February 19, 2006
Pornographic Dancing
I wasn't aware that
pornographic dancing was an event at the Olympics. Obviously it is.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:39 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Just in case you weren't aware of something else...this post is NOT funny...
Posted by: eV at February 20, 2006 09:40 AM (l+dqu)
2
Excellent! It wasn't supposed to be!
Posted by: Ogre at February 20, 2006 02:13 PM (2IrwV)
3
Everytime I run across something on the Olympics, I'm like "crap, forgot about them." I have no idea what is going on with them. I hate tape delay, unless it is highlights, and NBC spends more time on everything but showing the events. I could care less what they are wearing, and what their hometown is like, etc. Show the darn events!
Hey, check out the new design. Moved everything to Wordpress!
Posted by: William Teach at February 20, 2006 06:57 PM (TFSHk)
4
I've been watching tons of coverage this year.
The tape delay is annoying, but if you just avoid coverage during the day, the night feels like live to me...
Posted by: Ogre at February 20, 2006 07:24 PM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Federal Taxes
Ogre's not here.
Ogre's working on his federal taxes.
You do NOT want know Ogre's thoughts while he is working on the f-ing federal taxes. Trust me.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:49 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ogre, have you heard about a new idea that I think either Billary or sKerry may propose this session? In stead of all the forms we have now they will finally simplify the tax code.
The new form will have two lines only.....
Line 1 - How much did you make?
Line 2 - Send it in!
Posted by: Smoke Eater at February 19, 2006 09:43 PM (K7uqT)
2
OH - BTW - Not to add fuel to the fire, but I not only finished my taxes over 2 weeks ago, but I have already received (and spent) my refund!
Posted by: Smoke Eater at February 19, 2006 09:44 PM (K7uqT)
3
I remember the days of EZ form filing.
My tax return, when I'm done (some time next week or so) will be around 300 pages long.
Posted by: Ogre at February 19, 2006 10:38 PM (2IrwV)
4
Hi Ogre!
Forgive me if I'm missing it, but I paid to rent your blog this week. It's already been more than 24 hours and I don't see the little "rent my blog" thumbnail, nor any mention of my site here. Am I missing it? Thanks!
-Dawn
Posted by: writewingnut at February 20, 2006 12:24 AM (FkOrl)
5
It should be all the way at the top of that left column. You don't see it?
Posted by: Ogre at February 20, 2006 02:26 AM (2IrwV)
6
My taxes took me less then 15 minutes to do.
Posted by: Contagion at February 20, 2006 08:21 PM (e8b4J)
Posted by: Ogre at February 20, 2006 08:26 PM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 18, 2006
Saturday Sermon of the Liberal Church
GM Roper of GM's Corner is fighting cancer. A group of bloggers silently known as the South Park Republicans have joined
GM in his fight. Over the next few weeks, the Liberal Church will be travelling from blog to blog and all donations made will go to aid GM in his fight against cancer. If you would like to donate by snail mail, we are working on a way for you to be able to do that. Cancer can be a very costly battle and your help is greatly appreciated. Please add a "Fight On" ribbon to your blog. Donations can be made during this post. Find the participants of "Fight On".
South Park Republicans
First Church of
Democrats
Bringing liberals closer to God since 2006
proudly talking liberalism in the bible belt
Worship songs play -
"Dick shot the Lawyer" - Choir (Update of I Shot the Sheriff)
"Shot in the Dark" - Choir
"If Dick Listened to PETA" - Choir
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
08:40 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1735 words, total size 16 kb.
1
I must tell you, that I come here sometimes and I have no idea what's what when I read your stuff. Today I just had to finally break down ask you rather than wonder.
Pray tell, what's the connection between GM and the 1st Church of Democrats?
Posted by: Michele at February 19, 2006 03:55 AM (beN4P)
2
If you understood everything, I'd have to quit.

The idea here is that there's a weekly traveling sarcasm sermon that wanders from blog-to-blog, hoping to pass the donation plate to get some donations to help out GM.
So, directly, there's no relationship, it's just an entertaining and silly way to attempt to raise a little money for a good cause.
Posted by: Ogre at February 19, 2006 10:48 PM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 17, 2006
Little Bird
I'm outside and you're not!
Posted by: Ogre at
08:08 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: vw bug at February 18, 2006 01:38 AM (xLfaI)
Posted by: Ogre at February 18, 2006 02:17 PM (2IrwV)
3
Right, a Norwegian Blue,,,,beau iful plumage.
Posted by: Tomslick at February 18, 2006 04:45 PM (xNjHI)
4
No, no, it's an African swallow.
