August 31, 2005
Rebuild New Orleans?
I asked the question a few days ago, and now more people are weighing in. The question is, "Should we rebuild New Orleans?"
Left Brain Female says, " folks need to do some deep soul-searching to determine if rebuilding the dream is really worth the cost."
Below the Beltway says "Hell yeah." He also asks, "Where would the 4.5 million people who live there go? What about the businesses that are based there?"
Jack Chambless, Economics Professor of Valencia Community College says, "But the founding fathers never intended, Article One, section Eight of the Constitution, never intended to provide one dollar of taxpayer dollars to pay for any disaster or anything that we might call charity."
Update 8:05PM: Obi-Wan of Forward Biased is unsure at the moment:
4.5 million people, and their hometown may just have disappeared, and this isn't even considering the value of New Orleans as a historic and unique city.
More Updates, 10:00PM EST:
Mark says, "I don't know."
Jeff Jarvis thinks the city "may need to be reinvented."
The Fat Guy says, "I simply canÂ’t imagine an America without New Orleans."
Confederate Yankee says, "Goodbye, Big Easy. It was fun while it lasted."
Martini Republic complains about asking the question, but doesn't give an answer.
Update 5:50AM (Thursday): Porkopolis weighs in with a resounding "no," and an analysis showing why not monetarily. There's also a long list of people and posts discussing alternatives to rebuilding.
Update: 2PM
Right Wing Nuthouse says, "See ya in the French Quarter at Mardi Gras in five yearsÂ…" in giving his support for it's rebuild.
Captain Ed says:
How we take care of New Orleans will say something about our national character and whether it remains as tough and optimistic as our history, for all its flaws, amply demonstrates. Will we walk away from a tough fight? Will America shrug its shoulders and tell the city that we don't want to take on difficult tasks?
...
And so New Orleans must be rebuilt, in some manner, right where it is now.
I, however, don't see it as a "challenge" to "back down" from. I see it as simple economics. WHY? What will happen if we don't rebuild it? Will the hurricanes get mad as us and attack again? I don't think it's a matter of running from a tough fight -- it's just common sense to NOT want to build a city where there's water. Why not just expand Miami Beach 2 miles eastward? That makes about as much sense.
Update Saturday:
Jeff Fisher says,
New Orleans will be rebuilt. The only question is, "Where?"
I'm sure it will be rebuilt. I'm just saying that it's not a good idea to use MY money (taxpayer money) to do it. Let people build whatever they want, wherever they want -- just don't force me to pay for it.
Where are the people to go? Anywhere else. The businesses? The same -- why not start again somewhere else? In TWO months, if the bowl is drained, what are you going to find there? Do you really want to? It would certainly be cheaper to start over somewhere else than to first remove all the debris and THEN start over.
I know we won't, but I think we should just let it be. The billions of dollars spent could be better spent elsewhere -- and of course, the vast majority of those billions will be taxpayer money from my pockets.
If you were given a choice between building a business where you had to clear out flood destruction and ANYWHERE else, which would you choose? I think it's time to move on.
What say you?
Posted by: Ogre at
06:49 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 617 words, total size 5 kb.
1
My thoughts exactly; move on. There's already a constant battle to keep the ocean at bay - instead of spending billions on a coastal project, or risking a move back onto contaminated ground, just go someplace else.
It's not easy to pick up and relocate, but as someone who's done it a few times I can tell you it's not as bad as being hit by a Cat 4 hurricane.
Posted by: pam at August 31, 2005 07:36 PM (l6NIn)
2
I agree. I also feel the same about the wild fires in California, or the mudslides or earthquakes there. It just doesn't make sense to me for people to continue to rebuild on areas that are infamously unstable - and expect someone else, be it insurance or taxpayers - to pay for the constant rebuilding.
If it isn't reasonably safe to build there - don't. If you do, rebuild it yourself, out of YOUR pockets, not America's collective pocket.
Posted by: Erin Monahan at August 31, 2005 07:50 PM (0Ea9a)
3
What did they say 100 years when Galveston was hit? It has never gotten as big as it was, that's for sure. I think the same fate will occur for NO.
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at August 31, 2005 07:54 PM (Sc2Wh)
4
Wow. Thanks for all the comments -- I thought my position would be in the minority, even here!
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 08:02 PM (L0IGK)
5
Ogre, my point wasn't in support of rebuilding, just expressing my thoughts on the issue of not rebuilding. Some folks (e.g. Steel Turman) are not only adamant about this, but seem very matter-of-fact about it, and I confess I can't be quite so detached.
You, and others, make excellent points in favor of not rebuilding, and you're also probably right. That doesn't diminish my regret that New Orleans may have just ceased to exist.
Actually, the second sentence you quoted from me has nothing to do with the "rebuilding" issue, but that I think we should have a permanent registry for people willing to take in disaster victims on a temporary basis. This would save the trouble of scrambling to organize after a disaster (as Bill Hennessy has done, to his credit) as we would be ready for whatever happens next.
