June 29, 2005
Real ID Act
I know that
some people have a
real problem with the RealID Act. I'm not convinced...yet. Are we at this point yet?

I don't think we are. This guy outlines a quite long and convincing case for the "right to travel." (Long but very interesting read). I'm not so sure we have that right.
Some of the points about a national ID card are indeed very valid. Of most concern is the idea that if a 19-year old can get fake ID to get beer, do you really think a well-financed terrorist will have any problem with it?
The Real ID Act doesn't create anything that gives the government anything they don't already have. But it also does absolutely zero to prevent terrorism or anything regarding law breakers. It will make getting a real driver's license in North Carolina a little tougher for illegal immigrants, but that's all.
Is it a step down the wrong road? Sure. Is it really harmful? Not really.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:15 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanx, Ogre. That was a good read. Lots of good info, but I wonder if the writer had seen this, concerning the RFID chip that will be placed into the national ID cards:
http://news.com.com/Federal+report+warns+of+RFID+misuses/2100-7342_3-5723535.html
I find this alarming.
And THIS, was the absolute best rebuttal I've ever heard to the 'if you have nothing to hide..' argument:
"Still, some Americans think that 'if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear'. Were the Founding Fathers criminals trying to protect themselves when they inserted the 4th and 5th amendments into the Bill of Rights? After all, nobody who hasn't done anything wrong needs to worry about being searched or being forced to testify against himself."
Thanks again, and thank you for sharing a great read and a very interesting point of view. Also, thank you for the link. I take it as nothing shy of a great compliment every time YOU do that, because I know when you do; agree or disagree, you are respecting my point of view on the subject.
Blog ON, friend :-)
Posted by: Gun-Toting Liberal at June 30, 2005 12:06 AM (Adprk)
2
Indeed, I've seen things that show how bad RFID can be. The law doesn't specifically state they must use RFID, just some sort of electronic id -- they could use stored fingerprints if they wanted to.
Then biggest thing, at least to me, is that the government already has all this information at the tip of their fingers -- we're not giving them anything they don't have. You wouldn't believe how many times I refuse to give my SSN to people who don't need it (medical, electric bill, etc), who say, "Fine," then quote it back to me 2 minutes later!
Posted by: Ogre at July 04, 2005 04:22 PM (lZf6y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0148, elapsed 0.0927 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.0833 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.