January 19, 2007

Sexist for not judging by sex

The route to political correctness and insanity continues, this time aided by the once respected Harvard University. A professor there, who resigned, then un-resigned, is complaining that the school is sexist (or the new, even more PC term: guilty of gender discrimination) because they refuse to hire based entirely on a person's sex.

Yes, you read that correctly. In order for you, in today's screwed-up version of an "Accepting" and politically correct society, which Harvard supports, to NOT be guilty of "gender discrimination," you must hire someone based completely on their gender and not due to their actual abilities.

I continue to agree the liberalism is a mental disorder. You have to have a really warped and diseased mind to actually say things like this with a straight face, AND actually believe them. In a logical, real world, this is utter and total insanity. But that's not where Harvard University exists, apparently.

At "issue" here is the landscape architecture department at Harvard. I'll wait while you stop laughing. Yes, they really have such a department. And don't jump to conclusions -- the department is not about designing landscapes, it's about advancing socialism through communist-style city planning:

The profession of landscape architecture is rich in scope, ranging from the design of urban landscapes such as New York City's Central Park, to the reclamation of brownfields, to the ecological planning of large tracts of land such as the regional watershed management of the western United States.

But this clinically insane lunatic reality-challenged loon maroon fool clueless moonbat professor at Harvard is complaining because this "department" has a whopping six professors and none of them are women. She complains because they didn't hire any women.

She's not complaining because they chose faculty based on merit, but on sex. She doesn't address how many women vs. men actually applied for any of the positions, or even if ANY women have EVER applied for the positions. The simple lack of a woman is evidence that they are racist homophobes, guilty of the hate-crime of "gender inequity." Why she hasn't called for and demanded the arrest of the head of the department is unknown.

People like this are utter and complete morons. They are incredibly selfish and enemies of freedom. They would never survive on their own in a world where hard work is rewarded. This woman wants preferences and cash simply because she was born without a penis.

Go back to London, "Professor" Schwartz, where you can enjoy the muslim takeover and be forced to ask permission from a man to walk the streets. Try producing and working for a living instead of trying to take away my personal freedoms. And Miss Schwartz? Go suck eggs.

Posted by: Ogre at 04:02 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 463 words, total size 3 kb.

1 From today's Globe: Roughly 70 percent of the department's students are women. In 1977, when Schwartz was a student in the program, about 50 percent of the students were women. She said there never has been a female tenured professor. "Just the facts themselves are appalling. I'm not pointing at any one person or any one thing, but this should have happened a long time ago," she said. Schwartz, in her resignation letter to Bok, wrote, "I ask you, President Bok, how can this lack of parity be allowed to exist in this day and age in any department within Harvard University, no matter how small the department may be?" Altshuler said he has made three senior appointments, all of them women, since he took over as dean in 2004. "And we are now far along in the consideration of Martha Schwartz," he said in an e-mail. "I prefer to leave it at that." 'nuff said. This is stupid.

Posted by: Raven at January 19, 2007 11:02 PM (/oMfF)

2 Martha is stupid. She's mad that she doesn't have a penis.

Posted by: Ogre at January 19, 2007 11:04 PM (pHUVv)

3 No, she's mad because there is no penis that is interested in her. Therefore she redirects her hurt to hatred. I will never be able to understand these feminists women and their dislike off all things male. How the hell do they think they even got here?

Posted by: Stacy at January 20, 2007 07:02 PM (92p8H)

4 Oh, I was SO not going to go there... heh.

Posted by: Ogre at January 20, 2007 08:52 PM (pHUVv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.1439, elapsed 0.1898 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1782 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.