of Florida Bloggers, but I know most of them are prepared. I know many of them will suffer some problems, but it's unlikely that many of them will be killed.
Therefore, I don't worry much about these storms. I watch them to see where they're going; I keep an eye on them to see if their outer bands will send rain to North Carolina; and I watch them because they're amazing to look at through the eyes of scientific observation.
But now Wilma's got me really annoyed. Why? The Dolphins game has been moved to Friday night.
Now, if I were in Florida, that would be no big deal (except for the sudden lack of a all-morning long tailgate party). But I'm not. I pay piles of money to the NFL via DirectTV so I can watch the Dolphins games. The team is not good enough to rate much national coverage, so the networks here in North Carolina almost never carry a Dolphins game.
Now the game is on Friday. Last year, the Dolphins had a game rescheduled because of another storm. DirectTV couldn't coordinate the legal arrangements to get it broadcast. I'm betting that I'll be out of luck again this year, and I'll see no game on Friday night.
Damn Wilma! *Shaking fists at the wind like Harvey*
Posted by: Ogre at
03:46 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm only shaking my fist at Wilma because I want her to make way for Hurricane Alpha.
We've just GOT to set the hurricane record this year. We're SO close...
Posted by: Harvey at October 20, 2005 04:07 PM (ubhj8)
2
You could join Vox and me and become disappointed, disallusioned Viqueens fans! You'd have to have a Category 50 hurricane to have enough strength to get to Minnesota and do damage, and if we had something that bad you'd have bigger problems than a football game getting rescheduled!
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 20, 2005 04:17 PM (K+h36)
3
What are you willing to give in return for me posting on the game Friday night??? GRIN
Posted by: vw bug at October 20, 2005 04:50 PM (flzGe)
4
Damn Volkswagon ran over my reply...
"A" very small and compact cat-3 hurricane passed directly over me on my 6th birthday.
I peeked out of the backdoor at "halftime" and I can tell ya that there is no other journey quite like the one to the eye of the storm.
Speaking of propaganda... some developers, meteorogists and politicians need to have their asses hung out to dry for lowering the building codes under knowingly false pretenses.
They lied to line their pockets... in other words.
Posted by: island at October 20, 2005 06:06 PM (nnd3H)
5
You should really complain to DirecTV if they pull that sh*t and get some money back. They charge you an arm an a leg for those packages, and you shouldn't be screwed like that.
Posted by: RyeBrye at October 20, 2005 10:27 PM (1pkmO)
6
Setting records is ALWAYS fun. GO ALPHA!
And Zoe -- they still have a team up there? Oh right, there was almost a scandal, but no one really cares.
VW, I might be willing to pay for live blogging on this one -- but I want eyewitness reports!
Island, I remember a few years back when Miami played Pittsburg...during a hurricane. That's the NFL *I* remember -- there's no such thing as delays or cancellations because of WEATHER.
RyeBrye, I complained up a storm last year when it happened, and DirectTV blamed it on the NFL for scheduling or licensing issues.
And thanks for stopping by, everyone!
Posted by: Ogre at October 21, 2005 07:01 AM (/k+l4)
7
I have no issues with Alpha if it is directed at Wisconsin... No issues at all. Otherwise, I have no desire for record setting. Just sayin'..
Posted by: Bou at October 21, 2005 04:06 PM (5JHEt)
8
I'll put a call into BushRove's Weather Machine House and see if they can point one that way. I'm sure they can.
Posted by: Ogre at October 21, 2005 05:05 PM (iJFc9)
9
It's 24 (KC) to 13 (MIA)... at 9:25pm EST. Just say'n
Posted by: VW Bug at October 21, 2005 09:25 PM (flzGe)
10
Besides, I'm not sure why you aren't subscribed to: http://www.watch-football.tv/
(snicker snicker)
Posted by: VW Bug at October 21, 2005 09:27 PM (flzGe)
11
Ok Ok... you can really get the info here:
http://sports.guide.real.com/
but you will have to pay for it. Live! Probably better than what you have now. ;-)
Posted by: VW Bug at October 21, 2005 09:31 PM (flzGe)
12
I thought teams were supposed to get better after having the #2 draft pick.
Thanks, VW, I finally found a live radio feed from an AM station in Miami so I could at least listen to the destruction.
Posted by: Ogre at October 22, 2005 07:46 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACLU Supports Voter Fraud
Time for the weekly
Stop the ACLU Blogburst. The weekly blogburst is to point out the true goals of the ACLU and help to point out to the general public where and when the ACLU opposes freedom, as they quite often do.
This week, the ACLU decides to support voter fraud, and they win, finding a federal judge who also believes in voter fraud, opposing the people of the state and the legislature of the state. The ACLU wants to continue to allow voter fraud so they can change the will of the people and valid elections.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
11:01 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1382 words, total size 9 kb.
1
Reading what you just wrote gives me a headache. This is why I stayed out of politics. I would be in jail for murder by now.
