January 04, 2006
AP Supports Palensinians
In case you want yet more example of the bias inherent in the press, view
this picture posted by the AP. Their caption:
Um Nidal, mother of three Palestinian martyrs delivering a speech at a celebration at the18th foundation anniversary of Palestinian militant group, Hamas, on Friday Dec.30, 2005, in the Syrian capital, Damascus. Hamas organized a celebration at Yarmouk refugee camp southern Damascus with participation of 2000 palestinians.(AP Photo / Bassem Tellawi)
A more accurate caption:
Um Nidal, mother of three violent, deadly mass murderers, defends the actions of her mass-murdering children at a cermony marking the 18th anniversary of the founding of a cult formed to exterminate the Jewish people from the face of the earth. The murderous extremist group Hamas organized the rally at a camp of like-minded murderers where 2000 racists who hate America and all Jews gathered.
My caption contained more facts.
(H/T to Kender who wants to know why "We think we can win anything when the "MSM" is so far against us?").
Posted by: Ogre at
06:09 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Abu's entire issue should be obliterated. No honor, no memory, no respect, just blown(not like with Monica) out of existence.
Bastards! Bastardettes!
Posted by: Seth at January 04, 2006 10:27 PM (dkHRA)
2
Kender also asked why the woman wasn't arrested at the press conference...
Posted by: Ogre at January 05, 2006 02:18 AM (s2+Ck)
3
Sometimes Palestinians call terrorists martyrs but that is also what they call random people who get shot in the Israeli/Terrorist confrontations. Contrary to often spouted opinion, most Palestinians do not engage in terrorist tactics. It only take a few crazies to cause a lot of trouble.
It is a shame about Sharon it finally looked like we had a chance of peace there.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 05, 2006 04:13 AM (SlODe)
4
Yes, peace.
Like what's happening in and as a result of Sharon's ceding Gaza to the Palestinians.
Very peaceful.
Posted by: Seth at January 05, 2006 07:40 AM (dkHRA)
5
Seth, you can have peace, and you can have it now.
Surrender.
Posted by: Ogre at January 05, 2006 02:03 PM (/k+l4)
6
Surrender: 1. What Sharon did by ceding Gaza. 2. The most aggressive combat strategy taught at the French version of the War College. 3. The easiest way to throw away ones freedom.
Hmmmmm.
No, my friend, I'd rather go down fighting or, better yet, stay up winning!
Posted by: Seth at January 05, 2006 02:10 PM (dkHRA)
7
But you can have peace...
Posted by: Ogre at January 05, 2006 02:14 PM (/k+l4)
8
Pacifists who are not protected by strong, violent men with superior firepower soon learn, much to their chagrin, that the peace they've been striving for carries the price of all freedoms, and a life that would be hell on earth to those of us who want to live free.
I'd rather think about peace when the last threat has been blasted into oblivion and I know that the resulting peace will allow me to live secure and on my own terms.
Posted by: Seth at January 05, 2006 02:46 PM (dkHRA)
9
Unfortunately, it seems that the pacifists that learn that lesson all end up dead -- so all we're left with are pacifists that do not understand evil.
Posted by: Ogre at January 05, 2006 03:00 PM (/k+l4)
10
I'm all for shipping those that don't understand evil(at least the ones who feel it's their duty to obstruct our self defense efforts) off to some places where they'll become experts on it PDQ. The ones that survive would hopefully come back with a different viewpoint, the rest, welllll....
Posted by: Seth at January 05, 2006 03:23 PM (dkHRA)
11
Let's have a bake sale to raise money for airline tickets...but we'll have to ship them from somewhere other than Charlotte since Independence Air just went under, leaving no competition for USAir in Charlotte again.
Posted by: Ogre at January 05, 2006 03:58 PM (/k+l4)
12
I guess you could also have peace by killing every Palestinian man, woman and child too.
I think it is interesting that you said AP supports Palestinians instead of AP support terrorist. Don't see that a person can be a Palestinian and not a killer.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 06, 2006 04:29 PM (SlODe)
13
True. Palestinian and terrorist are pretty much interchangable...
Posted by: Ogre at January 06, 2006 08:08 PM (/k+l4)
14
So why not just kill them all.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 06, 2006 09:33 PM (SlODe)
15
I never advocating killing anyone. ?