Posted by: Ogre at February 18, 2006 08:42 PM (2IrwV)
5
But can it carry a coconut when the coconut is tied to it's leg with a string?
Posted by: Smoke Eater at February 18, 2006 09:24 PM (K7uqT)
6
Arthur: So? We have ridden since the snows of winter covered this land.
Through the kingdom of Mercia, through...
Guard: Where'd you get the coconuts?
Arthur: (somewhat taken aback) We found them.
Guard: Found them? In Mercia? The coconut's tropical!
Arthur: What do you mean?
Guard: This is a temperate zone!
Arthur: The swallow may fly south with the sun, or the house maarten or the
plummer may seek warmer climes in winter, but these are not strangers
to our land!
Guard: Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate?
Arthur: Not at all! They could be carried.
Guard: (indcredulous) What, a swallow, carrying a coconut?
Arthur: It could grip it by the husk!
Guard: It's not a question of where 'e grips it! It's a simple question of
weight ratios! A five-ounce bird could *not* carry a one-pound
coconut!
Arthur: (exasperated)
Well it doesn't matter! Will you go and tell your master that Arthur
from the court of Camelot is here!
(pause)
Guard: Listen. In order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow needs to
beat its wings forty-three times every second, right?
Arthur: Please!
Guard: (patiently) Am I right.
Arthur: I'm not interested!
( A second guard appears on the rampart. )
G2: It could be carried by an African swallow!
G1: Oh, yeah, an African swallow, maybe, but not a European swallow, that's
my point.
G2: Oh, yeah, I agree with that.
Arthur: (extremely exasperated) Will you ask your master if he wants to join
my court at Camelot!!
(pause)
G1: But then of course, African swallows are non-migratory.
G2: Oh yeah...
Posted by: Tomslick at February 20, 2006 01:11 PM (xNjHI)
Posted by: Ogre at February 20, 2006 02:15 PM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Marine Jokes
We've all heard about the "Old Corps" from those "Old Salts." Here's a story I heard a while back, and there's no doubt in my mind that it's true.
Back in 1775, in Tun's Tavern, recruiting started for the new Marine Corps. The very first Marine enlistee came in, signed the papers and took an oath. He was then told to go outside and wait for the other enlistee's to go through the process. They would assemble later on the front yard.
After a few minutes the second enlistee came out and had a seat on the steps, beside the first. The first man looked at the second and began, "Son, let me tell you about the Old Corps."
*****************************************
A retired US Marine was looking for a new job. He finally found one that appealed to his interests. At the interview, he was asked, "Do you have any military experience?"
The Marine replied, "Why, yes! I've been in the Marines for a couple of years."
"I see," said the interviewer, "any disabilities?"
The Marine looked at him and replied shakily. "Well... In the Vietnam War I had a grenade go off between my legs, blowing off my testicles."
The interviewer, quite shocked, said "All right, you're hired. Please report to work on Monday at 10:00am."
"Wait wait!" shouted the Marine, "When do the others start? I don't want any special treatment just because of my disability."
The interviewer replied, "Well... I'll tell you the truth. Everyone normally comes at 7:00 in the morning, but nothing gets done until 10. All we do is sit around, scratching our nuts trying to figure out what to do."
Posted by: Ogre at
05:05 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
Speedy Gonzalez
Even wonder what happened to Speedy Gonzalez -- the cartoon guy?
Kender has
found him.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
Finally Friday
It's been a long week for the Ogre. And it's been a painful week -- but it's been a good week. I see the news and read about all the horrible evil that happened this week. But I also see the good that happens, like the gold medal winner who donated his "winnings" from the Olympics to helping kids in Africa. Some weeks, the evil seems to be stronger. But the saying "It's all good" can work in so many ways.
So, while One Happy Dog puts up her funnies each Wednesday (don't miss 'em), I save my ultimate silliness for Fridays. I'm trying to not comment on and just plain ignore all the crap for just one day. It doesn't mean evil is winning -- sometimes evil can be defeated by simply ignoring it.
Unfortunately, that's not often. In this country, where the war between good and evil really has come down to freedom vs. socialism/communism/totalitarianism/etc, the war is very difficult. Why? Because if you live by the golden rule in America, you lose!
You see, I want to be left alone. I want to be free to enjoy the fruits of my labor, and I don't want to tell anyone else what to do. If I follow that path, those who want to suppress me and my freedom will do so, because I am NOT telling them what to do. That's what makes this fight so difficult -- because I have to do what I do not want to in order to win.
