September 25, 2006

Who Runs the Military?

The big news today is that retired officers are testifying in front of the "Senate Democratic Policy Committee." In case you were (intentionally) mis-led by the title of the committee, this is a Democrats-ONLY committee. It's not a general Senate committee.

As you might imagine, the testimony is all about bashing Bush and anyone in his administration. But why? For what purpose? This committee was formed to

providing research and legislative support, publishing reports on important legislation and policy issues, tracking roll call votes, differentiating Democratic policy positions from Republican positions, and promoting Caucus unity and cohesion.

And

conduct oversight investigations and hold public hearings to ensure accountability in government; and 2) develop cutting-edge policy ideas through the creation of a “new idea network” with state and local government officials, think tanks, academics, and policy experts around the country.


In other words, it is a completely, 100% partisan organization with no purpose other than to advance Democrat power in the U.S. Senate. But for some reason, the press seems to ignore that portion of the committee -- it's entire purpose.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., the committee chairman, told reporters last week that he hoped the hearing would shed light on the planning and conduct of the war. He said majority Republicans had failed to conduct hearings on the issue, adding, "if they won't ... we will."

Again, for what purpose? Does Mr. Dorgan realize that HE is not personally in charge of the war? Does he have any clue that the military is NOT under control of the Senate? Does he even know that the President is the commander in chief of the military?

Is he trying to lead a coup against the president? Is he trying to subjugate the Constitution and take power over the military? Will factions of the military follow him? Is America now a third-world nation whose government will change based on the alliances forged with the military and political leaders? What other purpose could Mr. Dorgan have when he's trying to attack the current administration while wooing the military? He's clearly lined up military officials up on his side. For what purpose? This is certainly how other dictators have seized power in the past.

The ONLY real purpose of this publicity event is to drum up hatred for the current administration. That's all, literally nothing more. Well, if the mainstream media won't call them on it, I sure will.

How about some unity, Mr. Dorgan? How about some bipartisanship? Isn't your party the one that's always claiming to want to reach "across the aisle?" Isn't it the Democrats who claim they want to move America forward, not backwards?

This committee has zero power. They have only a partisan political agenda and purpose. They cannot dictate war policies. They have NO oversight of the military in any way, shape, or form.

Mr. Dorgan, how about doing your damn job as a U.S. Senator and focus on defeating our enemies instead of increasing your own personal political power at the expense of American lives?

Posted by: Ogre at 04:04 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 515 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I guess Dorgan has been watching the overthrow of an elected government in Thailand. I fully expect the democrats to try a violent overthrow the U.S. government. It seems that several former military officers (Clinton promoted PC idiots) are actually comitting treason on a daily basis to cover up their failures during the 90's. They have a problem, 'most' members and former members of the military would shoot the wrong way since they know the former officers are all failures. Solution, no democrats.

Posted by: Scrapiron at September 25, 2006 04:25 PM (GIL7z)

2 It sounds crazy, but then again, it sure looks like the lead up to a coup, doesn't it? If you were planning a military overthrow (followed, of course, by elections), you'd have to first get some military leaders on your side.

Posted by: Ogre at September 25, 2006 05:20 PM (oifEm)

3 Intersting thinking Ogre...I think this about sums it all up. All these stupid committee meetings that waste so much money, time, effort. Is it a coincidence also, that this report about how Iraq has sprawned more terrorists gets leaked to the NYT??? It's all an attempted coup!

Posted by: Raven at September 25, 2006 10:28 PM (YaJH5)

4 What else can you call it? The coup may only be in the planning stages, but I'll bet that's because they haven't been able to line up enough CURRENT military behind them yet.

Posted by: Ogre at September 26, 2006 12:51 AM (QmGzr)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.0714, elapsed 0.1905 seconds.
88 queries taking 0.1718 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.