Posted by: Ogre at January 07, 2006 12:03 AM (s2+Ck)
16
It seems pretty clear from the Hamas rally these “martyr” were really terrorist. I will give you that. Some of these people don’t know what real martyrdom means.
However, it is quite wrong to equate Palestinians with Hamas. Especially since when they were given a chance to have free election, Hamas ran and did badly. It seems your average Palestinian does not think that blowing up random Israelis in shopping centers is a good idea. (They may feel different about Israel soldiers) It would be like saying the United States supports Ross Perot.
I just think that you are to smart to be equating the digesting crimes of some evil criminals with an entire ethnic group.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 07, 2006 03:08 AM (SlODe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
2004 Election Not Quite Over
While you might remember the ancient history (at least on the internet) that was the 2004 election, it's just not quite over in North Carolina. While in the statewide race the North Carolina Legislature overruled the clear votes of the people and completely ignored rulings of the State Supreme Court to declare their Democrat friend a winner, in another race, things are not yet settled.
At issue is the same problem as with the statewide race that the Democrats settled by ignoring the actual votes of the people and just unilaterally making a decision -- voting out of precinct.
As the State Supreme Court has said at least twice now, the North Carolina Constitution is very clear -- voters MUST vote in their own precinct. In one race for County Commissioner, the Supreme Court also ruled that out of precinct ballots should not be counted.
However, the Democrat-controlled board of elections has continued to ignore the Supreme Court and allowed the Democrat to remain in office while lawsuits continue. The Supreme Court may be set to rule yet again that out of precinct ballots cannot be counted.
Maybe, just maybe, the 2004 election will be finally settled before the 2006 election starts -- but I'm not holding my breath.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.
Charlotte Observer Supports Tax Increase
Well, that's about it. Just read the headline here. Of course, for anyone who has actually READ the Charlotte Observer, that's not really news now, is it? The Charlotte Observer seriously is very socialist. They support every socialist idea that's ever existed.
In this case, they support the increase in gas tax to the 6th highest gas tax rate in the nation. Why? Because they like government spending money and not people. Seriously. They have never, to my knowledge, ever NOT supported any tax increase.
Worse, they lie about it constantly. In the article, they claim that the increased gas tax will be used to repair roads. That's an outright lie. It will not. The majority of funds raised by the gas tax increase (some $74 million) will go into the general fund.
No, it doesn't matter to the Democrat-controlled legislature that the law states that the taxes from gas will be used for road construction -- they vote every year to take tens of millions of tax dollars from gas taxes and toss them in the general fund for things like personal checking accounts for legislatures.
Yes, the Democrat-led North Carolina General Assembly really does stink. And the Charlotte Observer loves them for it.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
Public Rally to support Felon
Last week, supporters of a convicted felon Democrat Congressman
had a rally to help pay his legal bills. This is the second rally to support the convicted criminal who headed to jail last Friday.
Convicted Democrat Party Leader Frank Ballance is supposed to pay $61,000 in restitution for stealing over $100,000 from the state. But he won't have to pay it if his supporters can raise the money for him. Sure, that's restitution, isn't it?
Why do people support him? Because he is the first congressman who was blatantly and openly racist while in the state legislature, according to his supporters. Even though he stole the $100,000+, they claim he did good things with it -- which makes it okay in their eyes.
Sorry, nothing to read about in the mainstream press, despite the fact that this is a Democrat Party member that was elected to Congress who is CONVICTED of stealing large amounts of money -- they're too interested in reporting about Tom Delay's ALLEGED misdeeds.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
January 03, 2006
Bush Kills Bowler
Ok, I think I've got the hang of being a member of the
insanity- reality-based community. Let's give this a shot, shall we?
I saw today that Ed Lorenz died Wednesday. Now while the news reports claim that Ed died of a heart attack while participating in a sport he truly loved (and had perfected -- Ed had rolled a perfect game just a short time before), that's not the whole story -- at least not according to the MBC (moonbat central).
You see, Ed only died because of Bush. Yes, that's right, it's Bush's fault.
Back in 2002, Bush appointed a man, Phil Nottingham, to the head of the federal government agency on product safety commission -- Phil was the assistant vice-executive in charge of bowling and large-ball sporting events. Phil, however, received campaign donations from "Big Bowling" -- and this clouded his judgment.
In 2004, Tim Filiopotous suggested adding a rule change to the international federal government safety rules regarding bowling and suggested that no bowling balls be allowed that were heavier than 16 ounces -- for the children, of course.
