Richard V on Thompson
Fred Thompson is a Washington insider.
“Fred Thompson has spent more years in Washington as a lobbyist than as a U.S. Senator,” Viguerie’s paper points out.
His client list included Haitian tyrant Jean-Bertrand Aristide--the leftist murderer who called the United States “the great Satan” and defended “necklacing”—the gruesome torture of fastening a tire around a victim’s neck, filling it with gasoline, and setting it on fire. Thompson’s defense? “President Clinton supported Aristide too.”
Fred Thompson is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. CFR is the liberal foreign policy Establishment personified. This is the club for Dean Acheson and Henry Kissinger wanabees.
Fred Thompson is a Big-Government Expansionist.
Fred Thompson has quietly voted for George W. Bush’s massive expansion of Big Government’s intrusion into American citizens’ personal lives. Thompson voted, for example, to allow government eavesdropping on presumed innocent citizens through “roving wiretaps.”
He was a key water-boy for one of the most unconstitutional pieces of legislation in American history—the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act. Apparently there’s something “dirty” about grassroots lobbying—unlike his lobbying for billions in corporate pork and welfare.
“Fred Thompson the political actor is very adept at delivering his lines about the need for fiscal responsibility, putting an end to pork and corporate welfare, and the rest of the conservative litany. Fred Thompson the lobbyist and Washington insider, however, sees pork as a juicy way to make a living,” says Viguerie’s paper.
Fred Thompson is no principled conservative.
HeÂ’s voted 14 times against the Constitutional right to bear arms.
HeÂ’s voted to grant amnesty to illegal aliens.
HeÂ’s voted to squander billions of taxpayersÂ’ hard-earned dollars on subsidies to gimme-groups like tobacco farmers, the Peace Corps, and the National Endowment for the Arts.
As Viguerie’s earlier paper, “Conservatives, Beware of Fred Thompson,” points out, Thompson provided legal services for a pro-abortion group—and then claimed that he couldn’t remember the work he did.
The July report also notes that Thompson has never walked among conservatives or fought in the trenches with us, preferring the company of big-government establishment Republicans like Howard Baker and Lamar Alexander. “Tell me who you walk with,” Viguerie says, “and I’ll tell you who you are.”
“Playing a conservative is just another acting job for Fred Thompson,” Viguerie concludes.
That’s why Viguerie used satire yesterday to show what’s really going on—click
here to read “Fred Thompson under contract to play ‘The Conservative.’”
“Conservatives, keep your powder dry,” Viguerie advises. “None of the four top-tier Republican candidates appears to be a true, principled conservative because none of them opposed the Republicans’ massive expansion of government during the last ten years. The GOP has taken us for granted for too long. Conservatives should make the GOP and its candidates come to us and prove that they are worthy of our support.”
Many more details about Fred Thompson’s conservative charade are contained in the paper, “Fred Thompson, the Faux Conservative,” available on-line
here.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:13 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 494 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Personally, I have never jumped on the Fred! bandwagon. He needs to prove himself.
Mitt and Rudy might no be the best Conservatives, but I believe they would be good overall leaders.
Posted by: William Teach at September 07, 2007 02:50 PM (NaHh8)
2
The local radio guy here in Charlotte had a 1.5 hour show yesterday. He invited Fred-Heads to call in and tell him why they supported him. It was pretty sad. Not one caller could clearly explain ANY position of Fred.
Posted by: Ogre at September 07, 2007 02:54 PM (oifEm)
3
So once again, in 2008 we will be voting for the lessor of two evils, again. Geez! What people always forget is that once in office, regardless of the "position," the politician will adapt to "middle-road" to get things done. For instance, Nixon was a "conservative" to most folks, however, the programs he put into place would clearly mark him a "liberal."
FYI, I don't want a united country, I want a divided country. Liberalism is a disease that need to be extinguished. Look no farther than the editorial boards of the NandO and Charlotte Observer or the NCGL.
Posted by: Wuptdo at September 07, 2007 04:42 PM (axYNA)
4
Absolutely! I think partisanship is GREAT -- especially if my side is the majority (hey, it could happen).
I already think I've got to add Fred to the list of politicians I simply cannot vote for. Rudy McRomney have already made the list. Huckabee's made the list, too. And of course, every Democrat candidate is on the list... not much left for me to vote For.