If you agree (just on the homes registry thing) I'd appreciate your helping me spread that meme.
And regardless, I appreciate the link muchly! Thanks.
Posted by: Obi-Wan at August 31, 2005 08:22 PM (XB4NN)
6
I understand now, Obi-Wan, and I updated the post to reflect your thoughts (I hope).
And yes, I love the registry and I'll be mentioning that all day tomorrow as tomorrow, at least here, is all-day long hurricane relief blogging!
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 08:35 PM (L0IGK)
7
I posed the same question on my blog today and after reading some things by engineers and others, I'm inclined to say, "No, at least not New Orleans as it was before the disaster hit." By all means, the people should be helped. But to rebuild in an area where disaster is inevitable seems both cavalier about the danger to people and wasteful of money.
Posted by: Mark Daniels at August 31, 2005 09:47 PM (mDSXY)
8
Most certainly, I've not heard ANYONE (even the French) suggest that we abandoned the people and the rescue efforts. But once the people are out, is it really worth it?
And we do need to ask the question now, because massive efforts are already under way to start rebuilding the city.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 09:58 PM (L0IGK)
9
No. And if the same thing happens to Palm Beach County... where *I* live... my answer would be, 'let it return to Everglades'.
Posted by: Bou at August 31, 2005 11:06 PM (5JHEt)
10
I'm starting a blog list of responsible bloggers asking the tough questions regarding the rebuilding of New Orleans at Discussions on alternatives to rebuilding New Orleans.
I've added your post to the list.
Please point any like minded bloggers that would like to be added to the list over my way at:
http://porkopolis.blogspot.com/2005/08/discussions-on-alternatives-to.html
Part of what has to be done is contact Senators and Congressman to let them know there's another way to help those in need.
Porkopolis
Posted by: Porkopolis at August 31, 2005 11:11 PM (mI6CS)
11
I'd really like to see this NOT happen, but I really don't think it will. There are too many in government that cannot even consider the option of leaving it alone. Why am I picturing Sisyphus now?
Posted by: Ogre at September 01, 2005 05:55 AM (L0IGK)
12
Well, I don't think the gov't will forcibly re-build. I think they'll just offer incentives, like tax-exemptions, grants, and low-interest loans.
But I don't think there'll be a lot of interest.
If the population of New Orleans ever rises above 100,000 again, I'd be shocked.
I think the lesson "don't live in a bowl below sea level" has pretty well been learned.
Posted by: Harvey at September 01, 2005 11:12 AM (ubhj8)
13
I think they will rebuild the infrastructure for 500,000 -- that will just be silly. I hope the lesson has been learned!
Posted by: Ogre at September 01, 2005 12:03 PM (/k+l4)
14
Some sort of port facility will have to remain in place. There's too much traffic down the Mississippi that has to be transfered from river-going barge to ocean-going ship. The "not in my back yard" mentality would preclude moving the super tanker port and the refineries. The super tanker thing would require being near the water somehow, somewhere. If not there, where? It would have to be near refineries. Galveston?? Who said 1900 couldn't happen again?
Posted by: David R. Block at September 01, 2005 04:41 PM (HPQz7)
15
I can see a port facility -- but even that can be moved to the new end of the river instead of draining all of New Orleans.
Posted by: Ogre at September 01, 2005 05:35 PM (L0IGK)
16
New Orleans will be rebuilt. The only question is what parts will be built where?
I think that if the whole quaint French Quarter etc. is going to be rebuilt, then it may as well recreate itself on higher ground a ways upstream or across Lake Pontchartrain, and most of the rest of the city can follow. Move the name of the city with it, and later generations will find the move to be a quaint historic fact -- while they continue to flock to the attractions as if they'd always been there. See:
http://jeffryfisher.net/Statesman/Misc/NewOrleans.htm
Posted by: Aspiring Statesman at September 03, 2005 01:26 PM (GIEE0)
17
I have no problem with people building wherever they want to. I just don't want to pay for draining land that's underwater just so people can build there. That just doesn't make sense.
Posted by: Ogre at September 03, 2005 03:17 PM (L0IGK)
18
im with u guys new orleans was a nice city but it doesn't make sence to wast 100 billion dollers to rebuild something that will just get destroyed again. the reason it has never happened befor for thous of you who don't know is the steady rise of polution in the atmosphear. the united stares is the heaviest poluter in the world and bush pulling out of the keyoto accord has only made it worse. the huricanes will only get worse and the death tole will only rise till the burning of fossle fuels is cut back. but all that aside bush is a bourn and raised southerner i think that he will do all that he can to rebuild the city right where it was right down to the last building. then this will all repeat and the econemy will crash and the united states will loose its position as a superpower in the world
Posted by: Unicron at September 23, 2005 01:09 PM (KEJ4O)
19
At last count, Unicron, that total was over $200 billion now! Thanks for stopping by.
