October 20, 2005

ACLU Supports Voter Fraud

Time for the weekly Stop the ACLU Blogburst. The weekly blogburst is to point out the true goals of the ACLU and help to point out to the general public where and when the ACLU opposes freedom, as they quite often do.

This week, the ACLU decides to support voter fraud, and they win, finding a federal judge who also believes in voter fraud, opposing the people of the state and the legislature of the state. The ACLU wants to continue to allow voter fraud so they can change the will of the people and valid elections. Their problem, this time, is in regards to a law passed by the elected representatives of the Georgia Legislature and signed into law by the governor. The law would have required voters to actually provide some evidence of identification before people were allowed to vote.

This sort of law might help a little in ensuring that people could only vote once and that dead people would not be permitted to vote. The people could use a driver's license, or, if they didn't have a license, the state would provide them with a FREE identification card.

In case you missed that last part, realize that the state was completely willing to provide free identification. There would be zero cost to any person who wanted one of these state id cards. They would only be needed by those few people who did not have driver's licenses. And the state would provide them for free. The people who wanted an ID would pay zero dollars for the id.

That's not good enough for the ACLU. The ACLU complains that

African Americans also are nearly six times more likely than whites in Georgia to live below the poverty line.

You see, that's completely irrelevant in this situation. The identifications cards are free. No matter how little money one has in Georgia, they can get an id cards -- and they're only needed if a person doesn't already have a driver's license.

The ACLU continues with their complaint:

Sixty years ago, Georgia's all-white legislature abolished the poll tax, thereby preventing any Georgia citizen from being charged money to vote. This new law turns back the clock and violates that principle

It's not that they don't understand that the identification cards are free, it's that they don't care. This shows that the ACLU only sees in color and will quite literally argue anything to keep up their own voter fraud activities. They're not stupid, they're honestly lying for their own purposes.

They also claim it:

Violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it treats voters unequally

No. Not at all. It actually treats ALL voters quite exactly the same way. Total B.S. on that complaint.
Violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act because it results in the denial of voting rights to African-American and Latino voters.

Again, the complaint about people who supposedly cannot afford FREE id cards. Lies -- completely untrue.
Violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act because it applies different standards for voters who vote in person compared to those who vote by absentee ballot and disqualifies voters based solely on whether they have a government-issued photo ID, even if they are personally known to election officials, or their signatures match the one on their official voter registration card

Did you see the way that last part was worded? According the ACLU, if someone who is working at the polls, even if that person works for the ACLU, claims that they "know" someone should be allowed to vote, then that person should be allowed to vote, even if they are not who they say they are.

In this case the ACLU clearly shows it strong bias AGAINST free and fair elections. The ACLU clearly wants to continue fraudulent elections so they they can continue their own fraud.

Even worse? The ACLU managed to find a federal judge who agreed with them.

I'm not really sure why it took 123 pages to make that sort of decision, but that's what the judge did. The actual lawsuit lists common cause -- a very liberal and freedom-hating group -- as a primary sponsor of the lawsuit.

Other "plaintiffs" include: League of Women Voters, Central Presbyterian Outreach, GA Association of Black Officials, NAACP, GA legislative Black Caucus, and the Concerned Black Clergy of Atlanta. All of these groups are now on the record as supporting voter fraud, so any complaints from them regarding voter fraud in the future should fall on deaf ears.

The judge, either a moron or an intentional liberal who also supports voter fraud, claims that

the photo ID requirement constitutes a poll tax

The judge is either intentionally ignoring the concept that the id cards a provided FREE, or he just doesn't like accountability in elections. Having to carry this free id card also
unduly burdens the right to vote

according to this judge. Ok, following that logic, anything you do that requires you to carry some sort of id is a burden. If you are required to show your driver's license to the police officer that pulls you over, isn't that also an "undue burden?"

What about showing id when cashing a check? Isn't that an "undue burden" then, too? This clearly means that airports have absolutely no right to ask you to show ID before you get on a plane -- it's an "undue burden" according to judge Harold Murphy.

Moron Murphy also complains that asking people to show a *FREE* id card when voting

has the likely effect of causing many of those voters to forego voting or of precluding those voters from voting at the polls.

How's that? Supposedly these people all manage to make their way to the polls when voting day comes (assuming they're not allowing someone else to vote for them -- that would be fraud), but if they're asked to carry their FREE id card with them, it's too much of a burden?

Or maybe Moron Murphy has decided that it's too much of a burden for these people to GET those ids cards. Well in that case, I'm wondering how these people managed to actually register to vote? It would take the same amount of effort to register to vote as it would to obtain a FREE photo id card.

Apparently, in Judge Murphy's world, these people shouldn't even be required to register to vote, because that would also be an "undue burden."

This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with continuing voter fraud. If the Democrats were so interested in preventing fraud, they'd support this law 100%. However, they don't, because they're not.

The only hope is that this is only a preliminary injunction and saner heads will rule when the case actually goes to a court. To claim that this is an "undue burden" on anyone is an outright lie. Judge Murphy should be fired for allowing this lawsuit to continue instead of dismissing it outright.

The Unrepentant Individual has blogged this, too.

____________________

And now, for the good news about our movement (Stop the ACLU)!!! I put this last because it will be later in the night, but our own Nedd Kareiva of Stop The ACLU.Org will be on WRWL Radio with Pastor Ernie Sanders to discuss the ACLU and our plans to cripple them. Pastor Sanders has the longest running radio show in Ohio (28 years per his site), has been in court with the ACLU over 20 times and not paid one dime to them. He fiercely opposes the ACLU's agenda and he is looking forward to speaking with him. He will be taking your calls so let's show Ohio and America we mean business against the ACLU. He will be on as long as they wish. He will mention the blog, so everyone try to call in and talk to Nedd.

