October 31, 2007

Fair and Balanced?

This is, reportedly, Fox News setting up a camera shoot covering a Republican conference:

Just can't let those darn Ron Paul supporters be seen. He's got dangerous ideas, so the mainstream media, even Fox News, apparently, simply cannot let people know about him.

Posted by: Ogre at 03:04 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Two comments. Ron Paul is not a Republican, he is an anarchist preparing the way for the Communists. Second, no one should forget that most of the employees for FOX are news people (i.e. liberals). The employees at FOX donated almost four time as much money to John Kerry as they did to George Bush.

Posted by: burt at October 31, 2007 05:26 PM (Aot0m)

2 Communist? Wow. I don't think you've read anything about any of Ron Paul's positions. I'm pretty sure that there's not one single communist idea that he would support or has ever voted for. As for who is a Republican, I guess that depends on what you think Republicans stand for. If you think Republicans are conservatives, then Paul is a Republican. If you think Republicans are represented by Bush and the recent Congressional majorities then indeed, Paul is not a Republican. Nor would I be -- because unlike them, I honestly like freedom.

Posted by: Ogre at October 31, 2007 06:29 PM (oifEm)

3 What planet are you from??? I'm going to LGF

Posted by: burt at November 04, 2007 01:22 PM (Aot0m)

4 Was there any part of my statement that you found incorrect?

Posted by: Ogre at November 04, 2007 02:56 PM (2WD8n)

5 To be honest, I don't like Ron Pauls stance on the War on Terror. Everything else about keeping the federal government out of our lives and smaller government I agree with. I believe that as far as the War goes, we need to finish what has been started or we will pay dearly. I took the Libertarian test a long time ago and came up 98% Libertarian on my views. But I am also a believer that we need to go at fighting terrorism and Islamofacists with a vengence. Bush has gone at it piecemeal, and he is also selling us down the tubes with Mexico.

Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at November 06, 2007 02:08 AM (TzKlC)

6 I agree with you. The problem, at least this election, is that I don't agree with ANY candidate a whole lot. The only who I appear to agree most of the time with is Paul. Rudy talks tough on the war -- but every single other position he has I disagree with. So while I might disagree with Paul on one issue, I agree with him a WHOLE lot more. And I think Paul, as a Republican, would win BIG in the general election. What are Republicans going to do? Vote for Hillary? I don't think so. And the fringe left will leave Hillary (pro-war) and go with Paul (anti-war). I think he would really win huge if he can win the primary (which is one reason why the media doesn't like him).

Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2007 02:13 AM (2WD8n)

7 I have to wonder to if once he has access to high profile security information if he would change his antiwar view? I guess if he did, he could no doubt be trusted. I do think he is an honest man. I just hear a relative in Virginia who is a huge "Truther" pushing for Ron Paul and it makes me wonder since I think of the as the Moonbat branch of the family! LOL!!!

Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at November 06, 2007 03:04 AM (TzKlC)

8 When truthers support Paul, all I can think of is the extra votes that will be siphoned away from the Democrat candidate...

Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2007 02:16 PM (oifEm)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.0134, elapsed 0.131 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1248 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.