September 23, 2006

Truth About Light Rail & Safety

A guest editorial by Mark A. Palmer

Major traffic accidents that involve light rail are becoming worse. With developers and city officials not providing safety features needed for motorists, the number of accidents are become alarming. The powers that be want you think differently. Ask them, if light rail is so safe, why are people being killed?

The accidents have usually resulted in the rail cars to derailed and power poles knocked over; causing major congestion for lengths of time while the accident scene is being cleared. Fatalities are not limited to motorist but pedestrians as well.

August 11, 2004, Associated Press reported that Houston, Texas is averaging six crashes a month — a rate 20 times worse than the average for the nation's 17 light-rail systems

Interesting, studies are devoted to improving light rail transit safety through improved signal and traffic systems crossings. Is it a wonder that many consultants find this to be a source of lucrative and steady employment?

Monorails have some of the best safety records and cities should look at this. Monorail, being grade-separated, cannot meet pedestrians, bicycles, or motor vehicles; therefore, no consultants need to be paid to study ways to avoid collisions. Former North Carolina Governor Jim Hunt was open to using a monorail system for state but did not have enough support.

Construction is not the only concern for light rail. Many other areas of concern exist with light rail and safety. For example: passengers boarding without buying tickets. This has been a major problem around the country. It has taken major crackdowns and costs deal with problem.

Buses have drivers that collect the fares as passenger comes on. Riders of light rail are required to purchase tickets using vending machines on station platforms before they get on. One of the advantages of light rail, CATs said, is it allow for rapid boarding. In addition, the driver, locked in a booth, is able to concentrate on operating the train.

Light rail systems across the country find it is too expensive to have an employee checking tickets on every train, so they leave the task to police officers and fare inspectors. They make random trips up and down the line or position themselves at a station, asking to see tickets on board or once passengers have exited. Another difficulty is checking tickets with the random stops, with people coming and going.

With ridership of light rail low in cities, it has open a door for serious crimes such as rape and robbery. The problem has been the same everywhere: not enough police and personnel. What will our city officials do? It took them several years to hire new police officers the last time they were needed.

Our city has allowed our public safety take a back seat to the bureaucratic correctness of development. The same applies with Homeland Security. Charlotte is a sitting duck for a chemical attack. Terrorists could use a train that is carrying chemicals and release it upon Charlotte. Even worse are the many train cars that already sit on the tracks by schools and parts of our city. Throughout the world there have been all kinds of train accidents that have occurred with chemicals.

Colonel David Hunt, a military consultant to President Bush and various media outlets, spoke in Charlotte after the terrorist attacks that took place in London, England, which involved their commuter train. In the Q&A section, he was asked if Charlotte leaders should be concerned about light rail and rail. Colonel David Hunt replied most definitely and was concerned about the city's plans for rail. Several city council members were upset with this type of question. If a terrorist attacked or a train accident happened that involved toxic chemicals people would not have a chance. Just think: if this would happen near a school or downtown what would the outcome be!?

Mayor Pat McCrory and city officials have heard these concerns and nothing has changed. This is what occurs when heritage and democracy have gone. Officials seem to look over issues and want to band-aid city problems by different committees. Mayor Pat McCrory an elected official is accountable to the citizens of Charlotte, still has not enacted to any of these matters.

"Ask, who will pay the price? Charlotte-Mecklenburg Taxpayers, thatÂ’s who and hopefully not with their lives."

Mark A. Palmer / Spokes person-Take Back Charlotte Mecklenburg

Posted by: Ogre at 01:45 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 743 words, total size 4 kb.

1 So now they are trying this in Charlotte? I guess the Gov REALLY wants a lite rail system someowhere in NC. Since it is pretty much toast in the Triangle, Charlotte gets to deal with it. Write to Sen Dole now, because Charlotte will need Federal money. Time to derail the train!

Posted by: William Teach at September 24, 2006 02:59 PM (doAuV)

2 The current cost is up to $500 million -- for TEN miles of train. 10 miles. $500 million. Great deal, huh?

Posted by: Ogre at September 24, 2006 03:19 PM (QmGzr)

3 But does that $500 mil pricetag include the continuous cost of subsidizing the system since no one will ride it? It is the kind of boondoggle only a Dem would support. And, soon, they will bring out platitudes like "it helps the poor" and it is "for the children." They tried the poor one in raleigh, but, considering that the only poor people that would ride it were the ones going to Cary to clean rich peoples homes, didn't go over too well. I would support one if it went were people wanted to go, and was cost effective. But, since that is impossible with gov't......

Posted by: William Teach at September 25, 2006 12:06 AM (doAuV)

4 They have officially given up reasons to support the train. Seriously. The attitude of the city council now is, "We've gone this far, we're not stopping now." This was after all their excuses like "environment" and "the poor" were crushed. It's sad, really, but they honestly don't even try and defend building the damn thing any more, they just build it and ignore anyone who complains. And no, of course that current figure is only building it, not running it. And the $500 million is only the current estimate, it hasn't been built yet, and that's not including the recent requests for cash from builders to actually BUILD density to support the damn thing!

Posted by: Ogre at September 25, 2006 12:12 AM (QmGzr)

5 Railroad design is has a very high status but the basic physics for an ulta modern train are the same as the physics were in the 1800s. Gravity does not change around,yet,so something as simple as a comic book style layout can show almost anybody the math and basic dynamics of the designs. A lot of our economy is based on having people to go to college for about ten years before their ideas about railroads are ever seen, but an eighth grade student can almost duplicate the same design. People don't like that part,people don't like train crashes either. Almost nobody has their own homebuilt monorail in their backyard to experiment with and try new ideas, just talking about something like that will get people upset. I have no idea what might be in the mind.. of any idiot who would want.. a train to crash. I do know that if there are only four guys in the state who know how a train works, that might be a weakpoint. If everybody knew how the machine worked, then everybody would know a threat when they saw one. Try this...,it is fun, a choo choo train..., that looks right, but it is built with titanium ,and composite materials and ceramics and a great stereo and carpet and custom seats like a luxury car,and yes it still runs on coal, but the exhaust is built to take a lot of the toxins out of the smoke. Then this thing would be so light and so... fast with excellent brakes and then... Then the good part, how do you take it apart, pull up the tracks and leave town if the politicians start acting like spoiled brats? That is also physics, basic math, there is no rule embedded in the Chart of Elements or the laws of physics that claims trains must hold still and decay until some future generation comes up with a way to get the money, to remove the old train. We can't negotiate with a terrorist,all they want to do is freak us out. The idea of turning a bunch of high school age people loose with the finest tools and materials to build better trains, will probably freak people out too. What if they got ahead of us and we couldn't understand what they had built? I have fifty buttons on the remote control for my TV, I can't figure them all out.. and my cell phone has a better education than I do, and those things were built by fifty year old guys who finally got to the top of the dogpile in the architecture world. Show the customer the blueprint of a train, and ask the customer how they would like the thing modified to allow them to protect themselves. The bad guys will be basing plans on people never asking anybody anything or being prepared to try a new suggestion. The last thing they want to run into is a train we know all about, and then we might not invite the military to the party when we go to their town and ask what the hell that little stunt was about.

Posted by: Teeg at September 26, 2006 04:26 AM (zpcMd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0141, elapsed 0.0939 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.087 seconds, 194 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.