Posted by: vw bug at October 20, 2005 01:10 PM (flzGe)
2
And I hate when people say things like, "That's the way the game is played." It's not supposed to be a game -- this is real.
Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 01:18 PM (/k+l4)
3
OK it isn't the same as a poll tax but if you want this law, and I do, you have to be willing to do certain things. You have to be willing to open offices of places that provide State issued photo ID's in poor neighborhoods as people with less money are less likely to have cars to transport them to these offices. Also you are going to have to offer these ID's free of charge to people who can't afford them. You are also going to have to keep these offices open some nights and weekends because lots of people--particularly the working poor--can't afford to take time off to do this. If you do these things and make it fair your law will pass and not be considered discriminatory or anything like a poll tax.
Chris
Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 09:17 PM (M7kiy)
4
Your site won't accept my url it says it is questionable content. twob-a-b-e-sandabrain.typepad.com
Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 09:18 PM (M7kiy)
5
Sorry it didn't take you site -- the spam filter catches b-abes* because of the massive amount of porn spamming that comes in looking like that.
But yet, the IDs ARE FREE! If you cannot afford them, THEY ARE FREE.
And the offices don't need to stay open any longer -- these people managed to get registered to vote, didn't they? If they can get registered to vote, they can get their IDs at the same time.
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 09:21 PM (iJFc9)
6
Well, um yeah they did manage to register to vote, but most places you can do that by filling out a form and mailing it in or you can fill out the form at the supermarket when they have a voter registration drive or when someone knocks on your door for a party or a candidate and asks you if you want to register to vote--so unless you plan to issue ID cards through the mail, which would seem to defeat the purpose of your law, you are going to have to keep the offices open some evenings and some weekends
Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 11:28 PM (M7kiy)
7
I still just don't understand the opposition to this law. Well, that's not quite right, I do understand the opposition -- the ACLU and Democrats honestly want to continue fraudulent voting.
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 05:34 AM (iJFc9)
8
The opposition to the law is as I explained it. It gives an unfair advantage to those with cars, and jobs they can afford to take time off from or people who don't have to work and people who don't have the money to pay for a photo id. What is your objection to my suggestions? Or are you really trying to supress the vote of the poor.If all you want to do is insure that people who vote are who they say they are and that they are allowed to vote then there should be no objection to the things that would make it a fair law.
Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 07:53 AM (M7kiy)
9
The primary opposition to the law is that the poor cannot afford IDs. That's a total fabrication because the damn IDs are free.
Your argument is bordering on insanity now -- requiring IDs gives advantages to people who have jobs because those who have jobs can take time AWAY from their job to get IDs while those who have NO jobs don't have TIME to get an ID? So what are these poor, jobless people doing all day that they don't have TIME to stop by and get an ID? And again, if they have time to REGISTER TO VOTE, how is it that they don't have time to get an ID?
You apparently have completely bought into the ACLU and NAACP support of continuing fraudulent voting when you keep saying that the poor cannot afford something that's FREE!
THE ID CARD IS FREE. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ANY MONEY FOR IT. IF YOU ARE POOR, THEY WILL NOT ASK YOU FOR MONEY BECAUSE THE ID IS FREE.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 07:59 AM (/k+l4)
10
Slow down...go back...read. I said the working poor, dear.
Slow down...go back...read. You can register to vote by mail.
Not sure where you live, but the State ID card here is NOT FREE!
Again, what are your objections to keeping the office open longer on some days and on weekends and putting them in locations that are easily accesible by those with out cars?
Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 09:01 AM (M7kiy)
11
"Working poor." Define. At exactly what dollar level does one become "working poor?" Does that count for teenagers working? What about unskilled workers? What about drug dealers who have no IRS wages? I don't accept "working poor" as a valid description of people.
I'm not sure why you're not getting the "free" part.
FoxNews: "The governor said such cards would be given free to those who cannot afford the fee."
Washington Times: "[id] such cards would be given to those who cannot afford the fee."
USA Today: "The governor said such cards would be given free to those who cannot afford the fee."
Neal Boortz: " For voters without driver's licenses, the state was going to issue free picture IDs. Free .. that means no cost."
And if that's not enough, refer to Georgia Public Law 40-5-103 (a):
"The department shall not be authorized to collect a fee for an identification card from any person who swears under oath that he or she is indigent and cannot pay the free for an identification card, that he or she desires an identification card in order to vote in a primary or election in Georgia"
The damn thing IS free!
My objection is to giving special privileges to people without merit.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 10:12 AM (/k+l4)
12
You still haven't answered the question--how is insuring equal access to the id cards special treatment. I'm not arguing with you anymore you obviously don't have a coherent answer.
Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 03:34 PM (M7kiy)
13
It's not equal access. The way you have defined it, it's only fair if each and every person has a voting place within 100 feet of their front door.
There is no unequal distribution of facilities. By placing more facilities in some areas, that is special treatment. That is unequal.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 03:54 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
County Commissioner wants to punish criminals!