Well, Mr. Nottingham, under heavy pressure from President Bush (due to campaign contributions from "Big Bowling") refused to make that rule change -- and thereby sealed Ed Lorenz' fate. For had he been using a 16 ounce ball, the pressures on his body would have been tremendously reduced and poor Ed would have never had a heart attack in the first place.
So President Bush clearly caused Ed Lorenz' death in Portage, MI.
How's that for moonbattery? Well, it's better than the morons that are blaming Bush for the miner's deaths -- my version has more logic to it.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:08 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Again, this does kind of make sense.
Posted by: Contagion at January 03, 2006 11:49 PM (e8b4J)
2
I blame Bush for my warts.
And, for mimes.
And weeds.
That bastard.
Posted by: Stevin at January 04, 2006 12:43 AM (LfL8N)
3
Contagion, stop it, you're scaring the children!
And Stevin -- yes, mimes. I don't know how, but I'm sure Bush is to blame for mimes...I shall have to investigate...
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 01:37 AM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BET Runs from Mainstream America
When Black Entertainment Television (BET) was started, no one thought it would succeed. Then it did. It made piles of money by catering to the wants and desires of people who had black skin -- all, somehow, without being racist (can you imagine a White Entertainment Television?).
They were accepted, grew, and became nearly mainstream. But apparently they didn't like being mainstream, as they just named Loonie Calypso Louis Farrakhan "Person of the Year."
Why? Well because the reality-challenged Farrakhan claimed that blacks were "the indigenous peoples of this hemisphere." Oh, and because he said that blacks should bring a class action suit for "criminal neglect" against the U.S. on behalf of Hurricane Katrina victims.
Instead of picking positive role models, or productive, working people, BET decided to pick a lunatic that can do nothing but race-bait and spend other people's money. Nice job, BET.
(H/T to Smoke Eater).
Posted by: Ogre at
08:08 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Talk about someone who's brain isn't based in reality.
Posted by: Contagion at January 03, 2006 11:50 PM (e8b4J)
2
Ok, I will.
Black Entertainment Television, Louis Farrakhan, John Kerry, The French...
Oh. That wasn't an instruction, was it?
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 01:38 AM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bush Kills Miners
No, the utter and complete hatred of President Bush knows no end for those on the left. Even though as of the writing of this post the fate of the
miners trapped in WV is unknown, that doesn't stop complete and utter lunatics from, yes, you guessed it,
blaming Bush!!
I really can't believe I'm not making this up. But one Scott Shields is actually blaming their deaths on Bush. He claims that Bush, because of his connections with "Big Coal," did this. Now try and follow the logic:
Bush appointed David Lauriski, an executive with 30 years in the coal industry, to head the Mine Safety and Health Administration. In December, 2001, Mr. Lauriski rejected a change to the rules of mining because if he did, "Big Mining" would donate large amounts of money to President Bush. The rule change would have forced this mine to have created a "second escapeway" from the mine exactly where the trapped workers are located. But since that would cost the mining industry money, the rule was disallowed so the mining industry could give that money to Bush, who would then give the money to Mr. Lauriski as a cash reward. And if that one regulation had passed in 2001, this mine (the Sago Mine) would not have gotten 208 citations in 2005 for safety violations and the trapped miners would have just taken the back glass elevator up to the surface when the mine collapsed.
The entire concept of logical thought is completely lost on the left. Completely.
(H/T to Michelle Malkin).
Update: The Ugly American has more on the comments that actually support the Bush blaming during tragedy!
Posted by: Ogre at
05:42 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 283 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I thought they would probably wait to accuse Bush as the miners were found! They're sounding kookier & nuttier as the '06 elections approach...ya gotta love it!
Posted by: DagneyT at January 03, 2006 06:13 PM (IuS8u)
2
I heard this guy died in Minnesota yesterday. The doctors say it was a heart attack, but I'm pretty sure it's Bush's fault...
Posted by: Ogre at January 03, 2006 06:48 PM (/k+l4)
3
It is far worse than that. At least one Commenter flatly states these miners are getting what they deserved by voting for Bush.
Someone needs to find this guy and beat the living snot out of him.
Posted by: The Ugly American at January 03, 2006 07:14 PM (tSRie)
4
Well, they're honest -- they really believe that you should die if you voted for Bush. That IS the Democrat position these days.
