October 12, 2005
Feds to Raise Taxes
Soon we shall see if this President Bush will follow in his father's footsteps and agree to raise taxes. His "tax advisory panel" is
discussing which taxes to raise, and how much to raise them.
Democrat Vice Chairman John Breaux says:
We have a concept. We know where to go. We just don't have the details.
And that concept is to raise taxes.
Oh sure, they're not selling it as a tax increase. And sure, they're going with the old standby of class warfare (it only affects the rich) -- but any time the government takes more of my money, that's a tax increase, no matter what anyone else wants to call it.
Connie Mack, alleged Republican, sent mixed messages by claiming to not want a value-added tax and yet asking staff to create a proposal that includes a value-added tax.
If you see a value-added tax, RUN! Value-added tax is the most insidious tax there can be because consumers will not see the tax -- government will get increased income, prices will rise, but consumers will think businesses are raising prices for profit.
Damn, whatever happened to the Fair Tax? Unfortunately, this "panel" will not consider good ideas like that one: They rejected a fundamental overhaul of the tax code, clearly claiming that they like the current tax system.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 1 kb.
Charlotte City Council Continues Anti-Freedom
So, in case you're wondering what's being considered by the Charlotte city government, here's the two "big items" from Monday night's council meeting:
1. Punish people who obey the law and attempt to reduce crime.
2. Fine people who buy alarm systems for their homes.
Could the council actually do any more to support criminals? Seriously! This city council is honestly doing all they can to increase the already high crime rate in Charlotte. But of course, they simply refuse to admit there are actually any crimes committed in Charlotte.
For issue #1, the council considered banning handguns in the city, except for those who seek and receive approval from the Sheriff. The police chief sees a need to "deal with firearms." I think perhaps he's feeling threatened, and perhaps he should feel that way. I wonder if revolt can be too far away in Charlotte (although I fear it's very far away).
Democrat Warren Turner was honestly worried that people in Charlotte might find out that they can carry guns because the issue was being discussed. I couldn't make up crap that good. The councilman is actually scared that people might discover they have rights. Can someone send this moron to Cuba, please? Hey Mr. Turner, I've got rights and YOU can't have them!
On issue #2, the city wants to add a tax to be charged to anyone who dares to install an alarm system in their home. No, this is not a tax or fine for false alarms, this is a simple tax on you for DARING to install an alarm, since as the almighty council knows, there's no crime in Charlotte and you don't need an alarm.
The results of both issues? Postponed all voting until after the November 8 election where all seats are up for election. What a shocker.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.
October 11, 2005
Bush attacks South America
*** BREAKING NEWS ***
Dateline: Lima, Peru.
U.S. President, warmonger, and unilateralist George Bush used his weather machine this week to begin draining the Amazon River. The 4,075-mile long river's water flow has been drastically reduced to less than 424,000 cubic feet per second by Bush's war machine.
The Amazon River flows through the countries of Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, Venezuela, and Brazil. The lower river levels are causing problems with transport and economics on the river, which is the main form of transportation in these countries.
Researcher Jean-Louis LeFrenchie postulates that Haliburton is about to go into production with a low-water-level boat that can be used to transport goods in water that is very shallow and Haliburton is already in negotiation with the various tribes of the region to start selling them these boats. Negotiations were weak until the river level started dropping.
The Brazilian government's National Institute of Meteorology said dry weather in the Amazon is linked to warmer Pacific Ocean surface temperatures, which changes rainfall patterns, which may actually be the real reason that the water levels are dropping.
Also of note is the fact that while the river's level is the lowest "on record," there are only 36 years of records that have been kept.
*** END BREAKING NEWS ***
So, how am I doing? Is this FMSM journalism material, or what?
Posted by: Ogre at
05:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Not to worry. I understand Bush will be awarding a multi-billion-dollar no-bid contract to Haliburton so that they can fix the climate. They have the whole story over at the Huffington Post, they're just holding it back for the proper time.
Posted by: Ferdinand T. Cat at October 12, 2005 02:58 AM (BDDic)
2
But then all the climate problems will go away -- and everyone knows that Bush and Republicans only MAKE problems, not solve them...
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 06:54 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Carnival of Liberty
It's up at
Combs Spouts Off. This is my current absolute favorite of all carnivals because it highlights freedom and liberty from all over the blogosphere. If you only read one carnival a week, this is the one you really should be reading if you like freedom (and not just because I finally remembered to enter).
Carnival of Liberty #15
Posted by: Ogre at
02:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
HomeSpun Blogger Symposium
Time again for the weekly feature of the Homespun Blogger Symposium... Oops. It seems
Major Dad 1984 didn't have time to post a symposium this week. That's okay, as we'll just make up our own, based on his writings.