Reading that headline, you might think that there's no news story here. Very unfortunately there is -- because he's very likely to fail in his efforts.
In the state of North Carolina, primary funding for the department of corrections and courts comes from the state. The state legislature determines which counties get how much money.
The courts are massively short money these days because the Democrats who run the legislature do not want to fund them. Instead, the Democrats want to fund oyster farms and other wastes of money. When it comes to one of the very few things government is actually supposed to do, they cannot find the money.
Currently, the courts are so overwhelmed they are considering putting ALL civil cases on hold, just so they can deal with criminal courts. In Mecklenburg, the court and "justice" system is so bad that if you commit murder in Charlotte in plain sight of the police, you only have a 50/50 change of going to jail -- they just don't have the prosecutors or the jail space.
So one county council member has proposed actually funding the court system. He proposes increasing funding from the county to actually pay for the courts, hiring DAs, and increasing jail space. As you might imagine, he's not going to get very far in the Democrat-controlled council.
Why? Because Democrats honestly believe in spending money on other programs and seriously do not like punishing criminals. Some will complain that it's the state's job and that the county shouldn't get involved (no matter that the crimes are still increasing).
Still others will use this as an excuse to raise taxes even more. That's what Democrats prefer to do -- use quite literally anything as an excuse to raise taxes. Hey morons, how about reducing the funding for "after school programs" and spend money locking up actual criminals?
But no, that wouldn't fit into the liberal worldview. After all, according to the Democrats in North Carolina, they'd rather allow a hundred rapists and murders go free than deprive one child of state-sponsored entertainment for an hour in the afternoon.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 365 words, total size 2 kb.
1
hence the name Moonbats ..lalalalalal looneys
Posted by: gina at October 20, 2005 02:18 PM (RJbeU)
2
Go figure, huh, Gina? Thanks for stopping by!
Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 02:32 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC Children, According the to State
I'm not trying to take over as the blog to visit to see media bias, but sometimes I just have to point these things out. The Charlotte Observer staff and editorial board are socialists. They honestly believe that only they and government should determine all that is good and right. They seriously oppose anything that even hints at freedom -- economic, personal, or religious.
This can be seen on any day by reading nearly any article by their usual staff. Eric Frazier joins this chorus of total socialists by declaring "NC Kids Healthier and Safer"
So, what's his example of healthier and safer?
64% more children enrolled in government "early intervention programs." In other words, 64% more children being raised by the state in the way the state wants them -- taught to accept the state as master and god.
33% less children pregnant (age 15-17 only). He leaves out the increase in pregnancies for under age 15, an increase in unwed mothers, and no increase in the prosecution of males over age 18 who caused those pregnancies in girls under age 18.
21% more children age 12-18 who are poor that are now overweight. So these poor children don't seem to be having any trouble getting food -- let's just give them even more money so they'll buy "better" food.
33% more children on the public dole getting insurance paid for by working individuals. Of course, this leaves out the number of people who are working who cannot afford insurance because they are forced to pay for all the damn lazy-ass people who won't work.
This is only a success in a government-run state. This is great if you're in a communist country. This is exactly how today's left and today's Democrats measure success -- the more people dependent on government, the more successful people are.
I guess I'm a total failure -- and I'm sure in the eyes of Eric Frazier and other socialists, communists, and others opposed to freedom, I am -- because I work hard instead of waiting for government.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:04 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 356 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Shoot, I guess I'm a failure too. Perhaps I should just declare bankruptcy, quit my job and let Pennsylvania take care of me. I always wanted to be a success!
Posted by: oddybobo at October 20, 2005 08:24 AM (6Gm0j)
2
Come on, Oddy, let's go be a success together! I know a 7-11 that cashes government checks and has cheap Thunderbird! Then we will be truly successful (in the eyes of government).
Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 08:57 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2005
Fancy Links
Hey, just to point out a couple new things here. First, there's this logo:

I'll be adding that to the sidebar. It's a link to the Mission Impossible:III web site. That movie comes out 5-5-2006, so it's a ways off, but I should have some inside info as it becomes available, including first run previews, so watch that link!
Next up, over there on the left, way at the top of the sidebar, is a thumbnail of a blog with "Rent My Blog Now" below it. This is a new blog exchange thing where you can buy or rent space on other's blogs with Blog Explosion.
First, if you're not a member of Blog Explosion, become one now. Just follow that link and sign up (it costs $0). You can then surf and exchange lots of neat stuff with other blogs.
Once you're a member, you can buy and rent space on other member's blogs. This week, Conservative Nation has graciously rented space on this fine blog. That blog is by a "very conservative right-winger" from PA -- and a college student! I didn't think that was possible. Why not click through and see what else he's got to say?
Posted by: Ogre at
08:32 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Above the link for renting your blog is a notice that says if I arrived in a frame I am at your site....never mind where I'm at, why the hell am I in this frame? Am I going to be hung? And if someone is going to hang me, are the going to hang me in a house? Or a museum?