Posted by: Ogre at September 23, 2005 01:56 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACLU Complains about FBI Doing their job
I know that tomorrow, Thursday, is the normal day for the
Stop the ACLU blogburst. However, tomorrow is a special day in the land of the internet, so I'm posting my blogburst against the ACLU today.
The ACLU recently released a document that shows that the FBI is actually watching groups that have known or suspected ties to terror -- and the ACLU is outraged.
Now this isn't the FBI using secret wiretaps, hiding in dumpsters, searching through personal or computer records -- this is the FBI DARING to actually show up at publicly announced event that were specifically open to the public, just to see what was going on at them.
You see, the FBI went to various events held by groups that include people who perhaps have goals that are illegal. The FBI only did what any other citizen of this country could do. They did not harass ANYONE at the event. They did not even announce that they were from the FBI. They took no action, arrested no one, and did nothing other than look to see if anyone was doing anything wrong.
And the ACLU cannot stand it.
The FBI attended meetings of the Michigan Militia, Aryan Nation, a "5%" group (radical splinter muslim group), various ELF-associated animal liberation radical front groups, and, the one the ACLU is going bananas over, a "peace" group called "By Any Means."
Apparently, according to the ACLU, it is OK to watch those wackos in the Michigan Militia -- who have not committed any crime -- but it is NOT OK to watch a group of people who specifically, in the NAME of their group, suggest they will kill and destroy as many people as they can to reach their goal.
So, if you support the ACLU, you support groups that will kill you and anyone else who gets in their way of supporting "peace," but you do not support groups that want to defend their own land in an orderly, legal manner.
This IS the ACLU today.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:05 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 352 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Those damn gestapo FBI people! Imagine actually trying to protect Americans against terrorist and other illegal activities! I say they're the ones that should be arrested. I hope the ACLU is going to do something about this travesty of justice.
Posted by: Mustang at August 31, 2005 06:26 PM (KT31O)
2
The ACLU has a tough time with this one because they normally work to expand federal powers, but sometimes their expansions work against them.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 06:56 PM (L0IGK)
3
I read some comments from a speech that John Howard gave the other day - how immigrants who come to Australia need to become australian, and that if they were going to celebrate their own culture they should stay where they are, and that they were gonna be watching the crazies very carefully...
Could you imagine what the ACLU would do if GW said stuff like that?!?!?!?
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at August 31, 2005 07:59 PM (Sc2Wh)
4
I remember reading that article, too, it was awesome! I think if GW said that, many in the ACLU would simply have heart attacks and move to France.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 08:08 PM (L0IGK)
Posted by: Jay at September 01, 2005 11:56 AM (2FcUc)
6
Great commentary. One thing, probably just fingers moving too fast (I do it myself),
"The FBI did nothing that any other citizen of this country could do."
Ought to be
" The FBI did nothing that any other citizen of this country could NOT do." or perhaps
" The FBI did ONLY WHAT any other citizen of this country could do."
Yeh, Mother was an English teacher...
Posted by: David at September 01, 2005 03:42 PM (ACL5/)
7
Good catch! I had to read that twice to see what was wrong with it. Thanks.
(And anyone else who reads this, it's been fixed so these two comments may not make sense now...)
Posted by: Ogre at September 01, 2005 03:45 PM (/k+l4)
8
Great post.
God, I hate the ACLU...
Posted by: jimmyb at September 02, 2005 09:10 PM (591UF)
9
They seem to do worse and worse these days.
Posted by: Ogre at September 03, 2005 02:57 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Human Zoo Exhibit
I had
previously mentioned the morons in London who have created a
zoo exhibit including people, instead of animals. This isn't the first time, and I bet it won't be the last, because so many people are plain idiots.
This week, the Christian Views Symposium (found over at Cross Blogging) asks some questions about that "exhibit."
Feel free to join in and provide your own answers to the questions over at the original post, or make your own post and link back to the original. You don't have to be a Christian to play (and answer), anyone can join in! The questions this week:
Is man a plague species?
Is man just another primate?
Is man superior to other animals?
What do you believe mansÂ’ relationship to animals is or should be?
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
01:01 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 552 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Leave it to the Brits to come up with something new. Actually, I thought it might be fun to watch them if they wore nothing, like the animals and engaged in primitive courtship rituals like cavemen or something like that. That would be a reason to visit the zoo. I would certainly go to the zoo to see that exhibit.
