When is the last time you heard a judge recuse himself from a case in which they had a clear, vested, conflict of interest? It happens all the time -- a judge cannot rule on a case where, for example, their own son is being sentenced. They would clearly not be able to be impartial in their decision. It's one of the reasons many higher courts have a number of different judges -- so that one can recuse themselves and judgment can still be rendered.

Of course, this idea is foreign to the left. The left, the ACLU, are all about advancing socialism and communism at all costs, in all cases. The ACLU has even permeated the highest court in the land, making a mockery of justice and the American Way. This penetration is, of course, Ruth Ginsberg.

She decided that she could rule on a case involving the ACLU -- an organization that she used to work for and very strongly support. In a republican form of government with actual checks and balances, she'd be removed from her position immediately for malfeasance. But America doesn't have a representative republic any more. And for that, the ACLU is glad.

Posted by: Ogre at 03:05 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 1 kb.