ACLU Hates Freedom

This week the Stop the ACLU Blogburst has a couple of topics. Some of the blogburst members will be mentioning the unbelievable support for murderous child molesters (aka terrorists), while others will be blogging about Supreme Court nominees. I have chosen the latter topic, as it is an area I research a lot.

The ACLU is already complaining about President George W. Bush's pick for supreme court justice, and he hasn't even made a choice. He hasn't even leaked a list of names for them to attack, and they are already complaining. Unfortunately, this is likely having it's desired effect -- many good and qualified jurists are likely to refuse the nomination simply because they do not want to be vilified by the ACLU, Democrats, and Socialists.

Their press release of July 1, 2005 needs a little interpretation, so I'll have a go at it in the extended post:
All items in blockquotes are from the American Communist Liar's Union (ACLU) press release.

The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed great concern that the Bush administration will replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Interpretation: AHHHHH! HOLY CRAP! Bush gets to appoint a judge! AHHHHH! What are we going to do!

Justice O'Connor fully earned her reputation as a centrist

Interpretation: Justice O'Connor agreed with us and our ideas advancing communism and destroying freedom quite often.

[Justice O'Connor] stood up for individual rights and against a radically conservative vision of the Constitution

Interpretation: Justice O'Connor supported everything anti-Christian we could find to bring to her. She also hated the United States Constitution as it was written, and found many ways to help us destroy it's meaning as often as possible.

We are gravely concerned that President Bush will use this opportunity to nominate someone whose judicial philosophy is hostile to civil liberties.

Interpretation: We are terrified and we have wet our pants because Bush might use this opportunity to appoint a judge who has actually read the United States Constitution and might actually, at least once in awhile, do his job as a judge and not make crap up like O'Connor did for us.

The ACLU is preparing to hold a board meeting in the coming weeks to decide whether to oppose the Bush administration's nominee.

Interpretation: Look, no matter who he picks, we've got to have a united front to try and destroy them. We've got to plan our ad campaigns, scare the you-know-what out of people so they'll give us money, and we can start production of the commercials full of lies -- we'll insert the name of the actual nominee to be destroyed later.

As a matter of policy, the ACLU will only oppose nominees to the Supreme Court that are fundamentally hostile to civil liberties and will do so upon a vote of the board of directors.

Interpretation: Anyone Bush nominates, with NO exception, will be opposed.

[Justice O'Connor] wrote the opinion upholding equal opportunity programs and the importance of diversity in college admissions.

Interpretation: Justice O'Connor was wonderful and we loved her because she helped us find ways to divide the American people in groups. The more we can divide the people, the better our chances of ridding this country of this horrible notion of freedom, one of our primary goals.

And in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, she broke with Chief Justice Rehnquist and other opponents of a woman's right to choose by joining the majority in reaffirming Roe v. Wade.

Interpretation: She supports us and our goals of killing as many undesirables as we can find in our society. We will likely nominate her for our Rudolf Höss award for bravery and nationalism.

Looking forward, the ACLU noted that O'Connor's replacement could directly affect the outcome of some of the most divisive legal questions facing America today history. The nominee could, for instance, reverse the court's growing discomfort with the death penalty;

Interpretation: President George W. Bush might actually appoint a judge who believes that states actually have the right to determine criminal penalties for their own citizens who break the laws of the state instead of allowing us, through our power in the Supreme Court, to dictate what, where, and when all citizens are allowed to do at all times.

grant the president greater authority to detain Americans without charge,

Interpretation: The new nominee may actually allow the United States to win the war on terror, and we cannot have that. We need the war on terror to be lost by the United States so we, the ACLU, in the form of communism, can raise America from it's ashes, much like Hilter did with Germany after WWI.

"The nomination battle for O'Connor's replacement comes at a critical moment for civil liberties," said ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero. "The stakes could be as high as they were during the Bork nomination battle of the 1980's."

Interpretation: We are really going to pull out all the stops, just like with Bork -- we will stop at nothing, tell lies by the bazillions, to attempt to stop any appointment of any judge by Bush. We think that if we can organize enough opposition and tell enough lies, we will be able to get our Democrat/Socialist buddies in the Senate (including McCain, and his NorthEastern RINO pals) to keep the filibuster going until we can get our own man in the White House.

Folks, the ACLU really is full of anti-Americans. If you give them money, you are directly supporting the destruction of freedom in America. Freedom in America is already scarce, please do not help it's demise. Read more at the Stop the ACLU site, or even join the weekly blogburst trying to expose this group for what it really is.

Posted by: Ogre at 01:49 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 956 words, total size 6 kb.