Posted by: Skarr at August 31, 2005 04:42 PM (zlGZF)
2
Thanks for stopping by, Skarr -- I'm actually kind of surprised that they DIDN'T do that with this exhibit. Maybe they're waiting to see how popular this "attraction" is.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 04:53 PM (L0IGK)
3
That reached your news? It was only a little column here, if that. The "silly" news, if you will. I'm surprised it was picked up at all :-D
Posted by: Sally at August 31, 2005 06:41 PM (T/9Zp)
4
Well, it wasn't headline news, but it did make the front page of various news web sites. Silly is an understatement. I don't like it because they are being intentionally dishonest about things.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 06:58 PM (L0IGK)
5
Hey! We have one of those! It's called San Francisco!!
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at August 31, 2005 07:56 PM (Sc2Wh)
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 08:07 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Left Supports What?
If you watch and listen to leftists in this country, the continue to claim that they support the troops, but not the war. National Review
shows us how much they support the troops. Comments directed towards actual military heroes:
YouÂ’re a disgusting human being, and I hope you rot in hell!
If you think the war is okay, then why donÂ’t you go and serve!
Head over and read the whole article (it's short) to see how much the left really supports our troops. In case you don't get it (or don't want to read it), I'll help you out: They don't.
(Hat tip to Social Sense).
Posted by: Ogre at
09:04 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 115 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Alot of mouth & emotion, but no brains. Thank goodness they're not winning any elections.
Posted by: cube at August 31, 2005 12:24 PM (/qYdM)
2
Unfortunately, they are winning here in North Carolina, thanks to gerrymandering and tyranny.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 12:57 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CA officially selects a religion
Christians are now persona non gratis in the University of California school system. The state of California is now officially, according to the University system, a state sponsor of the naturalist religion and no other religions will be tolerated or allowed in the University system.
In related news, the United States Air Force agrees to punish Christians as well.
The University system is now rejecting any course that has been taught by any private, home, or religious school that contains any reference to creationism or intelligent design; or even any that actually mention that FACT that Darwin's theory of evolution is actually a theory.
They are also rejecting any history course that mentions Christians, including a course called "ChristianityÂ’s Influence on American History," even if the courses are actually based on facts. Since the course NAME contains the word "Christian," it is verboten in the California University system.
This is what happens when the government gets too involved in the education system. The STATE has no business, indeed NO need, even no real reason to be in the business of education. The state does not need state schools. The entire state university system should be scrapped -- private institutions will very quickly and easily take their place.
Unfortunately, there are too many with vested interests in the state-run education system for reason to enter into the system. Watch this case closely, as it will likely reach the Supreme Court (after getting through the morons on the 9th circuit court), and could have a very far-reaching impact on ALL education and religion in this country.
(Hat tip to Cross Blogging).
Posted by: Ogre at
07:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I expect to see the ACLU jumping all over this any time now!!!
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at August 31, 2005 08:02 PM (Sc2Wh)
2
Sure, sure. That's the ACLU, standing up for religious liberty everywhere, right? Hello? ACLU?
*chirp, chirp*
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 08:09 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
No Fishing
The North Carolina Legislature will simply not adjourn. The longer they are in session, the more of YOUR money will be taken from you. Their latest move
requires a fishing license for fishing in the ocean. Why? The same reason the Democrat-controlled North Carolina Legislature does 95% of what they do -- to take more money from working people to give to the people THEY like.
In addition, it used to be that you could fish in your own county without a license, since you lived there. This new law that requires licenses for salt-water fishing also abolishes the old rule that allows that -- now if you fish in a pond in your backyard, you better have a fishing license. Of course, that government "enforcer" will have a hard time not getting shot for trespassing on MY property...
The new law is expected to raise $18 million. And who gets to spend it? Not ANY elected official, but "the Marine Fisheries Commission." In other words, unelected bureaucrats gets to spend MORE money with absolutely ZERO accountability. This IS your Democrat-controlled legislature in action.
Posted by: Ogre at
05:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 188 words, total size 1 kb.
1
How far does NC's boarder extend out into the Ocean?
Because how can you tax a place that isn't in your jurisdiction?
Posted by: Machelle at August 31, 2005 11:13 AM (ZAyoW)
2
200 miles.
Seriously.
According to those with power to jail you for fishing, "The determining factor is where the fish is landed, not where it's caught."
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 11:55 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 30, 2005
Dirty, FILTHY NC Legislature
North Carolina now has a lottery.
You may remember that I mentioned a week ago that there was a BIPARTISAN group of Senators opposed to the lottery, and the current balance of power in the Senate was 26 opposed to the lottery, 24 supporting it. Of the 26 opposed, 21 were Republicans and 5 were Democrats. All 24 supporters were Democrats.
Earlier this week, the Senate "leader" declared that the lottery was "dead" until next year, as he couldn't change anyone's vote. Today the Senate decided to meet and vote. NO VOTES CHANGED. The final vote was 24-24. The Lieutenant Governor (D) cast the tiebreaker, making the vote 25-24.
The Charlotte Observer Story describes how it happened, but not quite accurately.