I think I would like to be hung in the Playboy Mansion....but damn it....the question remains; What am I doing in this frame and how did I get here?
Posted by: Kender at October 20, 2005 03:28 AM (CfDyC)
2
I think you've BEEN framed...
Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 05:45 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Citizen Legislators
Another week, another good series of questions for the weekly
Christian Views Symposium. Each week Lennie of
Cross Blogging asks a question or series of questions. Everyone is then encouraged to answer those questions in the comments or on their own blog: feel free to join in!
This week the questions are about citizen legislatures and career legislatures. I've studied this quite a bit in North Carolina, as Lennie has in IL, as can be seen in his post for this week. His specific questions are:
1. Is there a lack of the working class entering politics today?
2. If there is, what can be done to reverse this trend?
3. Would term limits be an effective method of enticing the working class back into the political arena?
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
02:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 755 words, total size 5 kb.
Miers Doomed
Is Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers doomed? It certainly appears so. You see, with
the revelation that she actually supported banning abortion, and is on the record as supporting it, all bets are off.
Now the Democrats (including Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe, Lincoln Chaffe, John McCain, and others) have their reason to oppose her. With Democrats, abortion is a litmus test -- you simply cannot oppose abortion at any time, in any place, ever in your life, or you are not accepted in a national position of the Democrat Party.
If the Democrats unify behind their leader in opposing her, as they likely will, it will only take a few Republicans to completely derail her nomination. The RINOs will likely join with the Democrats because of the abortion issue (note that you can be pro- or anti-abortion and still be a Republican).
In addition, if just one or two conservative Republican (okay, if there were any) Senators also oppose her for any reason, she's done.
I'm not pretending to have an inside track into Washington, but if the Democrats form into a mass blob of unity, as they are wont to do, I can see this nomination suddenly being withdrawn. It won't likely be Bush that withdraws her, as that would be admitting defeat.
Instead, I think Miers will come up with a "personal issue," or give some other reason to withdraw her own nomination. The Democrats aren't the only group that doesn't like her.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:05 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I don't like her either! But mostly cause I want the job.
Posted by: oddybobo at October 19, 2005 01:37 PM (6Gm0j)
2
I'll send Bush another email and drop your name in there. Maybe he'll listen this time.
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 01:40 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Immigration NOT a priority
In case you actually thought that immigration (illegal immigration, crimes, security, etc.) was important to the US Senate, Sen. John Cornyn helps
confirm that it's not. Of course,
GOP leaders in the House and Senate have stressed that immigration reform remains near the top of the legislative agenda
"Near the top." You can presume that to be somewhere in the top 1,000 things they want to do within the next 20 years -- because they're sure not doing anything about it now -- they're too busy taking money from productive people to give to others.
I spoke with my Congressional Representative a number of months ago about immigration at a town meeting. Every single person in the room wanted something done and done now. His answer?
Sorry, we just can't get everyone to agree on whether to build a fence or have a guest worker program or something else.
Great. We need help and Congress refuses to do one of the few things they are legitimately Constitutionally allowed to do because they can't agree. Yet they can all always agree to waste billions of dollars on giveaways to buy votes. What a steaming pile of you-know-what Congress has become. And yes, I'll say that to their faces.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:09 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey Ogre, my (American) fiance & I have been looking for somewhere to move to in a couple of years, California being stuffed full of too many Californians 'n all.
I spent a couple of days in Raleigh about 5 years back (visiting Ericsson), and went to an awesome Megadeth concert while I was there (had a scary moment when one of my earplugs fell out).
I remember Raleigh as a pretty good place - would you recommend it, or do you have too many darn foreigners there already?

P.S - going to grab one of those Ogre BlogAd spaces soon, can't do it yet since the banner I have is 180x150 pixels
Posted by: GeekBrit at October 19, 2005 02:18 PM (Oi3lh)
2
Well...I'm not intimately familiar with the foreigners situation in Raleigh, as I'm closer to Charlotte. I'm willing to bet the situation is very similar, however.
Charlotte is an area where few people stay. There is a huge Mexican population (including gangs) because of the social programs and free...well, everything. Most of the people who live in Charlotte (other than the ruling class) have recently moved here due to jobs.
A large number of people who have lived in Charlotte for 5+ years move out of Charlotte to escape it's high taxes, poor schools, and high crime rate.
The political atmosphere in North Carolina is very liberal Democrat. There are no restraints on spending and increases in taxes occur very regularly each year on the state, county, and city level.
If you're looking for somewhere with lots of freedom, I'd suggest New Hampshire. If you're a big fan of the liberal way of life, North Carolina will do well. The only remenant of conservatism in North Carolina is church -- you will find one on every corner. If that makes you uncomfortable, you do not want to come here!
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 02:28 PM (/k+l4)
3
Interesting - thanks for that, the gang situation sounds like it's worth avoiding, but then just 50 miles away from here gang activity is rife in LA, yet this area seems free of it.
