September 15, 2005
Now keep in mind, and this is a very important point, that the United States Constitution DOES NOT GRANT rights. It simply lists out powers of the government and certain, specific rights that are protected. So often when someone complains about "finding" a right in the Constitution, I know they don't really understand the Constitution at all. If it's NOT there, it might be a right.
In this particular case, however, the judge obviously has not read the Constitution, or very clearly does not care about it. In case you haven't seen it in it's entirety, I present the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Fist and foremost, can anyone find in there any reference to a local school district? Anyone? Bueller? It's not there. To attempt to apply a very specific definition of a law that very obviously states what CONGRESS cannot do is just plain wrong. I don't care what "precedent" says, they are still completely and totally wrong.
The Constitution does not prevent a local school district, a city, a town, a municipality, a ward, a district, or even an entire STATE from establishing a religion. Yes, I'm serious. Thomas Jefferson agreed with me. If the people of a town want to establish Islam as the town's religion, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO. Only the federal government is prohibited from doing so (unless, of course, a state constitution says otherwise).
If that's not good enough for you, how about other words in the amendment:
... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
If I'm a schoolteacher and I want to say a prayer, how can anyone possibly stop me? How in the world can you say that *I* cannot pray or even utter the word "God?" According to that amendment, if you want to apply it to every government agency, you CANNOT stop me!
Are there any judges left who actually believe the Constitution? Why is this issue so hard to comprehend? And before you ask, yes, if a group of people in one town want to establish their own town religion of Wiccan, I say YES THEY CAN. That's what a representative republic is all about -- people of like mind joining together to do what they like, WITHOUT interference from a federal government that claims to know better.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:38 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 484 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Machelle at September 15, 2005 08:43 AM (ZAyoW)
Posted by: Contagion at September 15, 2005 08:44 AM (/k+l4)
Posted by: Ogre at September 15, 2005 08:48 AM (/k+l4)
88 queries taking 0.0766 seconds, 192 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.