He's got a pretty good excuse, if you ask me. Something about catching the Asian Bird Flu or something, I wasn't really paying attention...
I think he recovered nicely as he went for BBQ soon thereafter (and yes, I am jealous).
So, in honor of MajorDad1984's sickness, today's Homespun Symposium will be about sickness! (And there was much rejoicing):
What was the worst sickness/illness/disease YOU ever contracted?
Posted by: Ogre at
11:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Flu & chicken pox (but not at the same time). Let's hope the H5N1 avian flu doesn't mutate into a human vector because that could be worse.
Posted by: cube at October 11, 2005 01:49 PM (9NjQ4)
2
The flu can be pretty bad, but yes, that avian flu will be beyond comprehension.
Thanks for stopping by!
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 02:03 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
1,000,000 PEOPLE DEAD!
Well, did that make you read this post? I'm just in training to be a member of the FMSM (Formerly Mainstream Media). I'm noticing more and more that to "report" in the media, you must do quite literally anything to get people to read the articles, even if it means being totally misleading or lying.
For example, take this headline from the Fox News website:
Records Show Miers Owned Gun Without License
Now, what is your first reaction to reading that headline? What do you think that story will be about? I'm sorry, whatever you were thinking, you're wrong.
Clearly, the author of the headline is implying that Miers owned a gun illegally, by having a gun without a license. However, it is not until the 4th paragraph of the story that the author finally admits that there is actually no such thing as a license to own a gun!
The entire first portion of the article is clearly slanted towards making Miers sound like a bad person because she owned a gun, but didn't have a concealed carry permit (which Texas allows because Texas is evil).
Then, after the article finally admits that there is absolutely nothing wrong with owning a gun without a license that doesn't even exist, it wanders on and talks about personal correspondence between Bush and Miers when she was chairman of the Texas Lottery Commission.
Sometimes I don't know why I even bother reading any news reports -- I might as well be reading the tabloids. Then again, I guess that's why blogs are so powerful today -- it's the only media that might actually tell the truth.
UPDATE: The wonders of the web -- the story headline has been modifed. I've got a screen shot of the original, however:
Posted by: Ogre at
08:04 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That is called Creative Writing...they have classes for that.
Posted by: Michael at October 11, 2005 10:49 AM (JUnMB)
2
I dunno about that -- looks a little too intentional for that...but then again, don't you think in the creative writing classes they TELL these people who want to be reporters that they're not supposed to make up news?
Never mind, the course is most likely: Creative Writing 211: Making up News for Profit.
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 10:56 AM (/k+l4)
3
Next, they'll be saying she is a thesbian.
Posted by: Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 12:23 PM (090nn)
4
Yep, this is Journalism 101:
When Journalistic Integrity Meets With Political Agenda, Truth Gets Lost in Translation (title of an
article I wrote last year for ChronWatch). I thought the title was catchy - but more and more I believe it's truth.
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 11, 2005 12:38 PM (ywZa8)
5
And an UNREGISTERED Thesbian, Soldier's Dad! Thanks for stopping along.
I wonder if it's a two-week course, or an entire Semester, LeftBrainFemail.
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 12:57 PM (/k+l4)
6
Interesting. I own a gun, but do not possess any licenses or permits. As long as I don't carry it in public, I am not breaking any laws.
I am, however, evil according to the FMSM.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 12, 2005 10:37 AM (K+h36)
7
Yes, you are evil.
And it's interesting living near a state border. When I used to drive from NC to SC for work, I refused to (and still do) get permission to arm myself. In NC I could ONLY carry the gun in public -- to carry it hidden was a crime. But then when I drove over the border, I would have to hide the weapon, because carrying it in plain sight was a crime, while carrying it hidden was fine.
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 10:58 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Workers Compensation for Millionaires
Nice. The minimum salary for a player in the NFL is $230,000.00. That's for rookies. The average number of years of experience for a player in the NFL is 5 years. The minimum salary for a player with 5 years of experience is $540,000. Now, which of you would say that these players need cash government help?
If you think these people do not need government cash, you are not qualified to be a judge in North or South Carolina. You see, numerous judges in those states think that the state worker compensation funds should be used to pay those players who are injured.
Yes, that's correct -- the judges are ruling that just because someone signs a contract for employment as a professional football player, they do not give up "their rights to worker compensation."
I'm sorry, I missed that right. Tell me again how and why someone is entitled to money simply because they were injured? Rolf Blizzard says it best:
"Is that what workers' comp was intended to do?" he asked. "It really is a fundamental question of what you think workers' comp should be."