After the Senate was done with all their business last week, allegedly for the year, Senator John Garwood, (R-Wilkes) was injured and was at home recovering from an infection. Senator Harry Brown (R-Onslow) left for his "Honeymoon." Then the Democrats forced an unconstitutional vote to cram the lottery down the throats of North Carolina voters. Of course the Constitution long-ceased to matter to Democrats in this state.
There are no details on how Senator Garwood was injured. There was also no word on how Senator Brown was funding his honeymoon. It certainly seems to me to be much more than a coincidence that the only two senators missing from the Senate when a vote "suddenly" appeared were two Republicans who opposed the lottery.
The North Carolina Democrat Legislature is dirtier than New Orleans right now.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:44 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 264 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Great regional post. We need more regional information concerning the foul politcs.
Thanks
Posted by: Brian at August 30, 2005 11:06 PM (4Oi0c)
2
Too bad the evil dems corrupted another state.
From Massively Corrupt Illinois, it's gettin' really bad here!
Posted by: OTTMANN at August 31, 2005 12:21 AM (6COgO)
3
Just bloghopping... have a nice day

BA~~261
Posted by: WiLL Garcia at August 31, 2005 01:56 AM (tYPcB)
4
Thanks, Brian, but I'm not sure you really want more information on this group of people.
Ottman, I watch IL, and I often wonder which state is more corrupt. They are both the worst I've seen.
Thanks for stopping by, Will!
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 05:55 AM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Katrina Updates
Wow.
This one is much worse than I imagined. Sure, I'd read all the stories about the "bowl" of New Orleans, but you never really believe it can happen. This is really, really bad. I'm starting to think it's time to cut our losses and just abandon New Orleans to the ocean.
For good updates, see Michelle Malkin. An up to the minute update blog can be found at a local TV station. Updated continuously. Hugh Hewitt is suggesting a coordinated blogger fund-raising effort for this one. Glennn Reynolds suggests Thursday.
But seriously -- one of the major levees has broken and the city continues to flood. One thing I don't see mentioned much is that the storm is still dropping rain UPRIVER. More and more water is destined to head into the area. The water can only get deeper because the pumps have no power to pump.
It is time to give up? I don't mean to stop helping the people, I'm just wondering if this is when we should get the people out and just leave the land there underwater. It is below sea level. Would the cost of draining and attempting to restore that area, certainly to be in excess of $30 billion, actually be worth it?
Posted by: Ogre at
03:45 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I saw some heartbreaking stories this morning on the news.
The coverage of the looters was most sickening. Some people are no better than rats. In a time like this, that is the priority. Let's see what we can steal. Unreal, lock and load.
Posted by: Tomslick at August 30, 2005 04:10 PM (xNjHI)
2
It's really pretty bad. If you follow some of those links, you'll see lots of information that you likely didn't want to know.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 04:47 PM (L0IGK)
3
I have these same thoughts. There is much emotional attachment to that city... but really... it is ludicrous to save it. Logically, it just does not make sense. But, it isn't about that. They will save it. And this will happen again. I keep thinking of Atlantis.
Posted by: Bou at August 30, 2005 09:25 PM (5JHEt)
4
The latest news has the levee continuing to break and the city continuing to flood even more. And the waters just keep rising. I think it's just time to allow the Gulf to reclaim the below sea-level land.
Think about it -- what will be left there if the place is covered with 20 feet of water for a month, then it's drained?
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 09:39 PM (L0IGK)
5
Has anyone heard of any international help pledged thus far?
Posted by: Tomslick at August 31, 2005 10:00 AM (xNjHI)
6
I think I heard a rumor that Japan was going to give us 1 barrel of oil. The French offered to surrender for us.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 10:49 AM (/k+l4)
7
I kinda think as you do here - it's certainly gonna be a long haul to clean up and rebuild - take a look at my post
here:
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at August 31, 2005 06:23 PM (6krEN)
8
Good points. I don't think it's going to be worth it.
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 06:30 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HomeSpun Symposium RIP
Well, I think it's finally time to declare the Homespun Symposium from
The Homespun Bloggers dead. The last time an actual Homespun Symposium question was posted was... well... so long ago that it doesn't show up on the main page any more.
There it is, August 8th. Six responses from over, well, a lot of bloggers. That's not too bad, but these things can't go on forever. Hey, they're still putting out Homespun Radio, so that's pretty cool.
But for now, at least, I'll give up on the answering of weekly Homespun Symposium questions. If anyone sees them start back up, let me know, as they were almost always a lot of fun!
Posted by: Ogre at
01:03 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
Subscriptions for Soldiers
One of the Google Ads led to a site called
Subscriptions for Soldiers. This is a site that
gives you a chance to personally show the hardworking men and women in AmericaÂ’s armed forces how much you truly appreciate their sacrifice. For only $10 you can send a gift subscription to active servicemen and women serving around the world right now.
That sounds pretty good!