I have to pay attention to the wrongs that are committed -- I cannot mind my own business. I have to openly attempt to expose those who want to hide, rather than enjoy the fruits of my labor -- because if I don't, they simply will continue to take and suppress me and freedom.
But, as I started to say, it's Friday -- a day to relax a little bit and try to enjoy life a little more. So today, I'm going to post just silliness all day (if I can avoid all the crap), and then I'm going to take off work early and go take some pictures of some birds or something.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:37 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 373 words, total size 2 kb.
1
*sticks tongue out at Ogre* *runs away*
Posted by: oddybobo at February 17, 2006 02:06 PM (6Gm0j)
2
I wave my private parts at your Aunties!
Posted by: Ogre at February 17, 2006 02:21 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Government Schools want cash
I know, that's not really news. Government schools freely admit now that they only amount of money they need is "MORE."
Here, the state university system (100% pork, useless spending), has compiled their wish list for the next year's budget. The idea there IS such a thing as a wish list is appalling.
They want:
- Multimillion dollar computers
- Cash for 7,000 students
- An institute for fruit science
- A research center in Kannapolis
- A research center in Hickory
- A biomedical-engineering institute
Oh, and the officials want the money that's spent to BUILD all these building to become a PERMANENT part of the budget. In other words, they want hundreds of millions to build buildings -- and once they're done, they want that hundreds of millions to be theirs every year to spend as they want.
There's one correct and appropriate answer to every single one of these "requests" on the "wish list":
NO
But then again, that would be the responsible answer -- so don't look for the Democrats that run the state to give that answer. Instead, they'll just raise my taxes to give them the money.
Oh, how I yearn for freedom.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:01 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We'll remember this the next time you have a heart attack and use a drug discovered and tested at UNC-CH. Or, the next time you drink water that is not filled with pesticides and hog waste.
I don't agree with keeping any building money permanently, but I also don't agree with going backwards just to save a few bucks per person. We've seen just how the private system works when given free reign thanks to the Republic Party being in control in Washington. Oil and Insurance companies rake in record profits while real wages drop, benefits decrease, and services disappear.
Utopia for a Republic? Aristocracy. It sounds like your a worker, so welcome to the peasant class my friend.
Posted by: Robert P at February 17, 2006 03:02 PM (7X7vQ)
2
I hope they build that research center here soon in Kannapolis since I need a job. Sounds like a tech guy is what they need.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at February 17, 2006 03:20 PM (5+Jvh)
3
Robert, your view of people is horribly depressing and fatalistic. You assume that if government does not do something then it simply will not be done. That says that people in a capitalist society will do nothing -- they will not discover or research drugs, and they will only make pesticides that kill people. I'm sorry that you are so depressed and have such a poor view of free people.
And your "real wages" line is total crap, utterly unsupported by reality, and you know it.
Arbitrator? Stop encouraging them!
Posted by: Ogre at February 17, 2006 04:00 PM (/k+l4)
4
Sorry Ogre,
But take a look at our health insurance - capitalist society has driven it into the ground to the point that 48 million Americans have no insurance. Including 50% that work, but have no health care benefits, so real wages are not crap. But, you already know that. Real wages would allow people to eat AND see the doctor.
I'm not depressed at all, thankfully the Federal Government does support research that private companies would never fund.
You forget that when capitalism had its way, millions died each year from work accidents (I just saw a recent stat that 36,000 brakemen died every year on trains at the turn of the century), people starved, children spent all week in the sweat shop. If you think it is so different today, just look around the world.
And, don't forget the wonders brought to us by cigarette companies, asbestos manufacturers, and pharm companies - all of whom knowingly killed people for the sake of profits.
Not even a right-wing nutbag can believe that corporations don't need oversight. Too many examples proving the opposite.
Posted by: Robert P at February 21, 2006 01:02 PM (V/N23)
5
Wow. You may not think you are depressed, but you do have a horribly depressing, fatalistic view of everyone else but yourself. Based on your posts, you actually believe that nothing will happen without the federal government. You believe that companies will willingly kill millions of people just because they can get away with it.
And as for your claim that capitalism has made health insurance unavailable, that's verifiable wrong. The reason health care is not available for so many people is because government regulation has made it that way.
I want to buy insurance that will provide me catastrophic coverage for major accidents and hospitalization only. Government will not allow me to buy that coverage. Government will only permit me to purchase complete and total insurance covering AIDS, depression, alcoholism, mental health, acupuncture, and tons of other crap I DON'T WANT.