Gee, is there anyone else besides myself that isn't simply entitled to government cash? Am I the ONLY person working to support everyone else?
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nope, I worked for years to support everyone as well.
Posted by: vw bug at October 11, 2005 08:02 AM (mD8Rg)
2
Thank goodness I'm not the only one!
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 08:21 AM (/k+l4)
3
I have worked since I was 16 and never once have I asked nor taken any type of assistance from the government.
Then again, I also don't think there would be a situation harsh enough for me to ask for assistance. I've always been one of those proud/self provider people.
Posted by: Contagion at October 11, 2005 08:59 AM (Q5WxB)
4
O.K., that's three of us that are actually working for what they earn...
(And I'm with you, Contagion, I don't WANT government help).
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 10:00 AM (/k+l4)
5
You see, Ogre, if they didn't provide worker's comp to football players, they'd face charges of discrimination. It's typical Liberalism eating itself alive.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 12, 2005 10:40 AM (K+h36)
6
And that's their exact argument -- it wouldn't be fair to not give the millionaires their share of tax money.
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 10:58 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 10, 2005
Words Mean Things
Want to know more about the enemy in the war on terror? Go read
this post. It will let you know a little more about how the terrorists think.
Posted by: Ogre at
09:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
Carnival, carnival!
Time for more carnival links on this wonderful (rainy) Columbus Day.
First up, the wonderful and always exciting Tarheel Tavern. This week the host is Nothing Could Be Finer and he posts the 33rd Carnival with the "special days" theme quite well.
The Tarheel Tavern is a weekly blog carnival simply from people in North Carolina. It's really different from most carnivals, as most carnivals center around one topic. This one is based on physical location, so you read all sorts of different topics and ideas. Head on over.
Next up is the New Blog Showcase Carnival. This week's host is Dave's Not Here. He brings us the carnival and provides new blogs that didn't even submit themselves. Now that's how to host a carnival.
Keep in mind the New Blog Showcase Carnival is there to show you and introduce you to the newest blogs. Read it and visit -- these are new blogs that might be waiting for YOUR comment! (And do you like the new, silly, layout of the main site?)
Finally, there's a new carnival that might interest you, the Carnival of True Liberties. There's a big pile of links there to various blogs that point out the losses of liberties in this country today. Head on over and read that one, too.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 2 kb.
We Need A Fence
80% of the people of the United States, according to polls, support building a fence along the border between America and Mexico. So why isn't there a fence there? As always, follow the money (and power).
For example, here in North Carolina, you may freely vote in any election in the state if you are here illegally -- including federal elections and presidential elections. Yes, you read that correctly -- any person can enter North Carolina and vote for the President of the United States without fear of prosecution for breaking the law.
How? An unintended consequence of the Motor Voter act. North Carolina has the most relaxed rules for getting driver's licenses, and the motor voter act automatically registers anyone who gets a driver's license to vote. So enter illegally, head to North Carolina, get free stuff, and vote.
A group has proposed building a fence (or wall) along the border. To complain about the cost is silly because we're losing hundreds of billions of dollars already to illegals, so to spend a few billion to stop these criminals only makes sense.
So why won't we build one? Oh, right -- power, money, and votes. Many politicians are scared that if they support building a fence to enforce the law that they will lose the illegal alien vote. Morons (the politicians, not the aliens).
If a few conservative representatives and senators (are they any?) would stand up and demand a fence, they would receive a very large amount of support from the vast majority of American people. Then again, that would require guts, something surely lacking in large amounts in Washington these days.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
11:02 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Nice piece on the border issue! It seems that Americans have woken up the the problem, but the politicians will be willing to sleep through it, hoping they can lure the "new voters" to their sides.
As Karl would say, "Un-frickin'believable!"
Posted by: Libercontrarian at October 10, 2005 03:25 PM (qX/FK)
2
Why in the world would the conservatives buld a fence to keep illegals out, when big, and some small businesses makes tons of money employing the illegals without having to pay them fair wages, or benifits. The politicans who run this country are not going to do anything to piss off their corporate sponsers, and there fore will not give anything, to stop illegal immigration, except lip service.
Posted by: Leo at October 10, 2005 03:51 PM (BFfUN)
3
Good luck in making this happen.
Posted by: Jack at October 10, 2005 03:52 PM (aFawc)
4
Thanks for stopping by, everyone!
Libercontrarian & Jack, yes, it's insane that so many people want their representatives to do something, yet nothing is getting done.
