February 25, 2006
War on the Automobile
The Charlotte Observer, a local paper that absolutely hates freedom and anything associated with it, continues it's war on the automobile by calling for California-style rules on cars in North Carolina.
So in the twisted world of this group of socialists, when government requires and forces manufacturers to make less-efficient and more expensive cars, the consumer has more choices.
It's 2006, but again the words of George Orwell are shown as prophetic from 1984 (the book).
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
The Observer editorial staff hates cars. They honestly and seriously want to eliminate automobiles from the state. Why? Because cars support freedom and they despise freedom. Cars give mobility to people and allow people to move and escape from totalitarian regimes, like the one that the Observer would have in Charlotte.
Just one sample from the article that shows how much that staff will do and say anything to advance their anti-freedom agenda:
It may come up with a proposal to require that lower-emission vehicles be sold in this state.Good. It's time the General Assembly seriously considered ways to clean up vehicle emissions and give consumers more choices.
So in the twisted world of this group of socialists, when government requires and forces manufacturers to make less-efficient and more expensive cars, the consumer has more choices.
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness....
Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
And prudent in their own sight!
It's 2006, but again the words of George Orwell are shown as prophetic from 1984 (the book).
Posted by: Ogre at
10:03 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I do not think that solution to polution is by following California's path. I do think that there are several alternative methods to better our society.
I like public transportation (yes I know it is financially expensive but has the added benefit of getting people to walk more thus saving money down the road).
I think we need to invest in developing technology that could substitute the combustion engine.
I think there is a different type of energy, perhaps more efficient that buning stuff to create steam to then create electricity.
Good luck on fighting the California polution solution.
Posted by: David at February 25, 2006 02:07 PM (Jdbsc)
2
I hate this type of crap. I have a 6.0 liter gas hog of a truck, I love it. I get 10-14 miles to the gallon, and I drive it everywhere, because I love it.
I've been in those fuel efficient hybrids. They suck, they are horrible little cars that can't do squat. Hell, I've driven go-carts that are more enjoyable to drive then those things are, and probably have more power.
Posted by: Contagion at February 25, 2006 07:18 PM (e8b4J)
3
I don't know about "1984," but the ultimate source for the quote is hardly George Orwell.
Try Isaiah 5: 20,21.
Posted by: Bonnie at February 26, 2006 02:20 AM (CK4Yb)
4
I know somene with one of those new hybrids......it has a peculiar way of not actually increasing power when you stomp on teh gas...the engine just makes more noise and your fuel efficiency plummets......gimme a good old American muscle car anyday....step on the gas in one of those and you know it.
Public transportation sucks ass.....out here in Cali if you are riding the bus it's because you're a broke ass bitch that can't afford a car. The bus system in L.A. used to be the "RTD", (rapid transit district), which was anything but rapid, and the nickname in LA for it was the ruff, tuff and dangerous, for self explanatory reasons.
Mass transit will never work, because the people it is targetd for use by can't afford the real costs to use it, hence subsidies. Give me a bus service that reflects the costs of doing business in teh price to ride and I may ride, at least then I will know the broke ass criminal element wont be on there.
Posted by: kender at February 26, 2006 02:59 AM (p63Yb)
5
I don't like this facination with hybrid and alternative fuels. The recent pushing of ethanol is NOTHING more than buying the midwestern corn vote (seriously). That crap costs MORE THAN GASOLINE.
And yes, Bonnie, that's where I got it. Nice catch.
And you've hit it again, Kender -- mass transit is DESIGNED to make people dependent, NOT to save energy, costs, or anything else.
Posted by: Ogre at February 26, 2006 02:25 PM (CyQ4M)
6
Yes, alternative fuels and cars have awhile to go before they are usefull.
Have any of you tried out the hybrid pick-ups. I don't know if Ogre notice or not but more are appearing on the road. I am actually interested in one. Gas for towing and hauling and electric for everyday driving.
Also the transit in DC is used by just about everybody. I actually saw several different economic class people on it.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at February 26, 2006 06:27 PM (5+Jvh)
7
I have nothing against hybird vehicles -- if I have a choice! Let people buy them who want them and stop making ME pay for them (I pay now with tax money given as a gift to anyone who buys one).
And mass transit, even in DC is STILL subsidized -- which means *I* am paying for people to ride the train there with no benefit to me.
Posted by: Ogre at February 26, 2006 08:53 PM (CyQ4M)
8
I have done several posts on hybrids and they hype that they don't live up to.
They do not get anywhere near the mileage that the car companies are claiming because the tests they use to determine mileage do not take into consideration real driving.
That said the amount of polution that cars produce is a lot less then what anyone thinks, if I remember correctly only 10% of all pollution is caused by automobiles. So they could eliminate all auto's and still have a major problem with pollution.
Posted by: Machelle at February 26, 2006 09:20 PM (BksWB)
9
Another excellent post with actual facts. Yes, if you got rid of all automobiles, as MANY environmental activists want, there would be almost zero effect on pollution!
Posted by: Ogre at February 26, 2006 09:27 PM (CyQ4M)
20kb generated in CPU 0.0137, elapsed 0.0911 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.084 seconds, 198 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
88 queries taking 0.084 seconds, 198 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