That's why insurance costs so much -- GOVERNMENT and only government.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2006 01:45 PM (/k+l4)
6
Wait, you think it was the government that was behind the law that makes you buy EVERY KIND OF insurance? You don't think the $150 million a year that certain insurance industry groups spend on lobbying was MAYBE, JUST MAYBE used to push, write, and pass these kinds of laws?
You think the insurance industry is so kind, they want to sell you a nice small policy at low-cost, but those mean men in D.C. MAKE them sell you the all-in-one at 10 times the cost? Please.
"You believe that companies will willingly kill millions of people just because they can get away with it." .....yeah, I think that is pretty much proven.
Cigarettes, Enron, Benzene, Asbestos, Arsenic, Mercury, PCBs - the list goes on and on.
No matter how brainwashed you are, you can't serious believe that today's companies would police their own pollution and remove carcinogens if the government wasn't forcing them to, right? There is one example, Tylenol I think, that people bring up over and over. But, just look at all the industry's asking Bush for cover from their bad behavior. Capitalism without regulation is a stupid idea. Capitalism with regulation is a great idea and what helped make our country the greatest in the world.
Have you ever read The Jungle, or any of the other reports about working conditions before government regulation? Or, have you traveled to any third world countries or seen the reports about slavery, forced labor, child labor, and all the other things that go on in third world countries? Or, how about the incredibly high death rate among illegal immigrant workers right here in the U.S. That is the best proof that companies do not care at all about their workers, the fact that they kill off illegal immigrants because they are "disposable".
Posted by: Robert P at February 21, 2006 02:43 PM (V/N23)
7
Hold on, let me go check ...
Yup, the insurance industry didn't pass any laws -- only legislatures do that.
By stating your belief that companies kill people because they can shows that I cannot have an intelligent debate with you. Heck, you have clearly stated that you would kill me if you could get away with it.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2006 02:57 PM (/k+l4)
8
Loud rather than right.
Corporations have and will continue to kill people in the name of profit. Not every corporation, but enough that laws are necessary to regulate them. Look at the top 20 companies to work with from Fortune. These are companies that make money and yet still manage to pay living wages with health and retirement benefits. The other companies like cigarette manufacturers are killing people for MORE profit, not just for profit.
When, exactly, did I say I would kill you if I could get away with it? Loud, rather than right.
Posted by: Robert P at February 21, 2006 03:08 PM (V/N23)
9
Oh, I see, it's not YOU that would kill me, just everyone else on the entire planet. That doesn't strike you as an odd position to hold? That doesn't seem to you to be utterly fatalistic? You have proposed that only you (and government with force, run by "the right people") are good and everyone else is bad and evil.
That's what I'm talking about when I say you have an absolutely horrible view of people... other than yourself and the "right" people running government, of course.
Open your mind some day and look around. You might find that people are nicer than you give them credit for.
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2006 04:00 PM (/k+l4)
10
Common neocon misconception, corporations are not people. They do not have the rights of people, they are not "persons". People are nice, my neighbors are nice, my Republican Dad is nice, the people at last weekends chili cookoff were nice, lots of people are nice.
Many corporations, and again you choose to ignore nuance because...well, you're a neocon, MANY corporations care more about profits than human life.
You've never denied that Enron, cigarettes, asbestos producers, etc have put profits before people. You can't. It's clear, they have.
Posted by: Robert P at February 21, 2006 09:48 PM (7X7vQ)
11
I see. So these corporations, that are not people, that are not run by people, are evil automations that kill people whenever they get the chance, just because they can. No actual people would actually do this, just the evil corporations.
You know, I formed a corporation just last year. I have yet to see it launch itself into violence and killing. I shall hide under my desk just in case it does. Someone, quick, please regulate my corporation before it kills me.
Robert, do you really not see how utterly insane that sounds? Corporations kill, but people are nice. Where did the corporations come from?
Posted by: Ogre at February 21, 2006 09:58 PM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 16, 2006
Drunks Support Denmark
The mostly terrorist mulsim world continues to attempt to boycott Denmark because Denmark has not proclaimed islam the national religion of the country. Yes, that's why, it's not because of some cartoons, it's because the muslims have a mission to convert the entire world to islam, with violence when possible.
The civilized world is responding by trying to get everyone to buy MORE products from Denmark. Everyone knows about the little cookies, and perhaps even about the Danish hams. But I was reminded today by Le Sabot Post-Moderne that drunks can support Denmark, too!
You see, Carlsberg Beer is made in Denmark. And in case you can't read that page (it's not English), head to the English site. And this store will actually ship the beer right to your house (if your state will allow them to -- NC does, surprisingly!).
So, you drinkers, let's have a holiday and support crushing terrorism at the same time! Drink a Carlsberg!