Leo, the only part of your rant that's right is that no politicians will stop illegals -- no liberals will do or so anything. No Republicans will do or say anything. It's not for the businesses, it's for the power and money.
You see, if there are illegals taking money in the form of government benefits, then government gets control over those people and gets to spend money on them -- and that's why they won't stop it, not because of businesses.
Posted by: Ogre at October 10, 2005 04:35 PM (iJFc9)
5
Okay, ya got me! I'm joining the blogburst - I've had a post running around in my brain for several days and so I've finally written it . . .
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 11, 2005 08:07 AM (M7kiy)
6
Awesome, welcome aboard!
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 08:21 AM (/k+l4)
7
Whoa! Just noticed that I mis-typed my blog address (several days ago, probably) so my link was bad. femail does not equal female, LOL - musta been thinking of a bunch of packages I had to mail!
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 11, 2005 08:45 AM (M7kiy)
8
I'm sure there's something Freudian in there...
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 08:51 AM (/k+l4)
9
But, according to the 9/11 Commission, none of the 9/11 hijackers entered the United States by crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, and all of them had visas issued by the US State Department. According to a staff report from the commission, some of the 19 hijackers entered the US several times, always through US airports. The report said, on pages 7 and 8, that the first hijacker flew in through Los Angeles International Airport on Jan. 15, 2000. " All others entered through 8 airports on the East Coast, including 11 entries through New York area airports and 12 through Florida airports." One would-be hijacker, Mohamed al Kahtani, tried to fly in through Orlando but was turned away when he aroused suspicions of an alert Immigration official and later became hostile and gave evasive answers when interrogated.
Posted by: o o at October 26, 2005 10:44 AM (VxJec)
10
Thanks for stopping by, o o --
but I'm concerned also about the millions of other illegals taking tax money and voting without even being citizens.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 10:55 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Whining Not Just American
It seems whining that everything be given to you on a silver platter is not just an American phenomenon. People in India have
joined the chorus in demanding that the rest of the world give them whatever they feel they need because of a natural disaster.
"All the government people, the press people, they are just driving past," said one complainer. Another whined, "No one has come to help us."
What has happened to people? Why is there absolutely no responsibility for anything taken by anyone? Are there no "Real Men" left on the entire planet?
Hey Farid Khan, how about getting up off your rear and volunteering to help others yourself? You have time to talk to the press and demand help, but no time to actually help? Syad Hassan, stop taking time to block roads and force journalists to turn around and start building shelters!
Look, this might sound harsh, but hey folks, this is the real world! IT'S NOT SAFE! YOU ARE NOT GUARANTEED SAFETY IN THIS WORLD!
On the other hand, maybe it's just me. I just know that if I were in the middle of a natural disaster (and I have been), I wouldn't even be talking to the press -- I'd be too busy trying to ensure everyone was safe and had food, water, and shelter myself, without asking, much less demanding, anyone else do anything.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I have the water in the bleach bottles stashed in the garage, and a pantry full of food! Is it just us folks on the right who believe in self-reliance?
Posted by: DagneyT at October 10, 2005 11:33 AM (9uEBP)
2
That's why I ask -- is it just the minority that's self-reliant, or is it a very silent majority?
Posted by: Ogre at October 10, 2005 11:57 AM (/k+l4)
3
It's not a right or left thing. I know plenty on the left that are prepared for a hurricane. Those of us who live in 'cane country are prepared. We aren't silent about it either.
But our attitude is we're gonna take a hit... just the question of when.
I think the Average American who does not live under the threat of natural disaster (tornadoes, hurricanes, fire) are not prepared for anything. It is the minority that is. For sure.
Posted by: Bou at October 11, 2005 12:04 PM (5JHEt)
4
That's why I mention it -- EVERYONE is under the threat of a natural disaster: http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2005/10/10/acts-of-god/
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 12:56 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Go To Space!
Have you been encouraged lately to start your career in science, technology, and mathematics? If you're in North Carolina, perhaps you just haven't been paying attention. Of course, if you're anywhere else in the country, you're just paying for that encouragement.
You see, this past year the North Carolina Legislature, with it's "cut to the bone" budget, managed to give $200,000 to the "NC Space Grant." Just last week the federal government, via NASA, gave another $353,000. The NC Space Grant agency now has over half a million dollars of taxpayer funds to spend.
Space Grant is a program created by Congress to "try to inspire students to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics." That's right, without that half million dollars spent every year, no one would study science, technology, or engineering.
Have you seen your tax dollars today?
