July 24, 2006
Judge Dismissed for Threatening to Enforce Immigration
Yes, you read that headline right. A judge merely
threatened to have a person who admitted to breaking the law arrested was dismissed for his actions. Very clearly, at least in Los Angeles, and in MANY districts across the country, judges are literally being prohibited from enforcing the law.
Can someone explain to me why we have laws regarding citizenship? Here in North Carolina, illegal immigrants are not only allowed to vote, but actively encouraged to vote. The Democrats who run the legislature absolutely refuse to do anything about it.
Now we have a judge that is basically FIRED for threatening to have an admitted lawbreaker arrested. I wonder if I will be arrested and jailed if I a person comes to me an admits they committed a murder and I threaten to tell the police. I guess it just depends on whether that particular judge decides that they, personally, want to enforce the laws against murder because today the judges decide the law, not people.
Posted by: Ogre at
12:51 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What the ....
For a second there I thought they were talking about the USA, been then I saw it was only in LA.
Posted by: Tomslick at July 24, 2006 07:35 PM (RpnNu)
2
I've been saying for decades that we need to mine the San Andreas fault and let CA drift off to sea.
Posted by: Ogre at July 24, 2006 07:38 PM (/k+l4)
3
Wow, do you even read the story before you spout off about it? First of all, this was an attorney that was used as a temporary judge due to the overwhelming caseload. Happens all the time, but he was in no way fired. They just didn't ask him to fill in again. Second, he was not asked to return because, when a woman asked for a restraining order in Family Court against her husband due to verbal abuse and threats, instead of listening to her case, he asked if she was an illegal, and then threatened to have her arrested and deported if she didn't run.
Now think about it for a second (seriously, just think). Will telling illegals "If you make complaints against your abusive spouse, you will be deported" really be effective in stemming the tide of illegal immigration? If you think so, I would love to hear your rationale.
Now, keep thinking (I know it's hard, but bear with me here...) Will telling illegals "If you make complaints against your abusive spouse, you will be deported" limit the options abused spouses have in protecting themselves (and often their children)?
I would love to see the illegal immigrant problem fixed, but deporting any immigrant who tries to get help about her abusive spouse is not a good way to do it. It is, however, a good way to make sure those uppity Mexican women are kept in line. But none of us want that, right?
Posted by: Shygetz at July 28, 2006 02:42 PM (VPFKi)
4
Continue your whining. You're making yourself look petty and silly. Hey, know what? I'm not going to "fire you," I'm going to not have you come to work any more. So you're not "fired," you just don't work here and I don't pay you any more.
And yes, I honestly don't think the US legal system that is paid for by taxpayers should be used by criminals. In case you don't get that one, the illegals ARE criminals. That's why they're called ILLEGALS.
I support telling criminal aliens that they are allowed ZERO access to ANY taxpayer-financed things -- roads, buses, housing, medical treatment, welfare, courts, schools -- ANYTHING that I've paid for. Will it help stem illegal immigration? I bet it will -- and even if it won't, at least they won't be costing ME so much damn money.
Posted by: Ogre at July 28, 2006 02:46 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.1074, elapsed 0.2008 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1935 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
