April 20, 2006

Response from Senator Burr

A few weeks ago, when amnesty was the word of the day from the United States Senate, I wrote an email to both my Senators. The email was done from their contact forms on their official US Senate sites. It was rather short and to the point. I didn't save the exact words, but they were something alone these lines:

As Representative Myrick told President Bush during the ports discussion, not only No, but Hell NO to amnesty. Please do not support any amnesty for criminals.

I received a written response from him the other day (I'll be sure and let you, the good reader know if I get a response to the bricks I send, too). It's probably a form letter, and I can understand that. In it, he says that he is a co-sponsor of S.1438. I think I'll go take a peek...

Gee, only 70 pages long. I wonder what's hidden inside (my comments in parenthesis):

Sec 101a: A whopping 250 extra border patrol agents per year. (Well that's a good start.)
Sec 101c: Roads and barriers needed to "achieve operational control of the borders of the United States"
Sec 103: Training so border agents can recognize forged documents.
Sec 104: Requires biometric portions of ID accepted
Sec 201: Authorize funds to detain criminal aliens
Sec 203: Increase penalties for drug and people smuggling
Sec 207: More cash to deport aliens
Sec 208: More cash to hire people in immigration positions
Sec 210: Allows (but does not require) federal department to deny benefits to criminal aliens
Sec 220: Grants states the authority to enforce immigration laws (they already can if they want to).
Sec 222: Requires state to inform DHS about aliens apprehended
Sec 225: Requires the feds to take control of aliens transferred to them by states
Sec 227: Requires the feds to pay for state costs associated with criminal prosecution of aliens
Sec 301: Hire 3,000 federal union thugs employees to enforce workplace laws regarding illegals
Sec 302: Increases fines for those who knowingly hire aliens
Sec 311: Improves social security cards (tamper resistant)
Sec 501: Creates guest worker program
Sec 218A: Details guest worker program -- requires a fee from worker, requires job offer, application, medical form. Maximum duration of guest worker: 6 years -- unless they're a migrant worker (<6 mos per year). Families of guest workers could only visit for 30 days. If unemployed for 30 days, must depart.
Sec 218B: Allows anyone already in the US to stay -- if they admit, in writing, that they're illegal; give up all their forged documents; and agrees to leave within 5 years unless they become legal during that time. If they agree to leave and do not, they're fined.
Sec 801: Give piles of money -- $120 million -- to organizations who help illegals.
Sec 901: Give these "temporary workers" their own social security accounts called "temporary worker investment accounts" -- including taking anything they might have put into social security already.

And lots of other technical changes.

Well, it's not too bad, but it sure isn't good. I don't see a wall there, do you? I don't see anything about getting the illegals already here out, do you? I'm not impressed.

My Senator's letter also says

I support a comprehensive approach

Ah, crap. That's the Republican code word for amnesty.

Well, at least one of my senators responded.

Posted by: Ogre at 06:44 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 416 words, total size 3 kb.

1 At least you got something back. Of course, I have sent emails, not letters. I have recieved a letter back from Elizabeth Dole every time. Have like 10. Have several from McCain, and one from a Senator in Colorado, forget his name, too lazy to look it up at the moment. Plus from assorted House critters. Burr? Nada. He's not much of a replacement for Edwards, in my opinion.

Posted by: William Teach at April 21, 2006 12:12 AM (doAuV)

2 I think both our NC Senators are just kind of hanging around, collecting paychecks.

Posted by: Ogre at April 21, 2006 11:27 AM (/k+l4)

3 I wrote the chairman of the Senate committe on transportation, Wayne Allard, of Colorado, over the Triangle Transit Lite Rail idiocy, since Dole was so clueless over it. Got a letter back from him. Used the real name. Kinda funny how the next letter back from Dole wasn't as polite as the others. Coincidence?

Posted by: William Teach at April 21, 2006 11:27 PM (doAuV)

4 That is interesting. Usually I'm pretty convinced that they get thousands of letters and would never recognize my name if I sent them one a day -- and hell, I've given money to some of the bums.

Posted by: Ogre at April 22, 2006 12:25 PM (blszc)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.0142, elapsed 0.0823 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.0751 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.