March 01, 2007

Billions in Free Cash for Criminals

Apparently California continues unabated on it's path towards total socialism. They are now proposing that taxpayers give away billions of dollars to anyone who has the good luck of being born inside the state's borders.

I'm betting if this passes, there will be a surge in babies born at hospitals at or near the borders of the state (in all directions). Of course, there's absolutely NO residence requirements for this massive giveaway.

They're claming the bill will "increase savings." Well, DUH. It will increase savings because the state will be forcing taxpayers to save money FOR OTHER PEOPLE, whether they want to or not. No, it won't increase responsibility one bit -- in fact, it will DECREASE responsibility -- which is a hallmark of today's liberalism/socialist Democrat Party.

People should save money. Of that, there's no question. You should save money for your "retirement," you should save money to pay for sudden, unexpected expenses, and you should save money if you have planned expenses in the future. A responsible person will save money for just such reasons. If a person does NOT save money, they should be held just as responsible -- by not allowing them to have a retirement, or nice things they want (like a college education). Whether government should be involved with savings is questionable. Perhaps they could encourage it -- at the very least, they shouldn't punish it (as they do now).

This bill, however, does the exact opposite. This bill encourages people NOT to save because the government will take care of them! Why save for retirement when the government will give you free medical benefits and free retirement cash? Why save for college education when government wants to make it free for you? With this bill, everyone gets a free college education (paid for by taxpayers, of course). Why save for large, unexpected medical expenses when the government ensures you will get all the free medicine you want?

This bill does one thing, and one thing only -- and this is the absolute intent of those who introduced the bill: it makes people MORE dependent on government. It's a hand out, no matter how many times they lie and claim it's a "hand up." It's total socialism and it's completely and totally wrong in any sort of a free country -- which California is clearly not.

Posted by: Ogre at 02:17 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 404 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Actually, there are a lot of holes in that bill, the main one being, what happens when these illegals take the money and run back to the country of origin? Of course the state can't do without so more taxes will be raised to offset the abuse of the system.

Posted by: Steph at March 01, 2007 04:21 PM (AC9Dc)

2 Correct. There's no requirements that you have to spend the money the state gives you in that state at all. I wonder how many people from NV will have their kids in a CA hospital now.

Posted by: Ogre at March 01, 2007 08:22 PM (oifEm)

3 Take from my savings (via taxes) and give it to the babies. THAT is socialism. NO THANKS.

Posted by: Raven at March 01, 2007 11:37 PM (3fBzu)

4 And that's what socialists WANT.

Posted by: Ogre at March 02, 2007 02:13 AM (kft0e)

5 best site! thanks! qisdg.

Posted by: cdmwuuwihv at October 12, 2007 04:43 PM (15mtI)

6 best site! thanks! sdz.

Posted by: etjedmfibt at October 12, 2007 10:06 PM (UEVl9)

7 The most notable decline was among hotel properties. "As a percentage of the delinquent loan population, hotels fell to 5.4% of the total in October from 13.6% in September," said Director Michelle Bayard. The decline in hotel delinquency was driven primarily by the resolution of a large hotel in New Orleans, as the hotel's $83.3 million loan was assumed and brought current, though it has yet to be transferred back to the master servicer. Fitch analyzed delinquency by vintage for all sectors, and found that 1998 and 1999 securitizations accounted for 33.2% of all delinquencies as of October, though the vintages accounted for only 10.8% of Fitch rated transactions. Furthermore, as a percent of the 1998 and 1999 vintage universe, the October 2007 delinquencies account for 0.86%, significantly higher than...
http://site-with-content.com/

Posted by: mlndqkvwtd at November 24, 2007 03:10 PM (YY3H+)

Posted by: jxhrbullbn at January 23, 2008 03:01 PM (NfqGA)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.0135, elapsed 0.1361 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1283 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.