TOLL FREE ACROSS AMERICA: (88 677-9673, LOCAL: (216) 901-0933
LISTEN: Via Crusader Radio live Internet feed or WRWL stations at its home page.

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please register at Our Portal, or email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 115 blogs already onboard.

Posted by: Ogre at 11:01 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 1382 words, total size 9 kb.

1 Reading what you just wrote gives me a headache. This is why I stayed out of politics. I would be in jail for murder by now.

Posted by: vw bug at October 20, 2005 01:10 PM (flzGe)

2 And I hate when people say things like, "That's the way the game is played." It's not supposed to be a game -- this is real.

Posted by: Ogre at October 20, 2005 01:18 PM (/k+l4)

3 OK it isn't the same as a poll tax but if you want this law, and I do, you have to be willing to do certain things. You have to be willing to open offices of places that provide State issued photo ID's in poor neighborhoods as people with less money are less likely to have cars to transport them to these offices. Also you are going to have to offer these ID's free of charge to people who can't afford them. You are also going to have to keep these offices open some nights and weekends because lots of people--particularly the working poor--can't afford to take time off to do this. If you do these things and make it fair your law will pass and not be considered discriminatory or anything like a poll tax. Chris

Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 09:17 PM (M7kiy)

4 Your site won't accept my url it says it is questionable content. twob-a-b-e-sandabrain.typepad.com

Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 09:18 PM (M7kiy)

5 Sorry it didn't take you site -- the spam filter catches b-abes* because of the massive amount of porn spamming that comes in looking like that. But yet, the IDs ARE FREE! If you cannot afford them, THEY ARE FREE. And the offices don't need to stay open any longer -- these people managed to get registered to vote, didn't they? If they can get registered to vote, they can get their IDs at the same time.

Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 09:21 PM (iJFc9)

6 Well, um yeah they did manage to register to vote, but most places you can do that by filling out a form and mailing it in or you can fill out the form at the supermarket when they have a voter registration drive or when someone knocks on your door for a party or a candidate and asks you if you want to register to vote--so unless you plan to issue ID cards through the mail, which would seem to defeat the purpose of your law, you are going to have to keep the offices open some evenings and some weekends

Posted by: Chris at October 24, 2005 11:28 PM (M7kiy)

7 I still just don't understand the opposition to this law. Well, that's not quite right, I do understand the opposition -- the ACLU and Democrats honestly want to continue fraudulent voting.

Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 05:34 AM (iJFc9)

8 The opposition to the law is as I explained it. It gives an unfair advantage to those with cars, and jobs they can afford to take time off from or people who don't have to work and people who don't have the money to pay for a photo id. What is your objection to my suggestions? Or are you really trying to supress the vote of the poor.If all you want to do is insure that people who vote are who they say they are and that they are allowed to vote then there should be no objection to the things that would make it a fair law.

Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 07:53 AM (M7kiy)

9 The primary opposition to the law is that the poor cannot afford IDs. That's a total fabrication because the damn IDs are free. Your argument is bordering on insanity now -- requiring IDs gives advantages to people who have jobs because those who have jobs can take time AWAY from their job to get IDs while those who have NO jobs don't have TIME to get an ID? So what are these poor, jobless people doing all day that they don't have TIME to stop by and get an ID? And again, if they have time to REGISTER TO VOTE, how is it that they don't have time to get an ID? You apparently have completely bought into the ACLU and NAACP support of continuing fraudulent voting when you keep saying that the poor cannot afford something that's FREE! THE ID CARD IS FREE. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY ANY MONEY FOR IT. IF YOU ARE POOR, THEY WILL NOT ASK YOU FOR MONEY BECAUSE THE ID IS FREE.

Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 07:59 AM (/k+l4)

10 Slow down...go back...read. I said the working poor, dear. Slow down...go back...read. You can register to vote by mail. Not sure where you live, but the State ID card here is NOT FREE! Again, what are your objections to keeping the office open longer on some days and on weekends and putting them in locations that are easily accesible by those with out cars?

Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 09:01 AM (M7kiy)

11 "Working poor." Define. At exactly what dollar level does one become "working poor?" Does that count for teenagers working? What about unskilled workers? What about drug dealers who have no IRS wages? I don't accept "working poor" as a valid description of people. I'm not sure why you're not getting the "free" part. FoxNews: "The governor said such cards would be given free to those who cannot afford the fee." Washington Times: "[id] such cards would be given to those who cannot afford the fee." USA Today: "The governor said such cards would be given free to those who cannot afford the fee." Neal Boortz: " For voters without driver's licenses, the state was going to issue free picture IDs. Free .. that means no cost." And if that's not enough, refer to Georgia Public Law 40-5-103 (a): "The department shall not be authorized to collect a fee for an identification card from any person who swears under oath that he or she is indigent and cannot pay the free for an identification card, that he or she desires an identification card in order to vote in a primary or election in Georgia" The damn thing IS free! My objection is to giving special privileges to people without merit.

Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 10:12 AM (/k+l4)

12 You still haven't answered the question--how is insuring equal access to the id cards special treatment. I'm not arguing with you anymore you obviously don't have a coherent answer.

Posted by: Chris at October 26, 2005 03:34 PM (M7kiy)

13 It's not equal access. The way you have defined it, it's only fair if each and every person has a voting place within 100 feet of their front door. There is no unequal distribution of facilities. By placing more facilities in some areas, that is special treatment. That is unequal.

Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 03:54 PM (/k+l4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
30kb generated in CPU 0.0182, elapsed 0.1203 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1106 seconds, 202 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.