On the political agenda for the Charlotte Observer for 2006: removal of freedom, total prohibition.

Seriously, consider that for a moment before you read another word in the Charlotte Observer. We are told over and over again that there is no media bias. We're told that news reports are unbiased reporting of facts. We're told they have no agenda. Here the Observer clearly admits that they DO have an agenda -- and it's horribly anti-freedom.

The Observer is happy those those in traffic accidents are not drinking. Note they make NO mention of how many people are dying in traffic accidents -- it doesn't matter to them if there are more deaths in traffic accidents, only that there are no people drinking who are in accidents (whether it is their fault or not, also has no bearing on the Observer).

At the very start, the Observer admits that their goal is no drinking.

In addition, they want more traffic checkpoints where you can be searched without a warrant. They want to confiscate personal property of those who have a beer. Yes, if you have one beer and blow higher than the Observer's suggested "lower than 0.08" BAC, you should have your car confiscated -- not temporarily, but stolen from you completely -- for ONE beer.

The Observer viscerally HATES freedom and everything that goes with it. Alcohol is just one part of freedom that the Observer hates, private property is another. Keep that in mind if you find yourself reading the "unbiased" Charlotte Observer.

Posted by: Ogre at 10:02 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.