Has anyone else heard anything about this site or the group promoting it (PriMedia)? I'd love to hear someone that knows this group is on the up and up before promoting them and sending them some of my cash...
Posted by: Ogre at
11:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I have to agree with your suspicions. Some people will expoit anything for a buck. Keep us posted if this is above board.
Posted by: Tomslick at August 30, 2005 04:13 PM (xNjHI)
2
I've not found anything yet to either support or oppose this yet. I will post again if I can find something one way or the other.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 04:48 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Man's Man
It's been a little while since I've seen some quizzes making the rounds. But
Phin provided me a link to a nice quiz:
John Wayne You scored 50% Tough, 4% Roguish, 19% Friendly, and 28% Charming! |
You, my friend, are a man's man, the original true grit, one tough
talking, swaggering son of a bitch. You're not a bad guy, on the
contrary, you're the ultimate good guy, but you're one tough character,
rough and tumble, ready for anything. You call the shots and go your
own way, and if some screwy dame is willing to accept your terms,
that's just fine by you. Otherwise, you'll just hit the open trail and
stay true to yourself. You stand up for what you believe and can handle
any situation, usually by rushing into the thick of the action. You're
not polished and you're not overly warm, but you're a straight shooter
and a real stand up guy. Co-stars include Lauren Bacall and Maureen
O'Hara, tough broads who can take care of themselves.
Find out what kind of classic dame you'd make by taking the
Classic Dames Test. |
|
My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: | You scored higher than 92% on Tough | | You scored higher than 5% on Roguish | | You scored higher than 21% on Friendly | | You scored higher than 45% on Charming |
|
Posted by: Ogre at
09:04 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: oddybobo at August 30, 2005 11:11 AM (6Gm0j)
2
Was there ever any doubt?
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 11:57 AM (/k+l4)
3
I'm afraid to take this because I'd probably get Wally Cox.
(you know, the guy who did the voice for Underdog)
Posted by: Harvey at August 30, 2005 05:26 PM (ubhj8)
4
Either that or you'd end up with Napoleon Dynamite.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 07:59 PM (L0IGK)
5
This so does not surprise me... ;-) I'm not seeing John Wayne in a Mini, however!!!
Posted by: Bou at August 30, 2005 09:27 PM (5JHEt)
6
Well... well... they didn't have Minis in the Old West.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 09:39 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Zoo Idiots
Idiots.
8 complete and total morons from England have decided that they are equivalent to animals and are participating in a zoo exhibit -- 5 women and 3 men. The zoo claims that "the human is just another primate." Total foolishness and absolute ignorance of reality.
Stupid moronic idiot Tom Mahoney said, ""A lot of people think humans are above other animals. When they see humans as animals, here, it kind of reminds us that we're not that special."
Hey, dumb ass Tom, WE ARE! You stupid fool, we ARE superior to animals! YOU might not be, but humans in general ARE NOT animals. Anyone who thinks humans are the same as animals is a complete and total ass.
Many of these morons believe in natural selection -- if that's the case, then how are humans NOT superior? Their own theories refute their own theories! These people are idiots. I don't understand why they even get any news coverage. My theory is that they are so stupid and SO far removed from reality, that they are actually newsworthy.
No matter what, they are 100% idiots and fools.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:02 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I believe in natural selection . . .
I believe it is natural for me to select morons to shoot and let god sort em out.
Oh, yes, i also think that some humans are not superior to animals, at least not my dog or cat. . . or your llamas. Some humans (not naming any names *ahem-moonbats-ahem*) are not even superior to invertebrates! So there! *sticking out my tongue like a juvenile moonbat and running away*
Posted by: Oddybobo at August 30, 2005 09:40 AM (6Gm0j)
2
The articles don't mention if the exhibit people were selected for their level of insanity and moonbattedness, but I guess that IS implied, isn't it?
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 09:56 AM (/k+l4)
3
Never underestimate the pwoer of human stupidity ... /TJ
Posted by: TJ at August 30, 2005 12:31 PM (N4b26)
4
Now if we could only harness it as an energy source...
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 12:47 PM (/k+l4)
5
I saw this in our paper. Did you see the whacked out pix? I wanted to say, "But be true to the animal kingdom. We need to see them procreate..."

I guess we're only the same to a certain degree. Heh.
Posted by: Bou at August 30, 2005 09:30 PM (5JHEt)
6
I'm glad I didn't see pictures. Morons. If they like "survival of the fittest" so much, I've got a shotgun and they don't. Does that give me the "natural right" to shoot them?
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 09:41 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Democrats Attack Libertarians
The Democrats, through one of their various enforcer-arms (the Board of Elections), has made an attempt to
destroy the Libertarian Party in North Carolina. Why? Because they don't like competition.
The Board of Elections has removed the ability of people to register with the party of their choice by decertifying the Libertarian Party in North Carolina. Another blogger, Rusty Sheridan is now not allowed to run for Charlotte Mayor, even after already registering. He is still trying, however.