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
October 08, 2005
Gone Fishin'

I'm gone for the weekend, fishing in the North Carolina Mountains. See you Sunday night or Monday morning!
Posted by: Ogre at
07:05 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Sissy at October 09, 2005 10:11 AM (27GT7)
2
But, but...you're a giiRRRRRRllll...
Girls don't like fishing...
Posted by: Ogre at October 09, 2005 07:10 PM (iJFc9)
3
Ya knooooow, if you find a girl who likes fishin'... you may just find a mate. Just sayin'... ;-)
Posted by: Bou at October 10, 2005 11:32 PM (5JHEt)
4
Hey, are you trying to play matchmaker?
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 05:31 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 07, 2005
National Novel Writing Month
It's time! Well, it's almost time. Once again this year, as it has been for the past six years, November is National Novel Writing Month -- or for those who like acronyms, it's NaNoWriMo.
What's that? From the web site:
National Novel Writing Month is a fun, seat-of-your-pants approach to novel writing. Participants begin writing November 1. The goal is to write a 175-page (50,000-word) novel by midnight, November 30.
Valuing enthusiasm and perseverance over painstaking craft, NaNoWriMo is a novel-writing program for everyone who has thought fleetingly about writing a novel but has been scared away by the time and effort involved.
Hey, it's loads of fun.
If you have ever dreamed of writing a novel -- and I know many bloggers have -- this is the time to sit down and force yourself to do it. I participated last year and wrote about a Wizard's Adventure. I won (wrote the required number of words), but the story wasn't done.
So if you follow that link above to read the story, you'll get a decent story (not much proofreading, etc.), but it ends rather suddenly. I haven't decided yet this year if I'll continue that story or start a whole new one. I'm leaning towards just starting a new story all over again.
So if you think you want to write, check that site out. Let me know if you join up, we can harass one another to ensure we all finish what we start!
Posted by: Ogre at
02:03 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Writing a novel -- I've written four and am about to finish my fifth -- is not fun. It's a bit like root canal without anesthesia. The only reason to do it is that not doing it would hurt even worse.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at October 07, 2005 03:54 PM (PzL/5)
2
For me, novel-writing is a supreme catharsis that I (most of the time) enjoy immensely. I'm glad to find another NaNoer!
Posted by: Anders Bruce at October 07, 2005 05:28 PM (C6ihx)
3
Interesting position, Francis, interesting.
Thanks for stopping by, both of you!
Anders I LOVE the writing, I just can't find the time. That's why I tried NaNoWriMo last year, to FORCE me to find the time. And I did!
Posted by: Ogre at October 08, 2005 07:54 AM (iJFc9)
4
Ogre: forced subjugation to da muse, that's what you have to do. But I'm gonna pass, tempting as it is.
What would I have to give up? Hmmm... letssee: blogging, playing with the kids, noogie with the Significant OtherHunter, chorus practice, blogging, sleeping, Thanksgiving holiday, a good bit of work, blogging...
I fancied myself an amateur writer in my college and grad school years; wrote several short stories and had a novel going. But being too much of a perfectionist, it became torturous for me. So what did I end up doing instead? I became an editor for my profession! (Go figure.) Now blogging is my catharsis.
Power to you, bud! I know you'll win this year too! (And, hope you caught some fish!)
Posted by: The MaryHunter at October 08, 2005 09:53 AM (SRaIZ)
5
I cannot imagine being able to write a novel. I'm not creative at all. I can only write what I see. I can weave a tale from my past or surroundings, but nothing made up. My brain just doesn't think that way.
Posted by: Bou at October 08, 2005 10:02 PM (5JHEt)
6
TMH, I was surprised at how little I actually had to give up. I found time all over the place that I was just wasting. I'm sure it helps that the words are already in my mind, I just have to get them to paper (computer) -- and since I type pretty darn fast, in an hour I'd get around 3-5,000 words written.
Bou, you need that book, "No Plot, No Problem."
Posted by: Ogre at October 09, 2005 06:27 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Special Days"
This week's
Tarheel Tavern is going to be featured at
Nothing Could Be Finer this weekend.
That blog is operated by Stephen Burr of Charlotte (I think). Now that name sounds very familiar. I wonder if he ran for elected office in Charlotte some time in the past...
Yes, there it is. He ran on the Libertarian ticket for NC House district 103 in 2004. 1,087 votes. The Republican in that won got 18,195; while the token Democrat got 12,463. And Stephen thought that was a "good showing." I don't know -- it was a huge loss, Stephen. I guess it's a good start, but the Libertarians need a lot more than a "start" now.