G is from NH, she's saying that the work situation is dire there. Do you think there may be a corollary between Conservative Freedom and poor employment rates?
Posted by: GeekBrit at October 19, 2005 02:40 PM (Oi3lh)
4
The only correlation between freedom and employment is government employment -- the less freedom you have, the more government employment.
The work situation is NH is good for some and not good for others. IT is growing there just like everywhere else. NH just doesn't have the growing population that NC does. The weather and government bribes are bringing employment to North Carolina more than New Hampshire.
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 08:13 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Separation of States and Church and Federalism
I was reading
an article in the local communist propaganda pamphlet, the Charlotte Observer, when I was shocked. In this article, it was actually suggested that these two statements made by the Supreme Court in 1947 were wrong:
(1) under the 14th Amendment of 1868 (granting citizenship to former slaves), the establishment clause was "incorporated" against the states, restricting them, rather than protecting state prerogatives; and (2) the establishment clause was not confined to prohibiting a national church, but erected a wide-ranging "wall of separation between Church and State."
I was absolutely shocked because that's absolutely correct -- these statements are way out of line with the Constitution. However, the article even went further, suggesting that the 2004 Newdow case could actually overturn these horrible rulings!
Justice Clarence Thomas suggested reconsideration of this misbegotten jurisprudence. "[I]t makes little sense to incorporate the establishment clause" against the states, he said.
Wow. What a concept. Can you imagine if states actually had rights? Can you imagine if the people of a state were actually free to determine their own laws? What a radical concept. I often dream of such a day of such a powerful expansion of freedom. I wish there were something I could do to hurry to usher in such a great thing. Unfortunately, we're at the mercy of the oligarchs in this area.
Then I read the byline -- the article was written by Tom Ashcraft. He is the opposite of the Observer editorial board -- someone who supports freedom himself, and a good and honest man. Nice job, Tom. Now I can only hope the Supreme Court is listening.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:08 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 285 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Good luck ... and can you send Tom to Florida?
Posted by: vw bug at October 19, 2005 02:13 PM (MNp8q)
2
I've talked to him at length before -- he's absolutely determined to work within the system of North Carolina and fix it. I haven't called him Don Quiote to his face, but...
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 02:24 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Must Have Oysters
The utter wasteful spending continues in the North Carolina General Assembly. Just over $1 million was given away by the legislature for "oyster rehabilitation programs" and the oyster hatcheries at the North Carolina aquariums. What a total damn waste of good money.
But wait, it's costing more now! A legislative committee is going to get a tour of the oyster hatcheries and have someone explain to them why it's so important that we spend so much money "rehabilitating" oysters. They're serious.
And this will cost MORE money because the people giving the tour will be paid with taxpayer funds; the legislative staff will be sure to use tax money to pay for their trip; and you can bet there will be catered meals, paid for with more tax money.
They will also have "business meetings" where they will use more taxpayer money for more per diem spending, taxpayer owned buildings, and where lobbyists will ask for even MORE money for the next year for marine fisheries, mullet fisheries, and shrimp fishery management.
Yes, this is your North Carolina Democrat at work -- spending as much as often as they can.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 196 words, total size 1 kb.
October 18, 2005
Carnival, carnival!
Time to point out a couple carnivals that include good reading for this week!
First up, a really good carnival that you should commit some time to reading -- and it won't take long at all. This is the New Blog Carnival Showcase. This carnival is designed to give some exposure to new blogs. Perhaps you remember when you wanted someone, ANYONE to read and comment on your blog?
If you do (heck, even if you don't), this week you can head over to Everyman Chronicles and see the new entries. The new people really appreciate comments, so just take a minute and say hello!
The second carnival is one that I link to every week, even if I don't have time to submit an entry or even read the whole thing. It's a great carnival that highlights some of the best and worst that's going on in America today concerning freedom.
Of course, I'm talking about the Carnival of Liberty up this week at Searchlight Crusade (not to be confused with the Carnival of True Liberties). Both these carnivals highlight the loss (or retention) of various freedoms in this country. Take a look, they're good.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:04 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes we didn't have any submissions for the carnival this week which surprised me a bit so I had to do some digging. I found six different blogs each new with some quality content. Go over and check them out.
Posted by: Everyman at October 18, 2005 09:58 PM (A/oHQ)
2
On the bright side, Tag, you're it! http://www.thepiratescove.us/2005/10/aclu_whats_your.html
You will like this meme, it is anti-ACLU
Posted by: William Teach at October 18, 2005 10:00 PM (eSZb/)
3
Hope you don't mind me using your comment section to help publicise my blog
Support Enviroman
It is for a good cause, for the good of all of us. Thanks
Support Enviroman, and you support yourself, your children, your grandchildren, your great-grandchildren....
Posted by: Enviroman at October 19, 2005 03:55 AM (dm22t)
4
Sure, go ahead, Environman.