Posted by: Ogre at January 03, 2006 07:27 PM (/k+l4)
5
Wait, this actually kind of makes sense. Because that means I can blame Clinton for the death of two police officers I know.
Posted by: Contagion at January 03, 2006 11:40 PM (e8b4J)
6
My personal favorite part of that post is where at the begining he blames Bush, then at the end denies blaming Bush in the update.
Posted by: Contagion at January 04, 2006 12:01 AM (e8b4J)
7
Don't you love it when the left doesn't even wait until the next day or press release before contradicting themselves? It makes it easy for even the slow to see how silly they sound. But for some reason, the left doesn't see it...
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 01:39 AM (s2+Ck)
8
This whole thing makes me want to vomit. May these people rot.
Posted by: Bou at January 04, 2006 02:45 AM (iHxT3)
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 02:55 AM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Advertisers
Once again I would like to introduce a fine blog that has chosen to advertise here at Ogre's Politics and Views. This week it's
What's that about?
It not only features occasional site news and product announcements, but a look into the personal life of the owner, Stephanie Davies. Stephanie hand-makes all of the incense, candles, bath & body products, and other items sold at Mystickal Incense. For this purpose, this is both a personal and business blog. Welcome!
It's very well-designed and easy-to-read with lots of good stuff to read about. And if you like scented soap, you can get over 70 different scented soaps there -- hand made! Neato!
And remember, if you want to rent that space (and get this nifty little plug), you'll have to have a free BlogExplosion account.
Next up, just below that is the BlogAds section. You can add one of these yourself if you like, just like Stop the ACLU did. It's really cheap inexpensive, and once again, you get some "above the fold" advertising and exposure.
Stop the ACLU is a nice place to go when you want some news about the ACLU and what they're doing wrong. And yes, if the ACLU is involved, it probably is wrong. Head on over and see what the latest is -- breaking stories often show up there before many other places in the news or on the web.
And if you're interested in adding your own blogAd, they are only $10 -- just head over there (link also at the bottom of the ad strip) and add your own ad.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:05 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Thank you so much for the spotlight write-up! I really appreciate you taking the time to post all that. And I love your blog here - any blog that hates Bush as much as I do, gets two thumbs up from me! I'm actually *honored* to be renting from you! Keep up the good work and the great information!
Posted by: Stephanie Davies at January 04, 2006 01:53 AM (NFSGB)
2
Glad to point out your site as well -- thanks for advertising. I might have to buy some of that soap here soon...
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 02:04 AM (s2+Ck)
3
I think she really does hate Bush. I don't think she read you site at all. She was making fun of religion when I went to her site. It is a shame I really love fancy soaps.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 04, 2006 03:00 PM (SlODe)
4
I tried to read mostly the posts about soap and hair wraps...
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 03:56 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Laws for 2006
In case you were of the same opinion of the complete and total idiots, morons, and other assorted freedom haters in the North Carolina General Assembly, you'll be overjoyed to know that North Carolina has
37 new laws that went into effect Jan 1, 2006.
Among the new laws:
- Making running a day care business even harder with new "licensing laws."
- Making earning money as a plumber more difficult with new "licensing laws."
- Making earning money as a heating contractor more difficult with new "licensing laws."
- Making credit card insurance more difficult to obtain and use with new "changes."
- Making health insurance even worse with new, higher rates mandated by the state.
- Making health insurance even more expensive by forcing people to cover high risk people against their will.
- At least 28 taxes raised including the gas tax by 5% and cable television tax by 7%.
- Smoking in jail is now prohibited.
- Making health insurance more expensive by adding a new required registry.
- Making insurance more expensive by increasing the fees required by a business who dares to do business in the state.
- Making prescription medicine more expensive by raising the fees paid by pharmacies.
- Making fishing and hunting licenses more expensive.
Say, "Thank you, Democratic Party of North Carolina."
Posted by: Ogre at
02:05 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That sounds like par for the course in most governments anymore.
Posted by: Contagion at January 03, 2006 11:43 PM (e8b4J)
2
North Carolina is starting to resemble, eerily, Washington State. I'd recommend investing in coffee, flannel, and yak fur.
Posted by: Stevin at January 04, 2006 12:45 AM (LfL8N)
3
I don't see the problem with the no smoking in jail rule. Jail isn't supposed to be a pleasant place, and making convicted criminals go cold turkey doesn't seem so bad considering that our prisons have basketball courts and cable tv.