I do commend you for trying, Stephen, and being willing to fight the cesspool that is the North Carolina Legislature. Please do try again, even if you have to run as a Republican to get elected and then switch your affiliation once you're in!
But the point of this post is that Stephen's 6th wedding anniversary. Congratulations, Stephen! Everyone head over to his blog and wish him a happy day! Therefore, he's made the "theme" (optional) of this week's Tarheel Tavern "Special Days."
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
11:04 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 622 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Thank you very much for the kind words, and for mentioning my blogsite.
Now, as for whether 3.4% of the vote in 2004 was a good showing or not, look even further back to 2000, in the District 6 Co. Commission race. I only got 2.7% of the vote there. So, over 4 years, my vote percentage went up 26%!
If I get the same increases in vote percentages and run for office every 4 years, why, I'll break the 40% mark (enough to win in a 3-way race, theoretically) around 2048. And I'll only be 76 years old! Woo hoo!!!!! ;-)
Later,
Cicero (aka Stephen Burr)
Posted by: Cicero at October 07, 2005 04:56 PM (S35wq)
2
I certainly don't think you should give up, I just want to find some way for you to WIN on that ticket!
Posted by: Ogre at October 08, 2005 07:49 AM (iJFc9)
3
LOL! South of the Border signs, huh? And South of the Border was actually in South Carolina. We were only home to the signs, not even privileged to claim the place! I laugh because one of my dirty secrets is that I worked there one summer in the late 70s.
I love the politics in N.C. - so wonderfully weird and strangely balanced, most years! I remember my daddy voted for Mondale and Jesse Helms in the same election. That's North Carolina politics for ya. Purple state.
Posted by: Laurie at October 10, 2005 04:37 PM (hT4+I)
4
Mondale and Jesse Helms? Laurie, was your Daddy a moonshiner?

Thanks for stopping by!
Posted by: Ogre at October 10, 2005 05:06 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Statutory Rape
Do you vote Democrat? Do you support Democrats? As most of my regular readers know, I'm not a big fan of Democrats or Democrat-supported policies. I attempt, via this blog, to point out the problems and shortcomings of those Democrat policies. Here is yet another example.
The Democrats run the County in Mecklenburg, North Carolina. They decide what goes on in all aspects of government in the county. They decide what crimes get money for prosecution and which crimes will be ignored.
From 2001 to 2004 one hundred and eighty-three GIRLS age 16 and under got pregnant -- from men age 20 and older. In case you didn't see that the first time, that's 183 young girls in middle school or just starting high school that got pregnant by adult males.
Each and every one of those incidences was a felony. Keep in mind, of course, that the 183 there were just pregnancies that resulted in live births -- not the number of times a young girl was raped by an adult male. How many prosecutions were there? Less than 70.
Clearly there is a major problem here. In addition to the 183 live births, there are many others that have abortions, and even more that just don't report the incident. Girls aged 10 to 14 are not supposed to be having babies, much less the relations that lead up to babies! In Charlotte, they are, and they are with men much older than them.
So what do the Democrats want to do about it? Absolutely nothing. County Commissioner Norman Mitchell: "I don't want to waste the community's time on one item when we have a lot of items before us." Apparently he views stopping statutory rape as a waste of time.
County Health officials: "these girls aren't stupid." Yes, the County actually believes that 10 year old girls have sex with adults because they want children and that they're able to make that decision because they're not stupid. The officials certainly are.
Why the lack of willpower to actually enforce the law and protect 11 year old girls from being raped? It seems that the vast majority of the victims are black or Hispanic. According to government officials, this is a "cultural thing," so it should be allowed.
Hey, if we can ignore crimes if it's a cultural thing, my culture doesn't support paying taxes or driving the speed limit. Others' cultures support beheading infidels. Guess we have to ignore all those violations of law, too, don't we?
While at least 183 actual crimes have been committed and there is clear evidence of the crime, and there are likely hundreds more incidents of raping children, the Democrats on the County Council refuse to do anything about it.
Bill James, a Republican on the council, proposed a few simple steps that could help save this children from a lifetime of difficulty. He's been completely ignored by the Democrats.
So, Democrats on the County Council, while they can find time to support and build sports stadiums and raise taxes, somehow cannot find time to help poor blacks and Hispanic children who are raped. Nice job, Democrats.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:01 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 529 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I am absolutely speechless by this. Completely appalled. Feeling glad I live in Florida... again...
Posted by: Bou at October 08, 2005 10:04 PM (5JHEt)
2
That would be the same Bill James who is notorious for making racist remarks about blacks, wouldn't it? James' game is to feed his constituency of unreconstructed rednecks a regular diet of abuse of blacks. Keeps'em mollified while they wait for the South to rise again. Surely, no one is foolish enough to believe that his interest in the topic is benign. Which might be why his racist blather is being ignored.