Why would the Democrats in North Carolina do this? Instead, I believe the ballot access ought to be MORE open, not less. Currently North Carolina requires 70,000 people to sign a petition to have a party "certified." That's not right -- what if an entire town, 20,000 people, want to form their own political party. In North Carolina, they cannot. That's wrong.
Then again, the Democrats in North Carolina rule the state with an iron fist -- they don't like any competition in any way, shape or form. Do you still support Democrats?
(Linked to Stop the ACLU Trackback Party).
Posted by: Ogre at
05:00 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is typical of the democratic branch. It will however only make people like them less them less in my opinion. The people's voice should never be silenced. What a shame the democrats can't see past their quest for power.
Posted by: Jay at August 30, 2005 07:29 AM (BKqRl)
2
"Democratic Branch."
Perhaps unintentionally well-said -- they do believe they are their own branch of government (at least in North Carolina), and their branch is superior to all other branches (and the Constitution).
Unfortunately, it seems that most people who vote for Democrats don't really care or pay attention, so things like this will not even be noticed by them. Hopefully I reach 1 voter each month with this information, but my estimates might be a bit high.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 07:41 AM (/k+l4)
3
I don't understand why the Dems would do that; because Libertarians usually siphon votes from Republicans. Most Republican strategists LOVE the Green Party; because "Green" actually means "Get Republicans Elected Every November"
Posted by: Justin Thibault at August 30, 2005 10:09 AM (FWvKf)
4
Justin, my guess is that they don't want to take ANY chances. In some areas of North Carolina (very many, actually), there are Democrats with no Republican challenger. If they allow Libertarians to participate, they will have competition.
Also, there are large numbers of smaller governments in North Carolina (local governments) where a couple hundred votes is all you need to win. If a libertarian or two wins there, they could continue their rise -- which the Democrats do NOT want.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 10:44 AM (/k+l4)
5
*whispering*
"New Hampshire"
Posted by: Harvey at August 30, 2005 05:27 PM (ubhj8)
6
You have NO idea how hard I'm trying.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 08:00 PM (L0IGK)
7
It could be worse, it could be Republicans
Posted by: Ranting Tommy at August 30, 2005 08:09 PM (EIpgJ)
8
Republicans did actually fight this one, amazingly enough.
Posted by: Ogre at August 30, 2005 08:59 PM (L0IGK)
9
I don't think it's all the Democrats' fault. Republicans, in my experience, have not taken too kindly to Libertarian competition either.
Posted by: Rusty Sheridan at September 15, 2005 10:36 AM (GNtK0)
10
In this case, however, it is a Democrat-led group that's doing it. In many cases the minority Republicans are voting agains the Democrats here.
Posted by: Ogre at September 15, 2005 10:59 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 29, 2005
Open Borders?
Lou Dobbs had it right on the money when he said, "We are a nation of immigrants, and there is no more diverse and welcoming society than ours. But we are first a nation of laws, and upholding those laws and our national values makes this great country of ours possible."
What happens if we do not uphold those laws? Dobbs goes on.
Failure to secure our borders means that we will continue to lose the war on drugs and lose a generation of Americans to those drugs. It also means the crushing burden of our failed immigration and homeland security policies will continue to fall exclusively on the shoulders of working men and women. Not only do illegal aliens and those who employ them cost the nation tens of billions of dollars in social services, principally in health care and education, they also depress wages for American citizens by an estimated $200 billion a year.
[Note: The following was written by Mustang, a retired Marine officer who blogs at Social Sense. This is reprinted in full with his gracious permission, and we'll be featuring more of his work next week.]
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
02:57 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 922 words, total size 6 kb.
War Stories
Do you know any firsthand stories from the war in Iraq? Dawn Miller is looking for stories from Iraq. She says:
I'm looking for true stories of faith, miracles love and compassion in the midst of war from our soldiers in Iraq. If anyone has a story to share, they can email me at walkbyj@aol.com. Remind them to put "Somebody's Been Praying For Me" in the subject heading and to list their contact info. I will review the stories and contact them in the order they're received.
Thanks and God Bless!
Dawn Miller
She's a published author/screenwriter looking for information. Her bio is in the extended entry.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
01:30 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 282 words, total size 2 kb.
New Blog Carnival Showcase

Here is it! The New Blog Showcase Carnival! This is the showcase carnival that showcases new blogs. Any blog that's less than 3 months old is eligible. This is the carnival that highlights those new blogs. This week we've got a whopping ONE entry.
While you're browsing blogs, be sure to either submit those new blogs, or tell the owner of the blog to submit. This is the chance to get some exposure for those brand-new blogs. In recent weeks, the submissions have been very weak. We may have to change the format, suggestions are welcome.
