October 20, 2005
This week, the ACLU decides to support voter fraud, and they win, finding a federal judge who also believes in voter fraud, opposing the people of the state and the legislature of the state. The ACLU wants to continue to allow voter fraud so they can change the will of the people and valid elections. Their problem, this time, is in regards to a law passed by the elected representatives of the Georgia Legislature and signed into law by the governor. The law would have required voters to actually provide some evidence of identification before people were allowed to vote.
This sort of law might help a little in ensuring that people could only vote once and that dead people would not be permitted to vote. The people could use a driver's license, or, if they didn't have a license, the state would provide them with a FREE identification card.
In case you missed that last part, realize that the state was completely willing to provide free identification. There would be zero cost to any person who wanted one of these state id cards. They would only be needed by those few people who did not have driver's licenses. And the state would provide them for free. The people who wanted an ID would pay zero dollars for the id.
That's not good enough for the ACLU. The ACLU complains that
African Americans also are nearly six times more likely than whites in Georgia to live below the poverty line.
You see, that's completely irrelevant in this situation. The identifications cards are free. No matter how little money one has in Georgia, they can get an id cards -- and they're only needed if a person doesn't already have a driver's license.
The ACLU continues with their complaint:
Sixty years ago, Georgia's all-white legislature abolished the poll tax, thereby preventing any Georgia citizen from being charged money to vote. This new law turns back the clock and violates that principle
It's not that they don't understand that the identification cards are free, it's that they don't care. This shows that the ACLU only sees in color and will quite literally argue anything to keep up their own voter fraud activities. They're not stupid, they're honestly lying for their own purposes.
They also claim it:
Violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it treats voters unequally
No. Not at all. It actually treats ALL voters quite exactly the same way. Total B.S. on that complaint.
Violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act because it results in the denial of voting rights to African-American and Latino voters.
Again, the complaint about people who supposedly cannot afford FREE id cards. Lies -- completely untrue.
Violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act because it applies different standards for voters who vote in person compared to those who vote by absentee ballot and disqualifies voters based solely on whether they have a government-issued photo ID, even if they are personally known to election officials, or their signatures match the one on their official voter registration card
Did you see the way that last part was worded? According the ACLU, if someone who is working at the polls, even if that person works for the ACLU, claims that they "know" someone should be allowed to vote, then that person should be allowed to vote, even if they are not who they say they are.
In this case the ACLU clearly shows it strong bias AGAINST free and fair elections. The ACLU clearly wants to continue fraudulent elections so they they can continue their own fraud.
Even worse? The ACLU managed to find a federal judge who agreed with them.
I'm not really sure why it took 123 pages to make that sort of decision, but that's what the judge did. The actual lawsuit lists common cause -- a very liberal and freedom-hating group -- as a primary sponsor of the lawsuit.
Other "plaintiffs" include: League of Women Voters, Central Presbyterian Outreach, GA Association of Black Officials, NAACP, GA legislative Black Caucus, and the Concerned Black Clergy of Atlanta. All of these groups are now on the record as supporting voter fraud, so any complaints from them regarding voter fraud in the future should fall on deaf ears.
The judge, either a moron or an intentional liberal who also supports voter fraud, claims that
the photo ID requirement constitutes a poll tax
The judge is either intentionally ignoring the concept that the id cards a provided FREE, or he just doesn't like accountability in elections. Having to carry this free id card also
unduly burdens the right to vote
according to this judge. Ok, following that logic, anything you do that requires you to carry some sort of id is a burden. If you are required to show your driver's license to the police officer that pulls you over, isn't that also an "undue burden?"
What about showing id when cashing a check? Isn't that an "undue burden" then, too? This clearly means that airports have absolutely no right to ask you to show ID before you get on a plane -- it's an "undue burden" according to judge Harold Murphy.
Moron Murphy also complains that asking people to show a *FREE* id card when voting
has the likely effect of causing many of those voters to forego voting or of precluding those voters from voting at the polls.
How's that? Supposedly these people all manage to make their way to the polls when voting day comes (assuming they're not allowing someone else to vote for them -- that would be fraud), but if they're asked to carry their FREE id card with them, it's too much of a burden?
Or maybe Moron Murphy has decided that it's too much of a burden for these people to GET those ids cards. Well in that case, I'm wondering how these people managed to actually register to vote? It would take the same amount of effort to register to vote as it would to obtain a FREE photo id card.
Apparently, in Judge Murphy's world, these people shouldn't even be required to register to vote, because that would also be an "undue burden."
This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with continuing voter fraud. If the Democrats were so interested in preventing fraud, they'd support this law 100%. However, they don't, because they're not.
The only hope is that this is only a preliminary injunction and saner heads will rule when the case actually goes to a court. To claim that this is an "undue burden" on anyone is an outright lie. Judge Murphy should be fired for allowing this lawsuit to continue instead of dismissing it outright.
The Unrepentant Individual has blogged this, too.
____________________
And now, for the good news about our movement (Stop the ACLU)!!! I put this last because it will be later in the night, but our own Nedd Kareiva of Stop The ACLU.Org will be on WRWL Radio with Pastor Ernie Sanders to discuss the ACLU and our plans to cripple them. Pastor Sanders has the longest running radio show in Ohio (28 years per his site), has been in court with the ACLU over 20 times and not paid one dime to them. He fiercely opposes the ACLU's agenda and he is looking forward to speaking with him. He will be taking your calls so let's show Ohio and America we mean business against the ACLU. He will be on as long as they wish. He will mention the blog, so everyone try to call in and talk to Nedd.
TOLL FREE ACROSS AMERICA: (88
677-9673, LOCAL: (216) 901-0933
LISTEN: Via Crusader Radio live Internet feed or WRWL stations at its home page.
This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please register at Our Portal, or email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 115 blogs already onboard.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:01 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1382 words, total size 9 kb.
Posted by: vw bug at October 20, 2005 01:10 PM (flzGe)
Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 01:18 PM (/k+l4)
Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 09:17 PM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 09:18 PM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 09:21 PM (iJFc9)
Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 11:28 PM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 05:34 AM (iJFc9)
Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 07:53 AM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 07:59 AM (/k+l4)
Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 09:01 AM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 10:12 AM (/k+l4)
Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 03:34 PM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 03:54 PM (/k+l4)
88 queries taking 0.1106 seconds, 202 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.