Local governments have limited ability to enact legislation in regard to health and crime. The proper venue for this issue is the state legislature.
Nor is it a 'black and Hispanic' issue. Older men are disproportionately fathers of teen's babies regardless of race. The current high profile case is out of Kansas. It involves a white 20-something male with a penchant for 12-14 year-old girls.
Posted by: June Gordon at October 08, 2005 11:20 PM (BbT7B)
Posted by: Sissy at October 09, 2005 10:15 AM (27GT7)
4
It's one thing to know this stuff is happening -- it's absolutely INCREDIBLE that the Democrats on the city council DEFEND it!
Posted by: Ogre at October 09, 2005 06:57 PM (iJFc9)
5
Um, June? No, it's NOT Bill James saying these things -- IT'S THE DEMOCRATS ON THE CITY COUNCIL.
It is DEMOCRAT Norman Mitchell who said considering spending any time or money on prosecuting criminals who commit statutory rape is a "waste of time."
And NO, June, as the numbers will clearly show, even if the facts are racist in this case, the vast majority of confirmed cases of statutory rape are committed by blacks and Hispanics. I'm sorry that you don't like the numbers, June.
Posted by: Ogre at October 09, 2005 07:05 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Money Can't Buy Jobs
The state legislature of North Carolina gave Dell, a privately owned company over $250 million. And for those not familiar with how governments work, the state could only give that money to the private company after they took it (by force) from the state's taxpayers.
The state claimed that they were giving all that money to the business (and not to other, smaller businesses) because it would generate jobs that would "help everyone." However, as the Dell plant opens it's doors, the "5,000 to 6,000" jobs that were being purchased by the state (that's around $45,000 per job paid by the state) have yet to materialize.
So far, there's been 135 permanent jobs at suppliers for Dell and about 350 at Dell itself. That's the state paying over $515,000 per job. What a deal.
But, don't worry, reports claim that the jobs will be created...some time in the next 20 years.
Why won't government only do things that government should do and stop trying to social engineer the entire country? It's morally wrong.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
October 06, 2005
Carnival, carnival!
Have you seen this week's Carnival of Liberty? It's up at
Eric's, and it's good. Sure, it's long, but if you want news and views that are freedom and liberty-based, this is THE place to go in the Blogosphere.
Seriously, there's tons of good stuff there. You should be reading it every single week.
Oh, and the late New Blog Showcase did finally show up at Steve The Pirate's. Something about computer trouble or something, I wasn't really paying attention...
Posted by: Ogre at
09:23 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
ACLU and Suicide
This week's topic for the
Stop the ACLU Blogburst is the ACLU and "assisted suicide." I've been debating how to approach this one because of the situation. It's in the news now because the case from Oregon that's at the Supreme Court.
The case that is before the Supreme court, however, has absolutely NOTHING to do with assisted suicide. Keep that in mind -- absolutely nothing.
The case that's before the Supreme Court is about the rights and freedoms of people to make laws that apply to themselves, or if one person appointed to a federal position can nullify any laws passed by a majority of people.
So the ACLU is supporting the case, but not based on it's merits -- they are supporting the case because they support assisted suicide (which has absolutely NOTHING to do with the case in front of the Supreme Court).
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
02:14 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 583 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Ogre - The incapacitated have these decisions made by next of kin - greedy or not - NOW because they decide when/if to pull the plug. What the Oregon law would do is allow them to be proactive, rather than just be a 'DNR' and choose to die.
As long as the decision remains with the person, I don't have a problem with it.
I DO have a problem with the Feds trampling on state's rights.
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 06, 2005 02:36 PM (8DsKX)
2
I'm in a bit of an ethical dilemma, is it wrong to wish that those in the ACLU would practice doctor assited suicide? I'm just saying . . .
Posted by: oddybobo at October 06, 2005 02:41 PM (6Gm0j)
3
Right, Peter, that's my point. If allowing a doctor to actively cause a death IS a valid choice of a person, then ANYONE who can make decisions for that person (or who the state determines who can make that decision) can now kill people. I don't see any way for that sort of decision to ONLY remain with the person under our system of laws.
And Oddy, they, like most on the left, only want rules and things that apply to OTHERS, not themselves...
Posted by: Ogre at October 06, 2005 02:50 PM (/k+l4)
4
Thanks, this one was a tricky topic to tackle, you did great.
