April 17, 2006

Freedom of Association?

I recently received a comment on a post of mine about the John William Pope Civitas Institute. The comment was by someone identifying themselves at "tatertot" with no listed blog or website. The comment is rather disturbing on a couple levels. First, they questioned:

Why tell people to get involved in politics?

Why? Because too many people aren't involved and simply don't understand what is at stake. The current politicians, especially in Raleigh, NC, want to control your life. The vast majority of people want to be left alone, so they do not participate.

Most people would prefer to go about their lives, work hard, earn their money, and take care of their families. However, those who want to take that hard-earned money ARE active in politics. Those who do want to tell you what to do ARE the ones on the left who are protesting and not working, and trying to take things away from you.

So people need to be encouraged to be more active because if we can get a few more people who want to be left alone running government, many more people would actually GET left alone, and freedom would increase greatly.

The second question was much worse:

It's a free country. If people don't want to get involved they shouldn't.

In other words, in this person's view of a "free" country, *I* should NOT be telling people to get involved in politics. In this version of "freedom," the government, apparently, knows all, and everyone else should just shut up. I'm not sure how me simply suggesting people get involved is a reduction of ANYONE'S freedom.

This is the type of "freedom" that exists in Marxist and socialist countries -- you have the right to be free as long as you do what you're told. What sort of freedom exists if people cannot suggest anything? What kind of freedom do you have when you are not supposed to question government?

In this person's view of a "free" country, you should not have the freedom to suggest ideas to anyone. That's not freedom, tatortot, that's totalitarianism.

Posted by: Ogre at 06:01 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 356 words, total size 2 kb.

1 You totally should have ended: "That's not freedom; that's tatortotalitarianism."

Posted by: Lance at April 17, 2006 07:23 PM (HOH5e)

2 LOL!!!!!!

Posted by: Ogre at April 17, 2006 07:25 PM (/k+l4)

3 If everyone felt that they shouldn't get involved then we would have been over taken along time ago and we would be speaking Japanese or German right now.

Posted by: Quality Weenie at April 17, 2006 09:01 PM (BksWB)

4 Those who chose not to get involved are the ones who whine the most, in my experience. When you don't get involved, you shouldn't complain. American's don't understand civic duty; they are lazy so often. Many don't think it's their "place" to get into politics. And many others abuse their "role" in society and become mouthpieces (Michael Moore comes to mind...) That's a profound statement: "Most people would prefer to go about their lives, work hard, earn their money, and take care of their families. However, those who want to take that hard-earned money ARE active in politics. Those who do want to tell you what to do ARE the ones on the left who are protesting and not working, and trying to take things away from you."

Posted by: Raven at April 17, 2006 09:06 PM (/yLa/)

5 It's just true. I really, really do NOT want to be involved in politics. Seriously! There are SO many other things I would like to spend my time doing -- I mean TONS of things. But I know if I sit back and do nothing, then those who want to live off my labor WILL do all they can to take as much of my labor as they can get away with -- and I'm going to be sure as many people as I can reach know about it.

Posted by: Ogre at April 18, 2006 12:37 AM (2eMZT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.0135, elapsed 0.1462 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1392 seconds, 194 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.