In addition, this is supposed to be a traveling carnival. However, the carnival seems to have parked itself here at Ogre's Views. That's okay with me, but you are missing a chance at free links and experience hosting a carnival! If you want to host, please send me an email (link in the upper right corner over there). It's REAL simple if you want to host.
Without further ado, our ONE entry into the carnival for this week:
Now this one is one that's going to get on my blogroll right away. It's a blog dedicated to "Cabarrus County, NC local news and politics" -- that's the county over from me, so I am very interested. Cabarrus county seems to be getting the same disease Mecklenburg County has -- and it's spreading to various other counties -- the disease is socialism.
As a submitted post, he submits Politics in an Odd-Numbered Year X: Odell Stops that Big, Yellow Taxi and Skips on the Fare. That post is a long, detailed post describing annexation rights. Even if you're not in the area, you should go read, as I bet this same thing is happening in your area.
Folks, this IS the New Blog Carnival Showcase. Go ahead, head on over to that blog and comment. Don't you remember when you started out and appreciated that comment? Make people like the New Blog Carnival Showcase so we can keep this thing going!
This post included in NZ Bear's Uber Carnivals post.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
Favorite Quote
Richard Combs, of
Combs Spouts Off, is
asking for favorite quotes. I'll provide two.
I regret that I have but one life to give for my country.
Sometimes worded as "one life to lose." Either way, it's one of my all-time favorites.
Also:
It's a 106 miles to Chicago. We got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.
Feel free to name the speakers in the comments.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:30 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm a geek aren't I? I know the top one from school. Nathan Hale. The 2nd one... no clue. Obviously a pop culture reference that I didn't get while living under my rock reading history...
Posted by: Bou at August 29, 2005 12:47 PM (5JHEt)
2
Sounds like the Blues Brothers.
One of my all time favs is
Promise her anything, but give her Pez.
Posted by: tomslick at August 29, 2005 01:53 PM (xNjHI)
3
You're right on both counts, Bou -- and Tomslick hit it with the second one. Bou, you should watch the Blues Brothers more often. And not that edited crap on broadcast TV, either.
Posted by: Ogre at August 29, 2005 02:09 PM (L0IGK)
4
Elwood Blues, specifically :-)
Anyway, one of my faves, and something I consistantly preach to people thinking about starting a blog:
"Start where you stand, and work with whatever tools you may have at your command, and better tools will be found as you go along"--Napoleon Hill
Phrased more poetically in Andrew Carnegie's favorite version:
"The gods send thread for a web begun."
Posted by: Harvey at August 29, 2005 05:38 PM (ubhj8)
5
And don't forget the follow up line from Jake: "Hit It."
Posted by: Ogre at August 29, 2005 07:19 PM (L0IGK)
6
Heck, if you're going to allow Blues Brothers quotes, how about:
Jake: First you trade the Cadillac for a microphone. Then you lie to me about the band. Now you're gonna put me right back in the joint.
Elwood: They're not gonna catch us. We're on a mission from God.
Posted by: Richard G. Combs at August 31, 2005 12:07 AM (rCfWT)
7
"You traded the Cadillac for this?"
"No, for a microphone."
"Oh, that's different."
Posted by: Ogre at August 31, 2005 05:58 AM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hurricane Prayers
Wow.
I was in Florida during Hurricane Andrew (another Category 5 hurricane), and I saw the massive damage that was done. I cannot image what's happening in Louisiana. Please take a moment now to say a prayer for those who are in the path of this absolutely devastating storm. I will likely feel some from the storm, but I'm so far inland it will likely only be a heavy rain -- nothing like the southern end of the state of LA.
Wow.
Hear more at Boudicca's Voice -- she's in Florida and knows these storms up close.
Posted by: Ogre at
09:01 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am sick for those folks throughout SE La and MS. What a frickin' mess. I guess there are flash flood warnings now throughout the New Orleans area.
Man, Ogre, I'm dreading this September. I got hit with two last year, dodged two this year, my folks have been hit twice and if you include Katrina's outter bands, 3X in the last 11 months... I'm done. I really think Montana is starting to look really really really good...
Posted by: Bou at August 29, 2005 12:50 PM (5JHEt)
2
I've actually looked at the entire country from a geologist's point of view. There's nowhere safe. Everywhere has it's natural disasters. West coast has earthquakes, south and southeast have hurricanes, north and northeast get snow storms, and the Midwest has it's twisters.
I'm in one of the most relatively safe places -- far enough inland to be mostly safe from hurricanes, too far south for real snow storms, and in just the right spot for very, very few tornadoes -- and that's despite being on top of a fault line that could erupt into earthquakes any time.
Of course, that's about all the good reasons you can really give to move to North Carolina...the bad reasons really start to add up when you consider taxes, education, and crime...
Posted by: Ogre at August 29, 2005 02:13 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
96kb generated in CPU 0.0279, elapsed 0.1704 seconds.
100 queries taking 0.1531 seconds, 310 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.