Posted by: Flannel Avenger at January 04, 2006 01:16 AM (L/pSd)
4
I recommend moving to a free state -- New Hampshire comes to mind...
And don't get me started on jail, Flannel Avenger. I think they should spend their time making big rocks into small rocks and growing their own food -- perhaps even making restitution for what they did. But according to liberals, that's "cruel and unusual punishment."
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 01:34 AM (s2+Ck)
5
I agree wholeheartedly. I think they have the concept of prison and day spa confused.
Posted by: Flannel Avenger at January 04, 2006 03:10 AM (L/pSd)
6
It's clear to me -- you're to be rewarded for committing a crime because it's not your fault.
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 11:51 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC Lottery Costs
Remember that North Carolina "education" lottery? Where the "proceeds" will go ONLY to schools? Oh, well, except for "expenses." Like the director.
South Carolina has noticed that North Carolina's lottery "director" will earn $235,000 for his first year -- the highest pay of any lottery director in the country. And his "deputies" will earn $125K - $130K per year -- more than most directors make.
Good thing it's for the children, huh?
Posted by: Ogre at
10:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Exactly. On our
Front Page yesterday there was an article on a "Pitch for slots' tax may turn to lemons". It mentions that the politicians say 'unlike the lottery, the money would
supplement education dollars, not replace them'. If you believe that, I have some swamp land to sell you for $500k.
Posted by: vw bug at January 03, 2006 01:49 PM (UA4mV)
2
The legislators in NC tried to refute that claim by writing into the legislation that the new lottery dollars will not "replace" current dollars. And there's actually some people who believe it.
Posted by: Ogre at January 03, 2006 02:01 PM (/k+l4)
3
It's very easy to determine what the politicians are gonna do next. They're wearing their WWBHD bracelets (What Would Boss Hogg Do?)
Posted by: Flannel Avenger at January 04, 2006 03:12 AM (L/pSd)
4
I thought their braclets were "WWaPOSd"...
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 11:52 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 02, 2006
Around the 'sphere
Starting to get back into the regular swing of things, and I'm out reading what everyone else is writing about (and heck, if you want to trackback to this post to let others know what you're writing, feel free to). Here's a few highlights:
GM Roper has a post about diagnosing the left. He's a mental health professional, and this is a long, detailed post describing a serious mental problem.
Always on Watch has a nice piece about celebrations to attend in 2006. I might have to take a trip by Jamestown. Again.
Cao has an interesting post up that describes another example of NBCs utter and total hatred for anything Christian. No, that's not an extreme statement, it's a statement of truth.
CatHouse Chat is absent while I'm sure completely enjoying the holidays. Meanwhile, she's been playing with Photoshop. One day I'll get that good -- well, when days have about 28 hours so I have enough time...
Choose Life describes how one state has managed to work how an independent coalition of states is suppose to work -- allowing the people of the state to decide issues for themselves. What a concept.
Daisy Cutter has a new Senate candidate. I think there's serious potential there.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
02:00 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 524 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Reverse psychology, right? lol, Unless you really don't like my puns, and then I'll cry! :-( Have a great New Year! Lyn at Bloggin' Outloud
Posted by: Lyn at January 03, 2006 11:05 PM (VfO5Y)
2
They were so good, they were bad! If you get my meaning...
Posted by: Ogre at January 04, 2006 01:28 AM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wow
Wow. All I can say is, "Wow."
Posted by: Ogre at
12:55 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: anthonylemons at January 02, 2006 01:10 AM (arCcM)
2
Yep. That was good. Thanks for pointing it out. Lyn from Bloggin' Outloud
Posted by: Lyn at January 02, 2006 01:12 AM (VfO5Y)
3
I'll be back - it's off-line right now...
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at January 02, 2006 05:40 AM (BUvm0)
4
Naw, I don't think WOW covers it enough, I think AWESOME would better describe it.
Thanks, Ogre!
Coincidentally, speaking of J.W., I rewatched(for at least the hundredth time over the years) The Green Berets in the wee hours of this morning.
Posted by: Seth at January 02, 2006 01:59 PM (dkHRA)
5
There's been a pile of John Wayne and Clint Eastwood movies on the past week. And all are great.
Know what Wayne movie I haven't seen in a long time I liked? The Quiet Man.
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 02:00 PM (s2+Ck)
6
Good one, I haven't seen that one in a few years.
I watched "2 Mules for Sister Sara" this morning, also. Shirley and Clint were a great team.