Posted by: Ogre at
07:03 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And the Muslims are different than Christians how? The Christians are just as violent as the Muslims as evidenced by our 'holy war' against Iraq.
Posted by: Raven at February 16, 2006 09:10 PM (V5Zbt)
2
Good suggestion. One case of Carlsberg will be forthcoming.
That sure doesn't sound like the Raven we know now does it?
Posted by: Tomslick at February 16, 2006 09:29 PM (xNjHI)
3
Not surprisingly I've had that beer before, not one of my favorites.
Posted by: Contagion at February 16, 2006 11:09 PM (e8b4J)
4
I've just finished 12 Carlsbads. To show my support of Denmark.......Or, was it the Netherlands? Some country in Europe. Maybe it was Morocco. Country is a funny word. Have you ever noticed. I really have to pee! Wow, that lady is really hot! Hi honey, how ya doing? Oh, wait, that's the vacuum.
Posted by: Stevin at February 17, 2006 12:44 AM (LfL8N)
5
That's not our Raven, Tomslick, that's a Bush-hater-above-all Raven. Thanks for stopping by, Raven, let me know when you'd like to meet the real world. Apparently you are a member of a group that calls itself "Christian" that is in a holy war with Iraq. I'm not aware of such a group, but would be glad to join up!
And Contagion, just drink the damn beer and stop whining!

Stevin? Oh Stevin? Up here. No, over here. Oh, never mind.
Posted by: Ogre at February 17, 2006 12:25 PM (/k+l4)
6
That's not our Raven.
The Raven that posted the above comment is obviously a member of that club that finds it difficult to perform the concurrent activities of ambulation and mastication, and far be it from this commentor to point out the obvious and apparent diminishment of the collective mental acumen of the readers of this esteemed and worthwhile electronic slice of the ether of cyberspace, but comments such as the one from the Raven that posted above here certainly contribute to that occurance and certainly cause society as a whole to be brought down to the level of slavering simpletons while making it clear why so many vote with their emotions and not their logic or intelligence.
To paraphrase that for you Raven, (as I know your grasp of the language MUST be limited given your insipid comment above);
You are too stupid to walk and chew at the same time, and we are all stupider from having read what you wrote, and idiots like you bring down the collective IQ of the world and make it apparent why so many people vote democrat.
Posted by: kender at February 17, 2006 09:51 PM (/mKfY)
7
Don't you hate when you read things that actually seem to suck your intelligence?
Posted by: Ogre at February 18, 2006 02:16 PM (2IrwV)
8
You are rallying drunks in support of denmark.....lol and you wonder why the muslim world is boycotting all there goods. I support the boycott whole heartedly, I have even started buying american keebler butter cookies.
If they dont want to listen peacefully ( cause that didnt work before the riots and attacks) then hit em where it hurts... I mean really REALLY hurts..... their wallets.
Islam is the true way
Posted by: mezmoerize at February 23, 2006 09:03 AM (MSKdW)
9
That's what's so fun about boycotts -- everyone can pick their own side and we can see who wins!
Posted by: Ogre at February 23, 2006 11:10 AM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACLU HATES Good
I know it's beating a dead horse for me to continue to make the same argument, but the Boy Scouts have been an honorable organization since their founding.
In 1908, the Boy Scouts were founded in Great Britain by Lord Robert Baden-Powell. It didn't take long for Scouting to make its way to the United States when an American was exposed to the helpful nature of the British Scouts.
In 1909 in London, England, An American Visitor, William D. Boyce, lost his way in a dense fog. He stopped under a street lamp and tried to figure out where he was.
A boy approached him and asked if he could be of help.
"You certainly can," said Boyce. He told the boy that he wanted to find a certain business office in the center of the city.
"I'll take you there," said the boy.
When they got to the destination, Mr. Boyce reached into his pocket for a tip.
But, the boy stopped him. "No thank you, sir. I am a Scout. I won't take anything for helping."
"A Scout? And what might that be?" asked Boyce.
The boy told the American about himself and about his brother scouts. Boyce became very interested.
After finishing his errand, he had the boy take him to the British Scouting office.
At the office, Boyce met Lord Robert Baden-Powell, the famous British general who had founded the Scouting movement in Great Britain.
Boyce was so impressed with what he learned that he decided to bring Scouting home with him.
On February 8, 1910, Boyce and a group of outstanding leaders founded the Boy Scouts of America. From that day forth, Scouts have celebrated February 8 as the birthday of Scouting in the United States.
more...
Posted by: Ogre at
05:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1593 words, total size 10 kb.