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 05:59 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Supreme Court Morons
Well the Supreme Court has struck again. As happens way too often, they are absolutely and totally wrong. In
this case, they have ruled that you have a Constitutional right to fuel, taxpayer money, and the labor of others. So much for freedom.
At issue here are the rights of a prisoner -- convicted of a crime by a jury of her peers and sentenced to jail time. This woman, who is so confident of her rights that she refused to allow her name to be used in the lawsuit, got pregnant. She then decided that she wanted an abortion -- but she was in prison.
The State of Missouri has decided that they do not want to pay for abortions with taxpayer money. Despite being a prisoner, where one has already violated the laws and rules of society where one loses some rights, a federal judge decided that this woman still had, somehow, a Constitutional right to an abortion.
But that's not all. This is not just about abortion. You see, the prison did not have the ability to give her an abortion. Therefore, the federal judge decided that this woman also had the right to gasoline to provide her a ride to the abortion clinic. AND she had a right to the labor of guards to provide her that transport and security on the trip.
That's just wrong in so many ways. I'd love to see a little more civil disobedience when people are ordered to provide their labor for the "rights" of others. Sorry, people, your rights do not supersede my rights -- and I won't let you take them from me while I still live.
If this ruling is applied across the board, I could demand the taxpayers buy me a printing press. I have a right to freedom of speech, right? Therefore, logically, if the taxpayers do not provide me with a printing press and a staff to run my newspaper, my right to freedom of speech is being violated. That is what this judge and the Supreme Court have ruled.
Damn, where's my country?
Posted by: Ogre at
01:06 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 356 words, total size 2 kb.
1
so, you'd rather pay for a lifetime of supporting a child who would have ended up in the foster care system, rather than this? I mean, if you're going to raise hell for some moral reason, that's one thing, but this argument doesn't even make any sense. If you're concerned about your tax dollars, be glad the judge decided this way, rather than the opposite - you get off cheaper this way.
Posted by: Erin Monahan at October 18, 2005 10:23 PM (vtVgw)
2
Erin, I'd just like to point out that your comment does not touch on the issue Ogre has posted about.
The point is that the courts are once again "legislating from the bench" by putting words in the Constitution's "mouth" that are not part of the Constitution and by my read, each of these tamperings with what are and aren't American rights bring us closer and closer to socialism, the antithesis of our extremely successful form of government.
Every time this happens, a legal precedent is set.
Posted by: Seth at October 18, 2005 11:16 PM (+YZMv)
3
Yes, it's not about the money spent, it about the sources of that money -- the judges have determined that other people somehow have a right not only to other's money, but to their labor as well.
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 05:57 AM (iJFc9)
4
Erin, for me, yes I would rather see a life saved and supported than destroyed and aborted.
This argument you use-- WOULD YOU RATHER PAY FOR A LIFETIME of SUPPORTING A CHILD....is old and lame. It's the expected rhetoric from liberals who have brainwashed people like you into believing this to be fact!
There are other options besides abortion. And the government should not have to pay for this. THAT government is me, you (I'm assuming you work and pay taxes) and everyone else who works for a living.
Posted by: Raven at October 19, 2005 09:19 AM (3kz8d)
5
And in a free country, that wouldn't be an issue because *I* wouldn't be forced to pay for someone else's bad decisions -- THEY would.
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 09:56 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FEMA Needs to Expand?
Great. Have you seen the recent news regarding FEMA? All the news reports and government reports claim that FEMA didn't have enough -- money, control, power, organization, whatever -- just not enough.
Why? Because they want more.
FEMA has already given hundreds of millions of dollars away, and they're slated to give away BILLIONS in total. Keep in mind that money is being used in strip bars and to provide hotel service for victims. Also keep in mind if you're productive, YOU paid for that money.
There's something that simply isn't said enough, and is never said in the formerly mainstream media:
GOVERNMENT HAS NO MONEY OTHER THAN WHAT THEY TAKE FROM PRODUCTIVE PEOPLE
All these "hearings" and discussions about FEMA are all pre-ordained to have one result and only one result: FEMA needs more money. That's wrong.
FEMA should not provide food, shelter, or medical care for anyone. Who responded first and best in the emergency? People. Churches. Civic organizations. Who responded worst? Government.
It is NOT charity to steal from Peter to give to Paul.
Update: TomSlick provides us with The Source of FEMA.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:04 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 194 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What happens if I become an unproductive member of society then? Well, I gues you'd have to take care of me! I'd like to add a bathroom at my place, your share comes to $ .94
Posted by: oddybobo at October 18, 2005 11:21 AM (6Gm0j)
2
This is worse than you're saying. I don't buy for a minute that FEMA exists to help people in national emargencies. They exist soley to deprive citizens of Constitutionally protected rights under the guise of aid.