Posted by: Seth at January 02, 2006 06:46 PM (dkHRA)
7
Yeah, that's a classic one.
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 10:30 PM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 01, 2006
Pay Raises for Judges?
There's an
interesting article on the Fox News web site that talks about Chief Justice John Roberts has asked Congress for a rather substantial pay raise for judges -- as much as a 30% pay raise -- Roberts' salary would go from $212,100 to $275,730. Wow.
I bet most of you are already screaming at the screen about that one (well, except for Oddy). As much as I'm opposed to government spending on just about everything, this is one of the very few functions of government that government IS supposed to do -- so I support the suggested increase.
Why? Because while I know the average reader would love a 30% increase in their salary -- imagine if you hadn't had an increase of more than 0.5% in the last 40 years. In a free market, which the government has to participate in regarding judges, a majority of people will follow the money.
Right now, many judges are faced with continuing work as a judge or making considerably more money as a private pond scum-sucking lawyer. Therefore, the best and brightest often choose to avoid being a judge. In addition, the judges may be more susceptible to bribes. If their pay is increased to be competitive, more qualified people would consider becoming and staying a judge.
So feel free to meet with your Congresscritter during the "holiday" break -- tell them to support catapulting illegals and raising judges' pay. Where do they get the money? How about stopping giving so much to "victims."
Posted by: Ogre at
02:37 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Very true. A for a professionals living in Washington 200,000 is not very much money. For a lot of people it would be stupid to take a pay cut just to have more stress and that is what being a judge would be.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 01, 2006 05:47 PM (SlODe)
2
Indeed! Call your Congressman!
Posted by: Ogre at January 01, 2006 06:11 PM (s2+Ck)
3
Normally I would agree with every point you made - except for one thing.
That little starting figure of $212,000.
Anyone who would take another job rather than settle for $212,000, or who makes $212,000 and would still find a bribe tempting, is far, far too interested in money for a position in the justice system.
or the government, for that matter..
Posted by: The Small Town hick at January 02, 2006 02:24 AM (RmWaw)
4
There is certainly too much money in politics. But the solution to that is easy -- get government out of all the things they don't belong in!
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 03:06 AM (s2+Ck)
5
Expect it to pass.
I understand the judge's pay grade just happens to be the same as congress.
Congress loves to be nice to judges = but doen't mention they get the 30% raise also.
This was the case twenty some odd years ago, I imagine the farce still continues.
In the peoples republic of kalifornia, our conservitive governator has proposed a $1.00 raise in the minimum wage. That is a healthy percentage increase from 6.75 also.
Why not make the minimum pay $500.00 per hour, then everyone could afford a house?
Posted by: allan at January 02, 2006 06:47 AM (mtOg8)
6
No, that's not quite right.
Judges have not been getting the pay raises that Congress has -- it's a different department.
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 02:02 PM (s2+Ck)
7
And don't get me started on minimum wages. Completely different topic!
Thanks for stopping by!
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 02:02 PM (s2+Ck)
8
I support the pay raise proposal for judges 100%.
I agree with you, Ogre, that given our market based economy and given the importance of competent judges, we need to pay what the marketplace demands to maintain an appropriately staffed legal system.
Like anyplace else, the best and the brightest go where the money is, leaving behind the worst and the dimest(just call tech support at any computer firm or ISP for a prime example).
Posted by: Seth at January 02, 2006 02:14 PM (dkHRA)
9
I think that's racist of you to say, Seth. Hold on, I'm calling the thought police for confirmation....
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 02:19 PM (s2+Ck)
10
The thought police will have to bring in the ACLU for legal support, the ACLU will have to go off across the countryside in search of one of the worst and dimmest(no, wait, they could go to Dell or SBCYahoo! tech support and find one quickly, picking one out while blindfolded) to be the plaintiff, then they'll have to file a suit against me for the trauma my bigoted, oppressive, just plain mean statement has brought into the formerly serene existence of the poor, hard-done-to worst and dimmest wretch.
By then, I'll have resold my house, changed my name and taken to the high, snowy hills, where they'll never find me, heh heh heh...
Posted by: Seth at January 02, 2006 06:42 PM (dkHRA)
11
Leave room for me to build a cabin next door!
Posted by: Ogre at January 02, 2006 10:29 PM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
66kb generated in CPU 0.0295, elapsed 0.124 seconds.
96 queries taking 0.1065 seconds, 275 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.