Posted by: Ogre at September 07, 2007 06:08 PM (oifEm)
5
I'm with William--I haven't made up my mind about Fred; I haven't heard enough from him about his positions. I'll give him the chance to make his case, but I just don't think it's been made yet. Once he spells out why he would make a good president, and what he would do in office, I'll re-evaluate.
Posted by: Nathan Tabor at September 07, 2007 10:14 PM (6fTrU)
6
Please tell me you have Ron Paul on the "no way in h*ll" list.
None of them are perfect, but, the way politics is nowadays, we are not going to get the really good people. Reagan was an aberation, being a truly principled man who stayed with his convictions. He did make some accomidations, such as the amnesty thing, though.
Personally, I would love to see Newt jump in. I have seen other conservatives say "no way," but, he is probably the best out there.
Posted by: William Teach at September 07, 2007 10:25 PM (iS/pK)
7
I don't think anyone knows Fred's positions -- and that's what Fred wants. Personally, from his actions in the Senate, I think he's weak on immigration and borders.
As for Paul -- I haven't put him on my "no" list, but I'm not hanging up Ron Paul Revolution signs yet, either. He's got a few wacko ideas, but if you listen to him closely, he really, really likes states.
For example, the other night, I LOVED when he clapped as the moderator tried to make fun of him for wanting to do away with the IRS, Dept of Education, and other federal departments - that would be AWESOME.
Posted by: Ogre at September 08, 2007 12:20 AM (QmAYF)
8
I agree with the above comments, I haven't decided on any of the Conservative candidates and personally - none of them have "jumped out" as THEE candidate for the Republican party.
One question: is Viguerie a reliable source? I hear him on the Liberal Thom Hartmann's Air America Radio program often and he's (Viguerie) always trash talking Conservatives. I don't know much about Viguerie, but from hearing him, he sounds like a sour, complaining old man way past his prime. So... how reliable is he?
Posted by: david drake at September 08, 2007 12:44 AM (UJUaF)
9
I don't know him personally (although I'm working on that one).
He's the author of a book:
conservatives betrayed. I haven't read it, but it looks pretty good.
Posted by: Ogre at September 08, 2007 01:54 AM (QmAYF)
10
Paul does have some interesting ideas, but, I just cannot get past his Trutherism and retreat from Iraq notions.
Posted by: William Teach at September 08, 2007 02:26 AM (NaHh8)
11
However -- if you cannot find a candidate that agrees with you 100% of the time, you have to find one that agrees MOST of the time. I can overlook his complaints about the war because of his excellent policies on damn near everything else: small government, lower taxes, less government, following the Constitution. I like those things, and there's really not any other of the candidates that wants all those things, too.
Posted by: Ogre at September 08, 2007 02:54 PM (QmAYF)
12
Thanks. I agree with "if you cannot find a candidate that agrees with you 100% of the time, you have to find one that agrees MOST of the time."
I don't agree with any politician or party 100% of the time. I think those that claim they do are only fooling themselves.
I too will have to look up more info on Viguerie. I am just suspicious of anyone who ID's as a conservative when every time I hear them they are on Liberal Radio trashing conservatives. They almost seem like a "plant".
My regards to Eric the Llama, wherever he may be at the moment.
Posted by: david drake at September 08, 2007 09:19 PM (UJUaF)
13
I think Eric went to the beach for the weekend...
Posted by: Ogre at September 08, 2007 09:33 PM (QmAYF)
14
Not a problem.
Hillary will be your next president.
Posted by: Dick at September 09, 2007 02:17 PM (sNsmM)
15
Llama At The Beach...now that's a great name for the title of a blog.
Posted by: david drake at September 09, 2007 10:57 PM (Qz46X)
16
So, you've been there already?
http://llamaatthebeach.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Ogre at September 10, 2007 12:57 AM (QmAYF)
17
HA! That's a great blog. What odd and curious timing for it to appear when compared with my comment. Hmmmmmmmmm......
I look forward to reading Eric's posts on life at the beach. He is such a good Llama. Most of the time...
Posted by: david drake at September 10, 2007 11:09 PM (UJUaF)
18
Well, that's Eric. He's been known to be a bit...strange at times.
Posted by: Ogre at September 11, 2007 01:13 AM (QmAYF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
26kb generated in CPU 0.0127, elapsed 0.0809 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.0726 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.