Another Updated Fairy Tale
After reading my expanded and updated tale about
The Little Red Hen,
Oddy points out
another re-telling of a classic: the Grasshopper and the Ant, by Jim Quinn.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:02 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Your commments work here, but not on your ACLU post.
Posted by: Contagion at February 16, 2006 11:29 PM (e8b4J)
2
I was going to say the same thing, for some reason we cannot comment on your aclu(natic) post.
Posted by: Smoke Eater at February 16, 2006 11:51 PM (K7uqT)
3
Yes, I shut them off on that one because I really didn't want to listen to anyone attempt to support the "good" the ACLU does. That one just really, really pissed me off.
Posted by: Ogre at February 17, 2006 12:26 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terrorist Memorial
The construction of the memorial to celebrate terrorism and the terrorist religion of pieces, islam, continues in PA. There's a public meeting to be held this Saturday in Somerset, PA. If you can make it, you might want to attend to see how we're going to celebrate and honor terrorists on the taxpayer dime. For extensive details, see
Error Theory.
(H/T to Always on Watch).
Posted by: Ogre at
03:03 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
Government Solution: More Government
Is anyone surprised? The government has determined that Katrina was not actually a natural disaster, but instead the
lack of more and larger government was the reason that people died. Seriously, this 520-page (or is it
600-page) report really says that.
So, let's go to the report, shall we?
Oh wait, we can't! As of the writing of this post, it seems the report hasn't been released! How is it that so many news reports can tell us what's in a report that hasn't been released? So much for that "right to know." I guess the press meant that THEY have a right to know everything and they will determine, in their infinite wisdom, what the public has a right to know.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am back from Iraq Ogre, and it is great to see that your Blog is still in action.
Per your post, I am a Conservative through and through, and I think that President Bush will go down in History as one of our greatest Presidents; however, Chertoff has not been a stellar appointee.
Nonetheless, I think that they energy security could have been addressed in a better manner.
I was in Iraq during the aftermath of Katrina, but my family who still lives in Charlotte told me about the gas shortages there, and the price gouging at the pumps.
I hope that you will keep us abreast of the latest on this report when it is ultimately released.
Posted by: Michael R. Churchill at February 16, 2006 05:51 PM (qzEob)
2
GREAT to hear that you're back! And congrats on joining the NCOs.
Posted by: Ogre at February 17, 2006 12:28 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Utter Smoking Insanity
In the spirit of the Olympic Games, I'm trying very hard this week to not comment on the politics of other countries. But
this one is just so insane that I can't let it go. The article is about the loons on the other side of pond banning smoking in public. But that's not all--
In addition to making it a crime, for which you can be deprived of liberty and property, they also introduced crimes and penalties for failure to obey the initial laws. There's a brand-new fine for NOT posting signs prohibiting smoking -- and that fine is 4 times the no smoking fine. It's not immediately clear exactly how many "No Smoking" signs are required per square foot. It's also not clear that if there's not a sign and you smoke if you've actually broken the law.
Even that's not all! There's ANOTHER fine, FIFTY times the smoking fine penalty for "failing to stop people smoking." Seriously!
So, if you're smoking, there's a small fine. However, if someone walks past you who is NOT smoking, and they don't stop and force YOU to stop smoking, THEY get a more serious fine! Is there anyone who can make ANY sense out of this insanity?
I expect to see public beatings continue -- because if you are there and don't force someone else to stop smoking, you could be heavily fined!
Posted by: Ogre at
12:07 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 238 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why don't they just outright make cigarettes illegal and get it over with.
Posted by: Contagion at February 16, 2006 01:44 PM (Q5WxB)
2
Because then they couldn't collect the HUGE dollars (pounds, euros) in taxes from the sales of them!
Posted by: Ogre at February 16, 2006 01:56 PM (/k+l4)
3
Don't forget politicans love the campaign contributions by "Big Tobacco".
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at February 16, 2006 02:11 PM (5+Jvh)
4
Aye, there's too much money there to outright ban it -- and how'd that go for alcohol?
Posted by: Ogre at February 16, 2006 02:59 PM (/k+l4)
5
Fine, they won't make it illegal, but they sure will tax the hell out of it!
Posted by: contagion at February 16, 2006 05:31 PM (Q5WxB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Greensboro, NC has too much money
Once again, government shows that it's pockets are completely unlimited. The city of Greensboro, NC
just gave over a million dollars -- to professional golf. I guess the professional golf circuit just doesn't have enough money.