A friend of mine grew up in East Grand Forks, Minnesota. When the big floods hit back in 1997, her family was FORCED to leave their home by FEMA. Why? Who knows. They lived miles from the flooding Red River.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 18, 2005 11:43 AM (K+h36)
3
Oddy -- sorry, but I'm getting tired of pulling the wagon. I think I'm going to jump in, too. And I want beer. Buy it for me now. It's only 1 cent to you (and everyone else), so that's reasonable, right?
And Echo, yes, FEMA is a bad organization. However, government, as it always does, can only attempt to solve a problem with MORE government. FEMA should be disbanded, NOT expanded. You example is only one I've seen of massive abuses of basic rights by FEMA -- and certainly not the last.
Posted by: Ogre at October 18, 2005 11:56 AM (/k+l4)
4
Ogre, if we both stop pulling the wagon, who'll take over? Therein lies the solution! Everyone stop pulling the wagon. Just stop. I know I can take care of my own so I'll be just dandy.
Posted by: oddybobo at October 18, 2005 12:17 PM (6Gm0j)
5
And one day that might happen. Ever read Atlas Shrugged?
Posted by: Ogre at October 18, 2005 12:56 PM (/k+l4)
6
I think the original thought was good-this FEMA thing. But now it's just aother government program that thinks it should have HUGE funding. We don't need FEMA. If everyone else just did their damn jobs, FEMA would not be around. Too many federal level programs exist just so that other fed programs can exist, I say.
LOL
Posted by: Raven at October 19, 2005 09:23 AM (3kz8d)
7
I'm not convinced the original idea of FEMA was a good idea. What was the original purpose of FEMA, does anyone know?
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 09:58 AM (/k+l4)
8
You just had to ask that didn't you?
FEMA had one original concept when it was created, to assure the survivability of the United States government in the event of a nuclear attack on this nation.
Interesting and somewhat disturbing article here if you get a chance to read it.
http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/gvcon6.html
Posted by: Tomslick at October 19, 2005 01:28 PM (xNjHI)
9
Man, that's nasty. Just more reasons to completely get rid of the entire concept of FEMA. Then again, this is the US government so there's absolutely no way they will ever shrink in any way, shape, or form.
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 01:39 PM (/k+l4)
10
That is hard to believe isn't it? I can't vouch for article, I just thought it was a tad bizarre when I read it. Does anyone know anything about this writer? The article did seem like a conspiracy rant and the LA Times vouches for him.
I found this about the writer.
Harry V. Martin
Mr. Martin, a 28-year journalist who has worked throughout the Pacific Basin, is publisher of the Napa Sentinel (a weekly newspaper) and the North American Investigative Journal. He is former publisher of Defense Systems Review and Military Communications, and former Editorial Director of Defense Electronics, International Countermeasures Handbook, Military Electronics and Countermeasures, Microwave Systems News, and Military Science and Technology. He is an elected public official, and has been referred to by the Los Angeles Times as the Thomas Paine of the Patriot Movement.
Posted by: Tomslick at October 19, 2005 01:56 PM (xNjHI)
11
Well, if he's an elected public official, certainly we, the peons, shouldn't be questioning him, now should we?
Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2005 02:07 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Nazis proven correct
Nazis were planning a rally in Toledo, Ohio to complain about the influence of gangs in the area. The march was because the Nazis were trying to show that the neighborhood had been overtaken by gangs who threatened all the people in the area, including whites. The gangs then proceeded to confirm what the Nazis said.
Large numbers of police were mobilized. Before the march started, gangs materialized and started destroying the neighborhood. Even the mayor admitted that he couldn't stop the violence.
More than 100 people were arrested. Terrance Anderson, a bar owner, was angry. Oh, and his bar was destroyed -- it is not known if he destroyed it himself in his own fit of rage or if the gangs that were being protested destroyed it because they didn't like him. 12 police officers were arrested.
But it's not anyone's fault. Donna Reid's two sons were arrested on felony charges, but she cannot understand why. Hey Donna -- it's because they participated in a riot!
So, what is being done about this gang problem now that it's been pointed out? The same thing Charlotte does -- simply deny there's a problem and do nothing. No one, from the city "leaders" on down, has placed any blame on the people who actually attacked police, burned cars, and destroyed businesses.
Michele Malkin has more details.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:05 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 231 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ok, let me be the first to place blame: "Those damn Nazis!"

What? Wrong blame, how about, "Those damn Ogres!"
Posted by: oddybobo at October 18, 2005 09:43 AM (6Gm0j)
2
Those damn beheaded Ogres!
Posted by: Ogre at October 18, 2005 09:49 AM (/k+l4)
3
you read it wrong too! I eat drifters and behead yokels!
Posted by: oddybobo at October 18, 2005 10:36 AM (6Gm0j)
4
Oh, you SO did not have to go there...
Posted by: Ogre at October 18, 2005 10:57 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC Lottery Ethics
The new chairman of the North Carolina
Illegal Legal, but only if the government does it gambling lottery claims he wants the lottery to be "ethical." Greensboro's News and Record
gets this one right when the editors say, "He's got his work cut out for him."