Posted by: Jay at October 06, 2005 03:33 PM (2FcUc)
5
Thanks, that's why I was a bit late than normally -- I just wasn't sure how to hit this one for awhile.
Posted by: Ogre at October 06, 2005 03:47 PM (/k+l4)
6
I think this case can put Roberts in a tricky situation. It should be a State's Right thing, according to the 9th and 10th Amendments. However, the drug being used is a federally controlled substance, making it against federal law. Roberts could end up "legislating from the bench" on this one. Were it me, I would say that Oregon is able to allow assisted suicide, but cannot use a federally controlled substance. Which would lead to "how do they do it?" If it is going to be done, it should be done humanely. And, what if Oregon comes up with an alternative that is humane: does the Fed government outlaw that method?
Posted by: William Teach at October 06, 2005 04:08 PM (IRsCk)
7
Yup, it's a tough one. The feds will not give up. This could be similar to the CA and Marijuana one -- CA wants to allow it, but the feds don't. End result COULD be -- go ahead and do it -- the Oregon officials won't arrest anyone, but the federal government might.
And if the feds revoke the doctor's license and Oregon has any guts, they'll issue a state doctor's license. Now THAT would be fun.
Posted by: Ogre at October 06, 2005 05:35 PM (iJFc9)
8
I am not familar with the case you mention (perhaps you could give a link to an article from a news source?), so I won't comment on the specific issue. However, I will comment on a logical fallacy in your argument.
**Ogre Said**
***You see, if a person is allowed to have a doctor kill them, it will be very clear and obvious that if a person is incapacitated, that whoever has power of attorney for that person will then be able to make that exact same decision. Then you've moved down that infamous "slippery slope."***
The "slippery slope" argument has to have three things to be a valid argument. (1) A first step which may or may not be undesirable. (2) Solid chain of evidence that it inevitably leads to the next step, and that step inevitably leads to the third, and so on. And (3) a final result that is clearly undesirable.
The second claim is the one you have failed to prove. You show no evidence that this one step will INEVITABLY, without a doubt, lead to subsequent steps. You have stated the equivalent of "if I let my son throw a snowball at his sister, it's just a slippery slope until he becomes an axe murderer." Or another example, "if we deregulate gun ownership, it's a slippery slope until the country is in a state of anarchy."
Neither my hypothetical statements nor yours ("if we allow assisted suicide, it's a slippery slope to killing incapacitated relatives for their inherritance") includes a direct link between the initial thing, and the final thing. None of the statements can be considered "proven," none of the hypothetical worst-case conclusions are proven, until that direct, inevitable, unstoppable connection from the first item to the last is demonstrated, and neither of us have done so with our statements.
Posted by: zandperl at October 06, 2005 08:10 PM (KHEUn)
9
I'm not sure why you say that a slippery slope argument requires inevitability. In my view, that's the point of a slippery slope argument -- it MIGHT lead to the result, if you progress down the pathway. Clearly this might lead to that result, as can be illustrated with the Schiavo case. However, if the only way you can have such an argument is with total, absolute certainly, than I'm not sure there's anything that can be a slippery slope argument -- except perhaps government expanding and taxing more.
Posted by: Ogre at October 06, 2005 08:24 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Clinton and Greta

On October 24, 2005, Bill Clinton had
an interview with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News. Once again, I know many of my good readers here at Ogre's Politics and Views do not have the time to read all the news and information that exists. So we're happy to provide a summary and translation of the transcript.
*** BEGIN TRANSLATION OF TRANSCRIPT
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: Oh (swooning), oh, oh. (deep breath, pause) OH. Dear, sweet, honorable Mr. Wonderful...err, I mean, Mr. President...
BILL CLINTON, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE BEST PRESIDENT THAT EVER EXISTED AND WHO SHOULD BE PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD: Please, call me Bill.
GRETA FAINTS.
*** 3-minute pause for technical difficulties
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
08:56 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 780 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Holy crap! Bill Clinton is looking more and more like Jimmy Carter all the time. Are they cousins or something?
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 06, 2005 09:23 AM (K+h36)
2
Scary, isn't it? It's the non-tie "casual" look that he's going for, too, I think.
Posted by: Ogre at October 06, 2005 09:57 AM (/k+l4)
3
Mop in aisle 3 please, I mean mop in studio 3 please.
Posted by: Tomslick at October 06, 2005 04:18 PM (xNjHI)
4
What color dress was Greta wearing that day?
Posted by: Ogre at October 06, 2005 05:35 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
85kb generated in CPU 0.0237, elapsed 0.1598 seconds.
98 queries taking 0.146 seconds, 288 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.