Oh, but they'll tell you it was "just in case" the sponsors cannot be found to support the tournament. Apparently the Greensboro council is too insulated from the real world to understand how things work. I've worked on campaigns to obtain sponsors for sporting events before.
Once the "goal" amount of sponsors has been reached, there's not much effort put into obtaining more. Sure, some will be obtained, but you don't try real hard. Well, the city has just ensured that the goal has been met -- so why bother trying to obtain sponsors? They won't.
So, citizens of Greensboro, you have just volunteered to give huge piles of cash to professional sports players. I'm glad you have so much money to waste -- now NO ONE in Greensboro has the right to complain about professional sports salaries -- it's your damn fault.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
February 15, 2006
ToiletGate
Today's top story: Toiletgate.
As first reported here, there is now a full-blown cover up going on in Washington. There is a complete and total news blackout on this serious topic, of which the people have a right to now. The Vice President's press secretary was finally reached for comment:
I. P. Freely, ABC: Mr. Vice President's Press Secretary, we need to know, we have a RIGHT to know -- did the Vice President indeed use the toilet at approximately 6am EST this morning?
Mr. Vice President's Press Secretary: I'm not answering that, you moron.
Anita Man, cBS: Sir, sir, can you please comment on how the Vice President's use of the toilet may be perceived by the French and other countries?
Press Secretary: Where are you people from?
Ben Dover, CAIR: As a representative of muslim terrorists around the world, I need to know what the actual content was of the movement of the Vice President. The terrorist muslim community around the world is certainly offended at this use of the toilet, but we do not know how offended to be without knowing if the Vice President had eaten pork before heading to the toilet.
Press Secretary: Was that even a question, you idiot?
Al Koholic, DNC: So are you confirming now that the Vice President did indeed go, and he went #2? We have a right to know!
Press Secretary: I'm leaving now, you people are actually draining MY intelligence.
Hillary Clinton, taking over the microphone: "A tendency of this administration -- from the top all the way to the bottom -- is to withhold information ... to refuse to be forthcoming about information that is of significance and relevance to the jobs that all of you do, and the interests of the American people."
*** DEVELOPING
Posted by: Ogre at
07:08 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.
1
If anything illustrates the deep divide between right and left in this country, the shooting incident does.
On the Left, bloggers would have you believe that the Vice President was performing a gangland slaying.
The Right would have you think that what the Vice President did was no worse than using a pay toilet.
Vice President Cheney today took full responsibility for the accidental shooting of his friend today.
This is the act of an adult, something we could all do to emulate.
This event is serious. Not attempted murder serious, but serious. A man's life is threatened. We should not be puffing it up, nor putting it down.
My prayers go out, both to the injured man, and to Mr. Cheney, a grown man, who is going to have this hovering over him for at least as long a a certain incident has haunted Senator Kennedy. Or until he dies, whichever comes first.
Posted by: The Small Town Hick at February 15, 2006 09:37 PM (ZINSp)
2
Small Town Hick, I think you missed the point here -- this was making fun of the PRESS, not the shooting incident!
Posted by: Ogre at February 15, 2006 09:38 PM (2IrwV)
3
No, I got it.
And I was referring to the press, as well.
And to the bloggers.
No one is treating this incident as what it is. It is either an impeachable offense (left) or a bit of fluff (right).
It is not an impeachable offense to accidentally shoot a man. Even if you are the Vice President.
It is not going overboard, however, to mention on the news that the Vice President of the United States has shot somebody. It's the price of fame.
Posted by: The Small Town Hick at February 16, 2006 02:41 AM (ZINSp)
4
It's fair to say the President himself would have handled this incident a heckuvalot better than the Veep did, and that is probably what has the MSM up in arms; well part of what does.
The President would have called an immediate press release, as he did 11 years ago when he was involved in his own hunting accident. It wasn't nearly as serious as the one Cheney was involved in obviously, where a man's life hangs in the balance, but it was definitely an uncomfortable situation to say the least.
It demonstrates a vast gap in integrity between the Veep and his boss.
That said, I shall now go fetch a beer from my fridge ;-)
Blog ON y'all...
Posted by: Gun Toting Liberal at February 16, 2006 04:14 AM (OKBoD)
5
Hick, there's a specific reason I didn't mention the hunting incident AT ALL -- because I am NOT making light of the accident! I'm not commenting AT ALL on the shooting.
I am commenting on the incredible self-centeredness of the press. I am commenting on the press' incessent complaining that they are not immediately informed of every single thing that THEY want to know about.
This has nothing to do with the hunting incident, and everything to do with how much the press thinks EVERYONE owes them EVERYTHING.