Keep in mind, the lottery was passed under very suspicious circumstances when one senator who didn't support the lottery was on an expensive honeymoon and another was suddenly absent with an "undisclosed leg injury."
Later it was revealed that the company awarded the Lottery contracts (Scientific Games) had an employee that was a top fund-raiser for Jim Black, Speaker of the House. So yes, Scientific Games LITERALLY bought that contract from Jim Black.
Oh, and Scientific Games WROTE the lottery law -- worded specifically to ensure that Scientific Games would get the lottery contract. And of course, it will only be a matter of time before the additional corruption and misuse of money "earned" by the lottery will be revealed.
Thank you, North Carolina Democrats, for making North Carolina politics even dirtier.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
October 17, 2005
7 Things
Ah well. It appears that people still haven't learned that you shouldn't tag an Ogre.
Tammi at least
admits that she's asking for it this time when she sends along this meme called "7 things."
Now, while Tammi did at least make the attempt to help me understand these incredibly silly things with a comment at the very end of her post, she neglected the most important part of the meme and tagging game -- the instructions!
Therefore, according to the official rules of memes, I am allowed and encouraged to make up my own instructions and follow them as I make them. Sorry, Tammi, but them's the rules!
First new rule: the number 7 is not allowed.
Some things I do not want to do before I die:
See Hillary Clinton elected...for anything.
See World Peace -- think of all the unemployed soldiers, defense contractors, and military support people! Do you want all these people to be on welfare? Do you really want the end of the world?
Give Tammi another dog to train.
Deprive Harvey of coffee.
Things I can and cannot do:
Really? Seriously? I can do damn near anything I decide that I want to do. It might take me a little while, but it'll get done if I want to do it. Ok, I guess there's a few things I cannot do -- like understand how the mind works of today's Democrat or anyone else who refuses to admit facts are true.
Things I say a lot:
Well, there's not much I have to say. I don't use any more words than necessary, and I have little use of repetition to communicate.
People I feel like bugging:
No one. I'm nice like that.
Posted by: Ogre at
03:01 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 293 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You're still here? I thought I devoured you . . .
Posted by: oddybobo at October 17, 2005 04:23 PM (6Gm0j)
2
I love your meme's... I must remember to tag you sometime.
Posted by: vw bug at October 17, 2005 04:48 PM (MNp8q)
3
re: Hillary... I'm so sorry you only have three years left to live

. -
joke
Our Dem minds aren't that beyond comprehensions are they? Fiscal discipline, giving a helping hand for those the market's deficiencies leave by the way side, multilateralism in the world, and practical politics at home. This is what I hope the modern Democratic party will stand for in 08.
Posted by: Graham at October 17, 2005 06:53 PM (1AKh4)
4
You read it wrong, Oddy!
VW...beware of what you ask for!
And Graham, I know, I think Hillary may win. I don't see fiscal discipline in ANY elected politician at ANY level ANYWHERE. I like giving a helping hand, but I despite being forced to give a helping hand -- that's my biggest beef with the liberal point of view. Multilateralism I couldn't care less about; and practical and politics haven't been used in the same sentence honestly in 100 years.
Posted by: Ogre at October 17, 2005 08:21 PM (iJFc9)
5
Ogre, nice? I didn't think that was physically possible! Well, miracles never cease, that or he just ripped one and is trying to mask it with a kind gesture. Luckily, I'm in Tx so it will take some time to reach me!
Posted by: Smokey at October 17, 2005 09:24 PM (68YeG)
6
I know nothing about a large green cloud headed southwest across the southern United States...
Posted by: Ogre at October 17, 2005 09:44 PM (iJFc9)
7
I don't think that Hillary has a shot in hell of winning anything other then another term or two in the senate,certainly nothing more important than that.
Posted by: Jack at October 18, 2005 02:00 PM (aFawc)
8
I, very unfortunately, think she's got at least a 50/50 shot at being president.
Posted by: Ogre at October 18, 2005 02:18 PM (/k+l4)
9
I've noticed that Ogre gets all wobbly when pretty girls tag him with memes.
Not so nice with the guys, though...
Oh well, at least my coffee's safe :-)
Posted by: Harvey at October 18, 2005 04:46 PM (ubhj8)
10
Keep that nasty, smelly, bean-juice away from here!
Posted by: Ogre at October 18, 2005 05:29 PM (iJFc9)
11
I tried...honest to goodness - but ya took this one better than I thought you would! ;-)
I swear Ogre - you put a smile on my face. Yes, that you do!!!!!
Thanks for being such a good sport. Well, sorta.
Posted by: Tammi at October 19, 2005 08:45 PM (8FC2f)
12
You know that's why I exist, Tammi!
Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 05:43 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
97kb generated in CPU 0.0595, elapsed 0.1974 seconds.
101 queries taking 0.1696 seconds, 304 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.