October 17, 2005
In this hit piece, sold as news, the Observer starts out with this subtext:
Tougher rules still allow for fundraisers when General Assembly is out of session
So the Observer, in a "news" story, is complaining that it is a bad thing that elected officials can raise money when they're not in session. Since the Observer already stands firm with the opinion that they shouldn't raise money when in session, this means that the Observer simply does not like politicians raising money.
That is quite consistent with the Observer's position: you are stupid. The editorial staff at the Observer think that you are too stupid to elect people to represent you and that you should just let them pick for you -- as they try to do every year with their "endorsements." And you shouldn't be able to give any of your money to people running for office -- without checking with the Observer first.
Then again, when I see all the people that vote for "school bonds" when the school board is not accountable for their horrible system, and then people complain about the tax rate (news flash: BONDS COST MONEY), maybe people are too stupid to elect good leaders. Then again, it could be that there's no good people to pick from come election time.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 294 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Smokey at October 17, 2005 02:46 PM (68YeG)
Posted by: Ogre at October 17, 2005 03:07 PM (/k+l4)
88 queries taking 0.0926 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.