Posted by: Ogre at February 16, 2006 10:40 AM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Vice Presidential Toilet Update
*** UPDATE ***
The news reported earlier that the Vice President did indeed go to the bathroom at approximately 6:00am EST has been confirmed by anonymous sources. Witnesses have come forward to confirm that the Vice President was spotted headed into the bathroom just before 6:00 am EST.
ABC News has sent an investigative correspondent into the sewer system to search for additional evidence of this cover up by the Office of the Vice President. There still has been no announcement by the Vice President's Office regarding any scheduled press conferences.
This is very frustrating for the various new agencies covering the White House. One cBS news reporter, Tim Jones was blocked from entering the bathroom at the Vice President's residence. Jones cried out that the secret service agents were blocking his rightful access to information, but they refused to let him enter. Jones said that he was planning on filing a freedom of information act request.
The ACLU has not weighed in yet, nor have the muslims.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 176 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I have it from informed sources that the Vice President washed incriminating evidence from his hands and used a blow dryer rather than paper towels so that no finger prints could be recovered from the trash bin.
Posted by: TF Stern at February 15, 2006 09:15 PM (dz3wA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Breaking News: Cheney Uses Toilet
I have just been informed, via press release from the Office of the Vice President and his press secretary that the Vice President of the United States has just gone to the bathroom.
*** EXCLUSIVE ***
It appears that the Vice President actually went to the bathroom 2 hours ago. We will send our investigative team to discover why there was such a delay in the reporting. The public has a "right to know" why, when, and where the Vice President goes to the bathroom. Investigations continue into the names and identities of the plumbers who installed the toilet and the companies involved with the waste removal.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., urged Cheney to hold a press conference, which he has not done since 2002. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused the administration of being the most secretive in "modern history."
Cheney's office said that it had only been informed in the last 5 minutes of the Vice President's use of the toilet and that they had no knowledge of him using the toilet before this time. Democrat officials in North Carolina are investigating if any laws were broken while the Vice President was using the toilet.
*** DEVELOPING ***
Posted by: Ogre at
01:06 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
1
hehe
You know... it ISN'T like Cheney swam outta the water and went back to his room for the night.
He did actually get help for the guy.
Posted by: Kari at February 15, 2006 03:19 PM (Q2cJ0)
2
So you think that SHOOTING a man and going to a bathroom are events of equal importance?
Posted by: br23net at February 15, 2006 03:41 PM (0R1eS)
3
Kari -- that always seems to come up, doesn't it?
And Br23 -- in this case, not quite -- the toilet issue is MUCH more important.
You see, the shooting was an accident that happened between two private people on private property. The toilet events actually occur on public property, so more should actually be known about them!
Posted by: Ogre at February 15, 2006 03:58 PM (/k+l4)
4
Ogre - Now you're just being mean :-)
Posted by: Harvey at February 16, 2006 03:28 AM (ubhj8)
5
But Harvey, the people have the right to know (any damn thing the press wants to know)!
Posted by: Ogre at February 16, 2006 10:55 AM (2IrwV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Coalition" wants less freedom
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
NC Constitution:
Sec. 14. Freedom of speech and press.
Freedom of speech and of the press are two of the great bulwarks of liberty and therefore shall never be restrained, but every person shall be held responsible for their abuse.
There were various reasons that these laws were put in place. One of the basic, primary reasons, was to allow freedom of speech. As the courts have (correctly) ruled repeatedly, money IS speech. Any limitation on money, especially in politics, IS a limit on freedom of speech -- and that's wrong.
A "coalition" of groups in NC wants to limit free speech by limiting what people can give to legislators. That's wrong. There's absolutely no reason to limit it. When you stop what people can give to government, you stop freedom, plain and simple.
So yes, I completely support removing every single limit on any political race -- with one condition. If Bill Gates wants to buy a Senator, I have no problem with that. If one person wants to donate $1,000,000.00 to a candidate for county commissioner, that's fine with me. There should be no limits -- except one.
Each candidate should be required to report, within 24 hours, the source of any donations on the internet. So if you're bought and paid for, everyone will know it immediately. And then the complex, myriad confusing rules could ALL go away and we could stop wasting so much time talking about it and trying to prosecute it.
If I want to give money to someone who will reduce my taxes, why should anyone be opposed to that? So no, don't limit anyone. Just report it.
And if you truly do want to limit it, reduce government spending and regulations -- if there's no reason to buy favors, the spending will go down by itself.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
84kb generated in CPU 0.0251, elapsed 0.1107 seconds.
100 queries taking 0.0945 seconds, 289 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.