October 17, 2005

Charlotte Observer hates Democracy

The Charlotte Observer still believes that there are people out there who think that you can actually get some news from that newspaper -- worse, I'm sure there's some people who actually DO believe that they print news! Instead, the Observer is a complete opinion piece -- just as this blog is -- but the difference is that I admit I have a bias, while the Observer does not.

In this hit piece, sold as news, the Observer starts out with this subtext:

Tougher rules still allow for fundraisers when General Assembly is out of session

So the Observer, in a "news" story, is complaining that it is a bad thing that elected officials can raise money when they're not in session. Since the Observer already stands firm with the opinion that they shouldn't raise money when in session, this means that the Observer simply does not like politicians raising money.

That is quite consistent with the Observer's position: you are stupid. The editorial staff at the Observer think that you are too stupid to elect people to represent you and that you should just let them pick for you -- as they try to do every year with their "endorsements." And you shouldn't be able to give any of your money to people running for office -- without checking with the Observer first.

Then again, when I see all the people that vote for "school bonds" when the school board is not accountable for their horrible system, and then people complain about the tax rate (news flash: BONDS COST MONEY), maybe people are too stupid to elect good leaders. Then again, it could be that there's no good people to pick from come election time.

Posted by: Ogre at 08:41 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 294 words, total size 2 kb.

1 So, Ogre, will we see you running for office in NC any time soon?

Posted by: Smokey at October 17, 2005 02:46 PM (68YeG)

2 I'm checking the waters now for a run for the NC House next year. I still debate often. I can no longer run as a Libertarian, as they're outlawed in North Carolina. Write-ins are even more impractical. So the only real option for me is to run as a Republican (I don't think I can fake being a Democrat). Now, if I run as a Republican, I could win the local seat -- but I'm almost assured of being in the minority. In addition, when I tell those people I won't trade votes for cash, the leaders (D) will hate me and ensure anything I try to do (bills, etc.) will be immediately crushed. Then for the next election, some moderate and/or some Democrats can run against me claiming I was "ineffective." And I know I won't get anything good done in such a minority. So, I don't know. And I'm still strongly considering a move to New Hampshire, where I might be a little more free...

Posted by: Ogre at October 17, 2005 03:07 PM (/k+l4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0264, elapsed 0.102 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.0926 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.