July 24, 2007

Government vs. People

Here at this blog, I often complain about the government. I complain that it's no longer government for the people (or even by the people, any more). But sometimes readers may not completely understand what I'm talking about. To that end, here is an example of a government response and a freedom-based response:

Let's say you witness a situation created by government: the major roads leading into a city are congested with a large amount of traffic. Upon further observation, you can see that most of the traffic is created by individuals in their cars. While some observers may say that this is not even a problem, for the sake of discussion, we'll accept that there's a problem here.

Now, those who are interested in government-based solutions (socialists, communists, members of the Democrat Party, the media, etc) will all observe and see the problem. Then any solution that will be generated will be based on more government control. These types of people will look at the problem and say, "We've got to do something to STOP these people from creating the traffic jam." In this case, as can be witnessed around the country, government tries to STOP people from causing the traffic jam -- they attempt to force people into mass transit. They waste space trying to force people to drive in carpool lanes. They attempt to force people to stop driving by installing taxes and tolls. In all cases, however, all their efforts are focused on forcing people to do something.

In a freedom-based society, government would not try to force people to do anything (other than prevent them from forcing others to do things). A government that was for the people and by the people would instead ask questions like, "How can we let people do what they desire here and reduce the traffic?" They might actually build more roads. They might adjust the lanes so that more lanes are inbound in the mornings (and not HOV-only). They might move the government offices (and their employees) to a location that would remove those employees from the traffic streams. But in all cases, they would not try and adjust people and tell them what to do.

So go ahead and pick a side -- most people already have. Unfortunately, those who side with me, for freedom, often find themselves aligned against the government behemoth -- and paying for the government to take away their very own freedoms. I just wish more people honestly wanted freedom.

Posted by: Ogre at 03:01 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 422 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Can I be on your side, Ogre? I think of the health care situation. Why do people come here to get seen by a doctor? Because our system is fast and efficient while the government isn't mandating everything. I mean seriously, how many things can you think of that the government does efficiently? However, in a free, capitalist society everybody is constantly trying to do a better job so that they get more business. The government wants to keep businesses in check - what keeps a person in check better than another person competing against him? In a perfect society, roads would be built by private businesses, not organized by the government.

Posted by: Brandon Dixon at July 24, 2007 08:23 PM (kUMvN)

2 There is one thing that government does well: increase itself. And yes, I welcome you to be on my side. However, since most people do not want to be on our side, we may have to move somewhere so we do not force people to have freedom. I suggest New Hampshire and the Free State Project...

Posted by: Ogre at July 24, 2007 09:10 PM (JzmO7)

3 I envy the people in Japan and Europe and South America who have excellent inexpensive public transportation systems where they can commute to work and travel with their families without spending the $500-$1,000/month to own and operate a private automobile. But perhaps your idea is better. Just PAVE THE PLANET!! One giant slab of asphalt from the south pole to the north pole just so people can hop in their SUV's and drive anywhere they want at any time they want ... after all, who has the time to wait 5 minutes for the next train or, worse yet, suffer the indignity of ACTUALLY WALKING to and from the public transportation vehicles... way too risky for the average American to attempt so much exercise in a single day.

Posted by: SubwaySteve at July 31, 2007 02:03 AM (kcV1H)

4 If you envy the people in Europe who have "free" public transportation, why don't you live there? I'm being serious. If you think their system is so much better, you should move there. One of the few freedoms left to Americans is the freedom to move. If you don't want to spend the money for a private automobile, no one is forcing you to, either.

Posted by: Ogre at July 31, 2007 11:24 AM (oifEm)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.0141, elapsed 0.3255 seconds.
87 queries taking 0.318 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.