July 14, 2005

Kennedy vs. Santorum

It seems old Teddy Kennedy is off his medications again. Then again, maybe he's on his own medications. Ted is in a total fit of rage because Senator Rick Santorum dared to step out and tell the truth in print, and then actually stand by what he wrote (so far).

The words of the head loon and chief drunk of the Democrat Party:

His [Santorum's] outrageous and offensive comments -- which he had the indecency to repeat yesterday -- blamed the people of Boston for the depraved behavior of sick individuals who stole the innocence of children in the most horrible way imaginable.

In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, "What a Maroon."

Teddy is simply wrong about what Santorum said, and he's wrong about disputing what Santorum really did say! So, what, exactly, did Santorum say? You can read the whole article written by Santorum, if you like. However, the part which bothered old Kennedy was this:

While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm.

So no, he didn't blame "the people of Boston." Instead, Santorum blamed liberalism. It just so happens that Boston is a big part of liberalism, and that's what really bothered Kennedy -- the fact that Santorum pointed this out to people.

You see, liberals cannot ever admit they are liberals. The very few who run around claiming they are proud to be liberals are either complete and total idiots, or they do not understand that liberalism has drastically changed from the original ideas of classic liberalism to today's version, which very closely resembles socialism.

The other part Kennedy gets wrong is the idea that liberalism and pedophilia cannot be related (if you're a liberal you may want to stop reading now because the truth really hurts)...

Today at the heart of liberalism is the idea that there is no absolute truth, you must accept everyone and everything, and, since individuals are the center of the world, any individual can decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong -- and a good adherent to liberalism simply cannot argue with anyone else's definitions.

In other words, to liberals, there is no black and white, only shades of gray -- and the gray is different for every individual. Well, the priests simply made up their own reality, deciding what was "good" for them, and no one else mattered. That IS today's liberalism.

Today's liberalism is about being self-centered. Therefore, Santorum's comments only make sense! If your philosophy is that "anything goes" as long as it feels good, it is only natural that you do whatever you want without restraint.

Look, liberals, Santorum has this one dead on. If you don't like it, leave the current liberal Democrat party because this IS the logical steps to take if you are a liberal.

Posted by: Ogre at 09:55 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 494 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Although I am not a Roman Catholic, I agree with Santorum. Since Teddy does not live his faith as evidenced by his actions and votes, he really had to find something to rail against. You're right, what a maroon.

Posted by: Pat in NC at July 14, 2005 12:04 PM (b98AN)

2 No doubt Ted is off somewhere in la la land. Off the reservation. Bats in the belfry. PS: no link to the American Flag league? Truth laid bear is wacko. Think it is dropping lots of links. Should show several to you from me. Crazy

Posted by: William Teach at July 14, 2005 12:30 PM (Pzlrt)

3 He's really out there -- I can only hope it's the last dying throes of liberalism. Sorry about the American Flag League -- you might notice I'm missing a lot of the blogrolls. It's on the top of my "must do this today list" -- and has been for days. It's coming, I promise!

Posted by: Ogre at July 14, 2005 12:59 PM (/k+l4)

4 ain't no thang. This whole css and html formatting thing is the main reason that I have stayed with Typepad, rather then moving to mu.nu, the times I have been asked. I do not feel like playing with it.

Posted by: William Teach at July 14, 2005 02:47 PM (Pzlrt)

5 I have a brother in law like 'the Diver Ted'. He's in a drunken stupor 24-7 but if the booze runs out even for a short time he goes totally nuts and will say or do anything.

Posted by: scrapiron at July 15, 2005 12:08 AM (M7kiy)

6 Maybe that's what it was -- Teddy's booze supply was running low and he needed some ammo for a fundraiser for the loony liberals in Boston.

Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:26 AM (L0IGK)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.015, elapsed 0.1339 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1252 seconds, 195 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.